Spars 2025 to 2028

This is from Alex Jones back in 2021, where he analyzed the Gates and Fauci "Drills" entitled "Spars 2025 2028" It is supposed to be a drill but you know how these drills go. It is detailed as a highly sophisticated military operation to depopulate. It states that when people realize that they can't go after the vaccine makers they will go after the politicians. Everything was worked out, including people going to social media, who will be censored.
This is an amazing look and analysis of what was forecast in a supposed drill, and what seems to be panning out. They have got rid of the elderly as they are not dying so fast anymore. It appears that the Spars broadcast from Alex Jones seemed so way out back then it didn't get much traction. But if one looks at it again it looks like it is playing out in just about step by step, It mentions "Conspiracy theories " That will flood social media they have planned for it from 2017 this should blow your mind. www.bitchute.com...
So the big question has Russia gone off script?

This website contains a link to the SPARS Pandemic 2025 - 2028 PDF, and it's free to download.

The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators

a reply to: annonentity

Pandemic is over.

No-one was "culled".

No one enslaved.

No economic reset - the same recessionary situation we have seen multiple times previously.

Also, there where decades of Hollywood movies and TV shows about these sorts of things. It's not so difficult to conceive that someone might have taken these 'what if' possibilities seriously.

a reply to: chr0naut

Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .

They are all the 'controlled MSM', even the blamey ones who disagree with the others. And the paranoid ones with a twitch living their lives out nefariously in mommy's basement (you got to wonder where they are getting their ideas from, if they don't interact with the world).

That is why you have to be sceptical, rational, and investigate things for yourself.

If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.

You cannot trust that any particular person or group is telling you the truth. Especially the unmoderated, the conspiracists, and the doom-porn purveyors.

Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?

BitChute Monetization Policy

a reply to: chr0naut

We all have our different take on things. But if you look at the IGG4 the time bomb is primed and the only thing in question is timing.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .

If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.

Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?

Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?

You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.

You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence

And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines

You have zero credibility.

originally posted by: ksihkahe

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .

If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.

Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?

Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?

You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.

You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence

And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines

You have zero credibility.

In regard to COVID immunization safety:

Adaptive immune responses are larger and functionally preserved in a hypervaccinated individual

Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - CDC

In regard to Ivermectin safety at doses with some effect against COVID-19:

This is from the CDC (.pdf): Rapid Increase in Ivermectin Prescriptions and Reports of Severe Illness Associated with Use of Products Containing Ivermectin to Prevent or Treat COVID-19

This is from the FDA: Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19

This is from the NIH: Ivermectin | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

This is from the Infectious Disease Society of America (.pdf): Ivermectin and COVID-19

This is from the company that owns the patent on Ivermectin for human use: Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Of course, if you think the pharma companies, CDC, FDA, WHO and numerous authorities around the world are all conspiring to lie to you...

ZERO CREDIBILITY/

WHY ARE YOU POSTING LIES?

WHY??????

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ksihkahe

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .

If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.

Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?

Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?

You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.

You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence

And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines

You have zero credibility.

In regard to COVID immunization safety:

Adaptive immune responses are larger and functionally preserved in a hypervaccinated individual

Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - CDC

In regard to Ivermectin safety at doses with some effect against COVID-19:

This is from the CDC (.pdf): Rapid Increase in Ivermectin Prescriptions and Reports of Severe Illness Associated with Use of Products Containing Ivermectin to Prevent or Treat COVID-19

This is from the FDA: Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19

This is from the NIH: Ivermectin | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

This is from the Infectious Disease Society of America (.pdf): Ivermectin and COVID-19

This is from the company that owns the patent on Ivermectin for human use: Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Of course, if you think the pharma companies, CDC, FDA, WHO and numerous authorities around the world are all conspiring to lie to you...

a reply to: chr0naut

Those are the same people who told everyone that experimental mRNA "vaccines" are safe and effective.

DARPA knew better, at least as soon as early 2020.



Here's a link to the FLCCC Alliance's Covid Treatment Protocols, for those who may want to consider taking a controversial antiviral medicine early into an illness, rather than risking getting much worse and ending up in the hospital:

FLCCC Alliance's Covid Treatment Protocols


From the NIH:

The final update of the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines was on February 29, 2024. PDFs of the Guidelines can be downloaded until August 16, 2024, when the website will be shut down.

I wonder why it's going to be shutdown soon.

a reply to: annonentity

Is this the one where they simulate a pandemic and remarkable vaccine rollout but then admit later how the vaccine for a pandemic was actually causing illness and death and they have fake media reports and everything for this simulation and game plan how to spin that in the media and public consciousness? Or was that crimson contagion. So many fake pandemic wargames and cyber attack war games.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

We all have our different take on things. But if you look at the IGG4 the time bomb is primed and the only thing in question is timing.

