Minnesota politician is fighting the trans-maniacs

My family has a ton of men with the "noassatall" syndrome. We had to make up for it with brains and hopefully, good enough looks.

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: DBCowboy

Well if you have to go on birth certificate, I guess.

She's still a man in a dress my ass could never fit into.

Logic?

What a non common, common sensical thing to throw into the mix?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Degradation33

Surgeons have the ability to shape an ear into looking like a nose.

But you can never smell out of your ear.

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: DBCowboy

I never had the religious indoctrination that found this offensive. I was conditioned by a feminist psyche major. Although I really didn't care, my sister and I were persauded from wearing dresses because they conditioned gender roles.

And by the time I was in third grade that was getting angry I got a pink baton twirling handout instead of the blue karate one. At 9 I saw that as defining gender roles.

so you were indoctrinated your whole life. Well, that does explain things much clearer.

Do you ever wish you were allowed to be who you were, rather than who you were expected to be?

Postmodern humans have gone so far from their natural state that if they had to revert to natural behavior they would never survive it. Issues like this have been deviating from natural evolutionary behaviors since humans have left the niche they have occupied for hundreds of millions of years.

I personally believe humans were shaped by nature to be low-technology nomadic beings that know just enough to provide everything they need to survive and reproduce. IMO the most primitive tribal lifestyles are the natural state of the human condition and these postmodern issues are counterproductive when survival is your main concern. Abstract ideas that serve no survival function would be rejected in favor of those that do along with relying on instincts.

If man rejects his place in nature, nature will reject man. If you know how to thrive in an urban lifestyle, but have no clue how to survive in a natural environment, you have little hope of surviving a major disruption like a natural or man-made disaster. Nature brought us to a point with our brain capacity, but I believe we got way off track with the knowledge we gained after that. The Myth of Daedalus and Icarus comes to mind.

a reply to: glen200376Not a single man in drag with female makeup can ever hide that hideous voice. Never. No matter how many hormones they take, no matter how many digitally enhanced glam shot stills they present; once you hear and see them in person or in video, you know we got a homosexual man in drag again.

a reply to: network dude

Don't expect an honest answer, it would require the individual to admit they were psychologically abused by their guardian over an ideological agenda. They have already proven confronting truth and reality is too harmful and will simply retract to their comfortable fantasy.

Hopefully Minnesota has some sense and rejects these radical extremist child abusers and kidnappers from passing such a sick and depraved legislation. Frankly, there should be no mercy shown to any adult who kidnaps children to take them to have their bodies mutilated and poisoned so they can be passed around at adult drag shows for friendly touching and hugging.

so you were indoctrinated your whole life. Well, that does explain things much clearer.

Do you ever wish you were allowed to be who you were, rather than who you were expected to be?

I really tried to keep this short.

First thing I wanted to be was a surgeon. Encouraged. Then a lawyer. Then an Astronaut. Was it any wonder my sister and I both majored in male-dominated fields?

And while we were discorouaged from overtly girly things, we still got dolls. But we didn't play typical house though. We set up a MASH field hospital with them in the backyard.

And I asked for the toy helicopter so we could airlift in the Ken for surgery at our all female hospital. We loved MASH.

Gender role lite version. The Ken still was still the usual causulty, but Barbie would also come in wounded.

It was just slightly different.

Instead of being told a girl grows up, meets a boy, gets married, and becomes a homemaker, we were told a girl can do whatever she wants.

So instead of pretending Ken went and worked all day to come home to Barbie, Ken was in surgery under the care of a VERY qualified medical team.

It was subtle how that manner of thinking came about, but our thoughts weren't interested in making our barbies make babies.

Or really even simulate motherhood with full-sized dolls. Now a hospital where it was a child under my care, I was all about. Loved wasting the masking tape.

And we got every advantage possible. No abuse, just fostered a different way of thinking. And that led to "deviant" behavior. Like never having children. And not really caring until my mid 30s when the realization it's too late hit.

a reply to: Degradation33
You'd better go back and figure out what's REALLY going on. This seriously reads like a dummy's guide to mislabeled everyone on earth.

a reply to: AlexandrosOMegas

It was an attempted psychological operation for sure. And Trump knocking it down a bit is surely part of that process. They (meaning the concensus left-leaning opinion) had to have realized that was going to happen. Pretty stupid to think they could silence it.

And in 2025, the reclamation of virtue is going to re-energize the LGBT and support to do what they do best, which includes me, If we must use labels. I mean, I'm in this thread.

