The trick has been used since Nero burned Rome to support his persecution against the Christians. No need for assumptions, the evidence is all there.
It's been done again (9-11), and again (Hamas attack on Israel, to benefit primarily those mentioned by economist Schumpeter as the ones benefitting
from war and increased military and security expenditures or the accompanying policies and politics/politicians, particularly Americans in this case,
but also in other Western nations incl. Israel) and again (Moscow attack).
And it will continue, cause the ones people in any country vote for, don't care about the ones voting for them (and thus also not that they get killed
by terrorists, that just works in their favor given who they work for, see Schumpeter quote in the article below). And the ones benefitting from any
terrorist attack succeeding in their country (those being voted in or paid to prevent it, provide security and defense), actually have a motive for
letting it happen, as well as providing assistance in letting it happen (especially if we're talking about those making the decisions and giving the
orders).
Again, why do you think the Israeli military only moved in after the terrorists were done? While civilians had time to make multiple trips back and
forth to rescue some party-goers (just read a news story about that, not an Israeli soldier in sight, on multiple trips back and forth, still haven't
read a single main stream news story that exactly tells how long it took for the Israeli military to move in after the attack was already underway, or
even after the border was crossed by these terrorists; and it's obvious why little attention is spend on that inconvenient but oh so telling detail,
which should be repeated in every news story that tries to sell the idea that this delayed response was either by accident or tactically necessary, or
for some other BS excuse why they didn't do what they have been paid for for so long, and continue to be paid for). Why didn't they spring into action
the moment they saw all those pick-up trucks crossing the border (the most watched border in the world)? Why did they look the other way and did
nothing for many many hours, even though, preventing terrorist attacks such as these and providing defense and security is what they are paid for?
Could it have anything to do with orders from up on high (that they blindly obey, no matter what)?
The game being played is so obvious, that it's very telling I'm the only one talking about it. Divide and conquer is still the name of the game. Being
played by "the ruler of this world" (John 12:31), who the ones making the decisions and giving the orders are working for, on all supposed 'sides' of
a conflict. All on the same team: team Satan. Once more, cause people are still either too naive to notice or to stubborn/stiff-necked to listen (or
just plainly in denial)...
War—Why? (Awake!—1986)
...
Who Make the Decisions?
Austrian economist Schumpeter wrote: “The orientation toward war is mainly fostered by the domestic interests of ruling classes but also by the
influence of all those who stand to gain individually from a war policy, whether economically or socially.” These ruling classes have been defined
as “elites [that] are at all times involved in trying to manipulate other elements of the population, or the public mood itself, so as to perpetuate
themselves in power.”—Why War? by Professors Nelson and Olin.
Every nation has its ruling class, even though that group may be divided into different political factions. However, many observe that the power of
the military elite in every nation should not be underestimated. Former U.S. Ambassador John K. Galbraith describes the military establishment as
“by far the most powerful of the autonomous processes of government.” ...
Going back a bit in the article:
The Role of Propaganda
...
This is a fact of life in every nation. As Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt wrote: “Public opinion is formed by interest groups (politicians, arms
manufacturers, the military) that deceive the electorate by giving them false or one-sided information.” In a similar vein, historian H. E. Barnes
wrote: “Since the wars of the French Revolution . . . copious and compelling propaganda [has] been continued and greatly increased to protect
warfare against popular dissent, opposition, and factual analysis of issues.”
...
Thus, by reason of their political and economic power, the “elite” can control the media in order to prepare the masses for the bloodbath. The
idea is to make the suggested 'solution' (war, increased expenditures for military and security, voting for polticians that are pro-military and
security and anti-terrorism, or have some rhetoric with supposed solutions to the problem) seem necessary (and worth it, worth your vote or tax money,
and to make those fighting the problem, soldiers, police officers, politicians, more popular and seem heroic, as if they are doing something very
important, keeping the people safe, which they clearly are not when people are dying; this is incidentally also why you hear reports of thwarted
terrorist attacks, but the ones in charge of this manipulation game, know that these have less effect on the populace than when something terrible
happens that they can further use in the media to get people riled up, on all sides, this includes Israeli soldiers shooting on civilians that are
just trying to get some food, it gets the other side more enraged, can't profit from having a war on terror if you run out of terrorists, so they need
to drive these people into the arms of Muslim terrorist organizations, turn them into self-perceived 'freedom fighters', if they don't wanna fight
after being pressured, they've failed in their service to their master, who wants people to fight, who wants strife and resentment, who wants hatred
amongst mankind, makes his divide and conquer agenda so much easier).
The promotion of nationalism and patriotism plays a huge role in all this. The article gets into it more. Also national, racial and religious pride
(which has the additional effect of getting people to behave as described at Matthew 13:13-15, John 8:42-47 and 2 Timothy 4:3,4; "dull in their
hearing", Heb 5:11, especially when someone wants to tell them the truth about how the prideful ones were tricked, they don't like looking in the
mirror, especially if that mirror is God's word, the Bible, all His beneficial teachings, his warnings, and the instructions and advice on how to
resist the one "who is misleading the entire inhabited earth", Rev 12:9, and all his cunning schemes and conditioning+indoctrination tricks to get
everyone on team Satan).
James 1:19-25
Know this, my beloved brothers: Everyone must be quick to listen, slow to speak, slow to anger, 20 for man’s anger does not bring about God’s
righteousness. 21 Therefore, put away all filthiness and every trace of badness, and accept with mildness the implanting of the word that is able to
save you.
22 However, become doers of the word and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves with false reasoning. 23 For if anyone is a hearer of the word and
not a doer, this one is like a man looking at his own face in a mirror. 24 For he looks at himself, and he goes away and immediately forgets what sort
of person he is. 25 But the one who peers into the perfect law that belongs to freedom and continues in it has become, not a forgetful hearer, but a
doer of the work; and he will be happy in what he does.edit on 7-4-2024 by whereislogic because: (no reason given)