Breaking Baltimore, ship brings down bridge, mass casualties

originally posted by: Goldfish7471
Where were the tug boats?

❗️ Hmmm 💡

Am I hearing right?

MSM says the "warnings" were sent out by "The Ship" less than one minute before impact? What! 😃

a reply to: Degradation33

A perfect time to execute a hack like this is during a Solar Storm. Perfect. 😊

Prayers to those that are lost and injured from this horrific accident.

I watch worldwide news and I listened to a Canadian structural engineer commenting that the bridge was built in 1977 and at that time the cargo container ships were half the size so I am assuming that the engineering of the bridge took into account the potential impact of such a collision by ship's size and weight. Now I was watching U.S. news and another structural engineer just stated that there is no bridge they can build that would be able to withstand a collision such as this one. Why can't they just reinforce bridge footing pillars by surrounding them with additional cement/steel pillars, or was it because the ship struck the connected as one piece, upper part of the bridge thereby causing it to collapse as dominos would? Engineers need to rethink how to build bridges.

Oh Boy. MSM really pressing the "Economic" Impacts today !! Look out folks. 💥💥 Very suspicious.

originally posted by: Kenzo

The accident has take odd spin....


Thread: Baltimore Bridge collapse misinformation Pro-Kremlin influencers claim the captain of the Dali ship is a Ukrainian.


You are being played.....it`s an accident .

Lots of controlled opposition at work. 😀

originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: xuenchen

video of MV BRIGHT FIELD crashing into riverside shopping center in New Orleans - 1997

www.youtube.com...

Clogged oil filter caused engine to shut down and go out of control

Notice similarity ...

Problem with engines result in loss of control

Those examples have nothing to do with the Baltimore disaster. Nothing at all. 😃

Why would you even present something like that at a time like this?

a reply to: xuenchen


Controlled opposition ???? can you explain what you mean by that ?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Goldfish7471

Baltimore employs local harbor pilots.

OhOh ❗️

originally posted by: Praisejah
1600 planes are currently under sone kind of cyber attack did this just get really serious could it be related oh mya reply to: Threadbarer

WHAT! ❗️☠️

No way in hell this was an accident a reply to: xuenchen

It was brought down no doubt like nine eleven
a reply to: Cavemannick

a reply to: quintessentone

They can put in barriers called dolphins that would help protect that supports. At the time the Key Bridge was constructed, dolphins were not in use. There was a proposal a few years back to retrofit the bridge with them but it was deemed to be too expensive.

a reply to: Praisejah

Despite the power going out about a minute before the boat crashed into a major bridge support.

Looked like an accident to me.

Why do you assume otherwise?

a reply to: Kenzo

Don't mind xuenchen. They're just establishing beyond a shadow of a doubt that they're a propaganda account.

The name would suggest Chinese. The methodology though would suggest Russia.

We all know wat he means so do ua reply to: Kenzo

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: quintessentone

They can put in barriers called dolphins that would help protect that supports. At the time the Key Bridge was constructed, dolphins were not in use. There was a proposal a few years back to retrofit the bridge with them but it was deemed to be too expensive.

There is also the issue of the cargo ships being very much taller these days, there has to be more than just dolphins constructed, IMO.

a reply to: Threadbarer

The bridge is a 1970s design.

And cargo ships were not anywhere near as large back then.

"dolphins" would have been prudent all the same but at the end of the day it will have been about the money they would have cost to install vs the risk of something like this taking place.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Threadbarer

The bridge is a 1970s design.

And cargo ships were not anywhere near as large back then.

"dolphins" would have been prudent all the same but at the end of the day it will have been about the money they would have cost to install vs the risk of something like this taking place.

Well the risk seems to have grown bigger now and they should take into account the age/condition of such ships and whether or not the risk of failure has also grown. So, structural engineers need to rethink a few things, IMO.

a reply to: quintessentone

I totally agree with you quintessentone.

But money talks and it will all come down to the likes of risk management.