I feel if there was a best intention on this "road to hell," It would have been:

They wanted to stop kids from feeling different. That's all. Stop children from making existential realizations at puberty that lead to self-destructive behavior because they feel wrong and run from being different. And that now includes transgender as well. And because it's partially unstigmatized, the numbers may be inflated by trend.

* And yes, they did that at the expense of the 75+% of normal straight kids who I now have to call "cisgender", so it doesnt offend someone else I called them "normal". Yeah, that's freaking ridiculous. And they had difficultly separating their method of newspeak indoctrination from thought fascism. Which led to the culture of today.

That wasn't around when I was 13-17. I had this, culturally speaking. It would have never got far enough to backfire.

I never expected it to take either. Halfway was a surprise. It got as far as "gay is fine, trans is still mental illness."

Watching Woke v. Christian must be like watching Christians try to overtake Saturn in 250 CE

What I can't do, is stop seeing this as a naturally occurring mass sociological shift, that has reached the "influences system of control" stage.

a reply to: Degradation33
There is only LGB in reality. The T are mentally ill individuals who are either attempting to cope with and rationalize prior abuses, or were isolated children in front of screens that were preyed upon by online groomers and the subsequent propaganda they were encouraged to consume which reinforce the behavior while the parent pretended they were parenting.

A good parent would smack the wickedness out of a child once they realized the pedo grooming media they were consuming and do the right thing and remove any access to the internet for the child. Frankly this entire trend of identifying as wtf ever you want would disappear rather quickly if children were prevented from having internet access and instead told to go back outside and mingle.

However will the enemies of liberty brainwash the next generation if they cannot reach them with targeted brainwashing??

a reply to: worldstarcountry

There is only LGB in reality. The T are mentally ill individuals who are either attempting to cope with and rationalize prior abuses, or were isolated children in front of screens that were preyed upon by online groomers and the subsequent propaganda they were encouraged to consume which reinforce the behavior while the parent pretended they were parenting.

A good parent would smack the wickedness out of a child once they realized the pedo grooming media they were consuming and do the right thing and remove any access to the internet for the child.

At least its not done for being gay anymore. That use get called an identity disorder too. That flipped on its head in less than 20 years. California outlawed gay marriage in 2008. That created the California and trend of today. May not have become such an organized push for social upheaval had the formerly programmed let us get married.

Happy that's okay now, and maybe in 20 years "transgenderism is mental disease" will be as outdated as "God hates fags."

And it couldn't have gotten to that point without people freaking out over the greater threat that is the transgender. It's like, the more that was pushed, the less offensive gay became.

Gay was mental disease until it wasn't. I see Trans going that route too. And what science says their biological gender is be damned. I feel it only hurts people by making them uncomfortable thinking about it, or more common, angry they have to acknowledge it.

Might as well just admit, for many opposed, it makes them wretched sinners in the eye of god, whose will is being replaced by wicked deviance. Which no longer includes being gay at least.

Honestly, DEI didn't help. It pissed people off and triggered an adversarial (heterodox) tendency when they had to cosign something with ingrained discomfort, for whatever reason. Or have their time-honored right to control their born children beliefs from being undercut by the state.

I understand that, I just think you're going to need to FORCE TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN VALUES and make one of two identities assigned at birth compulsory, or outlaw rainbows like Putin does, to accomplish it. Maybe ban children under 16 from the internet?

I just don't share the belief that this is the undoing of sanity.

It may be a change of social mask, but I like the masquerade martis gras looking ones better, even if culture becomes weird for people. This one was born to feed conspiracy, IMO

a reply to: Degradation33

And so you don't typecast me entirely, here is a moment of levity.

This crawled across my newsfeed. Man makes good points. Like real transwomen want to pass without needing pronoun pins. Or the damage virtue signaling by straight people has actually done to legitimate LGBT people. And the damage the derranged aspects of the woke do to the rational ones that didn't need a puppet show at 4 to figure anything out. Possibly crystalizing as soon as sex-ed in 5th grade, when they realize they really don't really mind what they are being shown, or something is not lining up how it should. It will be good there is now a section on why that is okay.

He highlights the "overboard" aspect of the left. The face of woke. Not the reality of the tolerance behind it.

a reply to: Degradation33

I am still offended by open public displays of homosexuality. And the bible says what the bible says. I'm still reading the one Hindus like to read, so we will see what their idea of God has to say about it.
Putin is not the only one that bans homosexual propaganda. And frankly all minors should be deprived of the Internet and go back to physically writing in school and forced to leave the house and interact with the world like has been the historical norm for all of human history.