Russia Invades France

a reply to: glend

Indeed none of us are perfect, but I'm not the one trying to portray Gandhi as a paragon virtue.

Now trying to get back on track; you said 'England has backed Russia into a corner'. I asked 'how so'?
No reply - so again, How so?

You said that Russia was being 'forced to go on the offensive'. I responded that Russia has been on the offensive from the moment Putin ordered his troops into Ukraine.
No response - so.........?

a reply to: andy06shake

If I wasn't influenced by culture yes I imagine I could. But like you I have been tainted to see nakedness as sexual so no I would not. But if we lived in cultures that didn't cover up the boobies we would not be interested in looking at the boobies. The covering up I feel sexualizes things more so than not.

su@k @ff young boy's tounges that is.

He was teasing the boy. Not very smart. But he apologized to everyone for that wrongdoing.

a reply to: glend

If human bodies weren't sexualised then we probably wouldn't exist any more.

Womens breasts are meant to attract men as are their arses.

What sort of soulless, sterilised world would you have us live in?
A woman's body is a thing of great beauty.

No matter how you want to sugar coat things adult men simply should not be sleeping with their naked grandnieces.

a reply to: glend



I am just getting back on topic buddy like Freeborn suggests.

Because I'm drifting.

a reply to: Freeborn

You said that Russia was being 'forced to go on the offensive'. I responded that Russia has been on the offensive from the moment Putin ordered his troops into Ukraine.
No response - so.........?

You do realize Russia has the greatest arsenal of nuclear weapons on the planet? They are only being forced into limited warfare at moment. If they were forced to use their full offensive capability Ukraine would be toast within minutes. What would be the response from US or NATO if Russia nuked Ukraine. My guess nothing. No nation is going to sacrifice their population in a nuclear response for people already dead.

It appears UK and US are pushing Russia into nuclear warfare.

a reply to: glend

No. NATO does.

Only Russia is threatening to nuke the West. They regularly threaten the UK with annihilation.

Get real?

a reply to: glend

You do realize Russia has the greatest arsenal of nuclear weapons on the planet?

Of course I know.
They have the greatest number of nuclear weapons.
Who knows how many are actually funcional - hopefully we'll never find out.

They are only being forced into limited warfare at moment.

How are they being forced?
If they hadn't invaded Ukraine none of this would have happened.
Russia's choice - no-one forced them or Putin.

If they were forced to use their full offensive capability Ukraine would be toast within minutes.

So Russia decide to use first strike nuclear weapons on Ukraine - how exactly have/may they be forced to do so?
Their choice, no-one is making them do so.
Sorry, struggling to see the logic here.

What would be the response from US or NATO if Russia nuked Ukraine.

Let's hope we don't find out - but its worth clarifying only Russia has stated it will use first strike nuclear weapons.
And not just on Ukraine, they have threatened the UK and various other nations on several occasions.

Appeasement has never worked.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Russia cannot win a war of nutrition against the combined west. That's 100% certain. So west is forcing Russia into a position that they will have to use their nuclear arsenal. I only hope before that decision is made. Russia sends a couple of warning shots of coast of US and UK so people like you wake up to the reality of whom you poking and try to do something about it with your leaders before its too late.

a reply to: glend

It appears UK and US are pushing Russia into nuclear warfare.

Who's threatening who again?

You don't half harbor some crazy notions about whats whats glend.

Give that breadbin a wobble sir.

I think you have gone rusty.

a reply to: glend

So you advocate caving in to Putin because he has nukes?
And what do you think his next move on the international stage would be after that?

originally posted by: glend
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Russia cannot win a war of nutrition against the combined west. That's 100% certain. So west is forcing Russia into a position that they will have to use their nuclear arsenal. I only hope before that decision is made. Russia sends a couple of warning shots of coast of US and UK so people like you wake up to the reality of whom you poking and try to do something about it with your leaders before its too late.

You are MAD?

No such thing as a limited nuclear strike on the UK and US.

That would trigger Armageddon.

MAD.

a reply to: Freeborn

So Russia decide to use first strike nuclear weapons on Ukraine - how exactly have/may they be forced to do so?
Their choice, no-one is making them do so.

I have explained why in response to Oldcarpy2.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

How is of coast of US and UK suddenly on UK and US in your eyes ?????

a reply to: glend

So again, you advocate caving in to Putin because he has nuclear weapons and has threatened to use them?
What do you think he would do next?

a reply to: glend

The English channel is fairly narrow.

Nuking it would be fairly serious.

Are you serious?

a reply to: Freeborn

You must realize US/UK have absolutely no interest in the Ukrainian people at all. When Ukraine and Russia were about to make a deal it was UK that convinced Ukraine not to make any deals with Russia promising them NATO membership and the like. Allowing NATO to place nuclear offensive on Russia's border. As well as compromising Russia's access to Mediterranean.

Does any of that help UK people living a better or safer life NO. But it certainly helps reduce Russia's ability to stop UK and others from pillaging Syria's oil and the like.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

The atlantic side. Not close enough to harm but close enough to awaken masses as to the madness that exists in the minds of the elites ruling their mortality.

a reply to: glend

The vast majority of British people I know, and I know one or two, are still quite passionately supportive of Ukraine.

I'm not sure we actually promised them membership of NATO, have you any sources for that?
Sure, we promised them support, as did many countries.

I do know that if any foreign force stepped foot on one inch of British soil I would fight to my dying breath.
Why would I expect Ukrainians be any different?

They don't want Russia in Ukraine - any part of it.

If Russia hadn't been such twats to all these countries when they controlled them maybe they wouldn't be so scared of Russian expansionism and be so desperate to join NATO!

What you advocate is just letting Putin do whatever he wants and grab whatever land he wants because he's threatened to use a few nukes.
That's Appeasement and its cowardice.....neither end well.

a reply to: glend

This has been shown to be a lie.

Nuclear weapons don't need to be on Russia's borders.

Anyway, Putin claims to have started his War because he didn't want more NATO on his border


Thanks to his illegal invasion, he now has more.

Crimes river. Boo hoo.

Russia is in Syria. Aleppo wants a word with you.

originally posted by: glend
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

The atlantic side. Not close enough to harm but close enough to awaken masses as to the madness that exists in the minds of the elites ruling their mortality.

Oh, OK.

Yep. We'll be fine with that. Seriously?