It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: PrivateAngel
I'll add more. Maybe this is my subjective perception. Notice the folds on the blouse in the new video. The old one doesn't have them. These folds look very unnatural, as if the blouse had been folded for a very long time and had not been ironed.
38 Of The Princess Of Wales’s Best Royal Rewears To Date
originally posted by: G1111B1234
a reply to: DAVID64
Plus someone has put this in:
URGENT FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST SENT TO THE BBC IN RELATION TO BROADCAST OF PRINCESS CATHERINE ON FRIDAY NIGHT:
"Hello,
I am writing in relation to the broadcast from Kensington Palace on the evening of the 22nd of March.
It has been stated that the video of Princess Catherine was taken on Wednesday the 20th.
We have read the following article and note BBC Studios emphasis on 'responsibility and innovation' in relation to the use of AI:
newscaststudio.com...
We therefore have the following questions:
1- Was there any use of Artificial Intelligence in the aforementioned interview?
2- Was any of the footage or audio computer generated? By audio we mean the words spoken by Princess Catherine and/or the background noise.
3- Where was this filmed exactly? The setting appears to be a garden but was it done in a studio?
4- Was a green screen or other similar technology used?
5- Post filming was there any use of software for digital alterations?
As we are sure you will be aware there is a great deal of speculation going on and these matters should be answered as a matter of urgency.
Kind Regards,
David Clews
Lead Correspondent"
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
After watching the new video carefully, I'm pretty convinced she's working with a green screen behind her, and possibly even the bench is edited into the frame.
I see it like this: They released three terrible images/videos which were blatant fakes, poorly made & obviously ridiculous compared to the state of the art today. But then, they pulled out all the stops & created a whizz-bang amazing deep fake AI generated video, so good that we look at it and get a sense of reassurance that she is alive & doing well.
I believe she's still facing hardship of some sort, though I can't imagine what that would be. Her new video seems to be fake based on the way the edges of her body/clothing seem to lack continuity against the backdrop of a blurry flower bed & trees.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
I see it like this: They released three terrible images/videos which were blatant fakes, poorly made & obviously ridiculous compared to the state of the art today. But then, they pulled out all the stops & created a whizz-bang amazing deep fake AI generated video, so good that we look at it and get a sense of reassurance that she is alive & doing well.
originally posted by: G1111B1234
a reply to: DAVID64
I’m sorry but there’s too many coincidences and I don’t believe in those. Really bad video and no ring would vanish like that during the same scene , or during a movement.
originally posted by: PrivateAngel
Look at this old video from 2016 - look at her clothes, etc.
I also got a strange feeling when I looked at the new video of her - could it be an AI video?
I am not a fan of the royal family, but I don't wish them harm either because we are all living creatures, and I just want everybody to be happy.
I hope all this has a natural explanation.
Old Video:
New Video:
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
I see it like this: They released three terrible images/videos which were blatant fakes, poorly made & obviously ridiculous compared to the state of the art today.