ohh colonel....

Shhh, just wait to see who wins our debate. i'm sure i can come out on top.

Sh!t my whole post got F'd up.

Well, in short order, Clinton's comment was made to ease the ugly political dissension that is ripping at the fabric of our democracy. Being that he underwent this up close and personal and handled it well (being that he is smarter than the repugnants), he knows what it can do but he kept our country together by keepingour wallets fat.

Unfortunately, this president is stupid and our wallets are no longer fat. So, to stave off, grassroots violence in politics, Clinton chimed in to save the day. That's all.

Now to reality:

The CIA sent two memos to the White House in October voicing strong doubts about a claim President Bush made three months later in the State of the Union address that Iraq was trying to buy nuclear material in Africa, White House officials said yesterday.

The officials made the disclosure hours after they were alerted by the CIA to the existence of a memo sent to Bush's deputy national security adviser, Stephen J. Hadley, on Oct. 6. The White House said Bush's chief speechwriter, Michael Gerson, on Friday night discovered another memo from the CIA, dated Oct. 5, also expressing doubts about the Africa claims.

The information, provided in a briefing by Hadley and Bush communications director Dan Bartlett, significantly alters the explanation previously offered by the White House. The acknowledgment of the memos, which were sent on the eve of a major presidential speech in Cincinnati about Iraq, comes four days after the White House said the CIA objected only to technical specifics of the Africa charge, not its general accuracy.

In fact, the officials acknowledged yesterday, the CIA warned the White House early on that the charge, based on an allegation that Iraq sought 500 tons of uranium in Niger, relied on weak evidence, was not particularly significant and assumed Iraq was pursuing an acquisition that was arguably not possible and of questionable value because Iraq had its own supplies.

Yesterday's disclosures indicate top White House officials knew that the CIA seriously disputed the claim that Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium in Africa long before the claim was included in Bush's January address to the nation. The claim was a major part of the case made by the Bush administration before the Iraq war that Hussein represented a serious threat because of his nuclear ambitions; other pieces of evidence have also been challenged...

www.washingtonpost.com...

You're dismissed.

Originally posted by Colonel
Yesterday's disclosures indicate top White House officials knew that the CIA seriously disputed the claim that Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium in Africa long before the claim was included in Bush's January address to the nation. The claim was a major part of the case made by the Bush administration before the Iraq war that Hussein represented a serious threat because of his nuclear ambitions; other pieces of evidence have also been challenged....

[Edited on 24-7-2003 by Colonel]

Yup, the CIA strongly advised the White House not to give credibility to that "intel." But, the fact remains your main man, Willy, said that SH had lots of WMD's, and thinks your anti-Christ, Bush, did the right thing.

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar

Colonel will come up with the most senses-shattering, cataclysmic post on Mr Blythe's position on Bush's misuses of fabricated uranium intelligence that you will ever read. He is Colonel, after all.

Yesterday's disclosures indicate top White House officials knew that the CIA seriously disputed the claim that Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium in Africa long before the claim was included in Bush's January address to the nation. The claim was a major part of the case made by the Bush administration before the Iraq war that Hussein represented a serious threat because of his nuclear ambitions; other pieces of evidence have also been challenged....



Absolutely brilliant from Colonel.

In one brief, incisive moment, he has pointed out the irrelevance of Clinton to the matter at hand...



[Edited on 24-7-2003 by MaskedAvatar]

Originally posted by Colonel

Well, in short order, Clinton's comment was made to ease the ugly political dissension that is ripping at the fabric of our democracy. Being that he underwent this up close and personal and handled it well (being that he is smarter than the repugnants), he knows what it can do but he kept our country together by keepingour wallets fat.

Unfortunately, this president is stupid and our wallets are no longer fat. So, to stave off, grassroots violence in politics, Clinton chimed in to save the day. That's all.

Now to reality:

Full marks, Colonel, for the copybook Sampras serve and volley approach. Not a glitch.

How did that BBQ go, men?

BTW, the topic is "ohh colonel...." so clearly everything he says from this point is grounded in cold, hard reality with full S.H.I.E.L.D. intelligence back-up, none of the silly reliance on and scapegoating of CIA or Bush-admin manufactured agencies.

Originally posted by Colonel
Unfortunately, this president is stupid and our wallets are no longer fat. So, to stave off, grassroots violence in politics, Clinton chimed in to save the day. That's all.

Wow, thanks wild Bill. Way to go. I knew you would ride in to the rescue!!! Such a self-less person. Where would we be without you..more importantly, where would our friends China be in their nuclear technology, not to mention North Korea? Gee, thanks Bill..now bite that lip so we all can swoon!

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar

Originally posted by Colonel

Well, in short order, Clinton's comment was made to ease the ugly political dissension that is ripping at the fabric of our democracy. Being that he underwent this up close and personal and handled it well (being that he is smarter than the repugnants), he knows what it can do but he kept our country together by keepingour wallets fat.

Unfortunately, this president is stupid and our wallets are no longer fat. So, to stave off, grassroots violence in politics, Clinton chimed in to save the day. That's all.

Now to reality:

Full marks, Colonel, for the copybook Sampras serve and volley approach. Not a glitch.

How did that BBQ go, men?

BTW, the topic is "ohh colonel...." so clearly everything he says from this point is grounded in cold, hard reality with full S.H.I.E.L.D. intelligence back-up, none of the silly reliance on and scapegoating of CIA or Bush-admin manufactured agencies.

Thank you, Masked Avatar, I do what I can.

Don't pat yourself to hard on the back Colonel.......MA pretty much goes along with anyone that is against Bush and the administration anyhoo.......


regards
seekerof

* pats Seekerof on the back, in sympathy *

hehe, none needed MA....
Agent Colonel may need more "backing".....may want to stay tuned.

regards
seekerof

*...turns first steak over and checks for proper grill marks..*

Truth trumps opinion everytime. It wasn't hard.

*stabs perfectly cooked steak off grill with bowie, and walks over to cooler getting cold one*

Sup guys, did I miss anything?

*takes huge bite out of steak and smiles as he chews the bloody meat*

Originally posted by ADVISOR
*stabs perfectly cooked steak off grill with bowie, and walks over to cooler getting cold one*

Sup guys, did I miss anything?

*takes huge bite out of steak and smiles as he chews the bloody meat*

Just the usual Colonel a$$ kickin. No biggie.

Dude, you're on your way to an a$$ kickin. So put the X on your butt for my Justin boot.

That was for Goregrinder.

[Edited on 24-7-2003 by Colonel]

I love the fact that you talk a crazy amount of unproven trash. If/when you lose this debate, i'm never going to let you hear the end of it.

goregrinder

Make sure your debate arguments have more legs than your avatar!

Originally posted by goregrinder
I love the fact that you talk a crazy amount of unproven trash. If/when you lose this debate, i'm never going to let you hear the end of it.

Ok, I'll be fair. Do you prefer Timberlands, Justins, or steel toe?

Oh they do, MA. See the funny thing about the debate is i am arguing FOR the fact that the United States has lost its' international soverignty. The colonels is arguing AGAINST that proposition. I'm thinking he has his hands mighty full.

Good luck both!

I don't do a good Mills Lane impersonation. Not bald, too tall, dark and handsome.