Here's an article about IgG4 disease: IgG4-Related Disease - NIH

From that article you can see that we have known about it since 1961, but despite that, the conclusions about its epidemiology are, "The exact prevalence of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is not known".

This makes it a perfect subject for doom-porn, because you can say that it will increase or has increased, and no-one can say that's BS, because we have no contradictory data.

That being said, other immunizations and pathogens also elevate IgG4 levels, and this doesn't seem to have produced enough disease to actually measure

And with the frequency of reinfection of COVID, now that it is endemic, I don't think that there is going to be any issue with a fall in IgG4.

Also, since the immune effectiveness of both the immunizations and the virus begins to fall off in three months, if IgG4 were going to cause worse reinfections of COVID, then we would be seeing it happening over the last couple of years. However, what we have been seeing is that people with a previously established immune response seem to have traces of that immune response for longer than each 'season' of COVID-19 reinfection.

originally posted by: Justoneman
ZERO CREDIBILITY/

WHY ARE YOU POSTING LIES?

WHY??????

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ksihkahe

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .

If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.

Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?

Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?

You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.

You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence

And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines

You have zero credibility.

In regard to COVID immunization safety:

Adaptive immune responses are larger and functionally preserved in a hypervaccinated individual

Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - CDC

In regard to Ivermectin safety at doses with some effect against COVID-19:

This is from the CDC (.pdf): Rapid Increase in Ivermectin Prescriptions and Reports of Severe Illness Associated with Use of Products Containing Ivermectin to Prevent or Treat COVID-19

This is from the FDA: Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19

This is from the NIH: Ivermectin | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

This is from the Infectious Disease Society of America (.pdf): Ivermectin and COVID-19

This is from the company that owns the patent on Ivermectin for human use: Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Of course, if you think the pharma companies, CDC, FDA, WHO and numerous authorities around the world are all conspiring to lie to you...

Why do you think they are lies?

Where do you get your information that you believe is more credible?

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: chr0naut

DARPA knew better, at least as soon as early 2020.

Really, do you believe that this is actually a DARPA document? What about the obvious nonsense about HQC being 'curative' in there?

Here's a link to the FLCCC Alliance's Covid Treatment Protocols, for those who may want to consider taking a controversial antiviral medicine early into an illness, rather than risking getting much worse and ending up in the hospital:

FLCCC Alliance's Covid Treatment Protocols

The FLCCC used to be a supplements purveyor. Tolerated by medicine when they were just pushing vitamins, but when they started to say that unproven and ineffective treatments were effective, without sufficient evidential proof of effect, they stepped over a line. They also had a paper retracted because it was found to have false data, and further papers never passed peer review. The two directors of the company have had their board certifications revoked for spreading misinformation.

The protocol cocktail of supplements and drugs that FLCCC is currently promoting for viral respiratory illnesses costs about $500 US.

From the NIH:

The final update of the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines was on February 29, 2024. PDFs of the Guidelines can be downloaded until August 16, 2024, when the website will be shut down.

I wonder why it's going to be shutdown soon.

Because the pandemic is over, the virus has also mutated to more benign forms, and also now that it is endemic, all of the human population have immune responses to the virus - it is no longer a novel virus.

a reply to: chr0naut

Really, do you believe that this is actually a DARPA document? What about the obvious nonsense about HQC being 'curative' in there?

It looks like this information has already been shared with you.

DARPA Document Info and Links

THEY LIED TO YOU: New Study Finds People Who Took Ivermectin for COVID Recovered Faster – As TGP Reported Over Two Years Ago!

As The Gateway Pundit reported for years now – There have been over 101 scientific studies on Ivermectin that confirmed the significant benefit of taking the drug in treating COVID-19 in its early stages.

The science is undeniable. Despite this the US government condemned its use for COVID-19. And the government is now responsible for killing tens of thousands of Americans who did not have to die.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Justoneman
ZERO CREDIBILITY/

WHY ARE YOU POSTING LIES?

WHY??????

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ksihkahe

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .

If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.

Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?

Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?

You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.

You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence

And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines

You have zero credibility.

In regard to COVID immunization safety:

Adaptive immune responses are larger and functionally preserved in a hypervaccinated individual

Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - CDC

In regard to Ivermectin safety at doses with some effect against COVID-19:

This is from the CDC (.pdf): Rapid Increase in Ivermectin Prescriptions and Reports of Severe Illness Associated with Use of Products Containing Ivermectin to Prevent or Treat COVID-19

This is from the FDA: Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19

This is from the NIH: Ivermectin | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

This is from the Infectious Disease Society of America (.pdf): Ivermectin and COVID-19

This is from the company that owns the patent on Ivermectin for human use: Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Of course, if you think the pharma companies, CDC, FDA, WHO and numerous authorities around the world are all conspiring to lie to you...

Why do you think they are lies?

Where do you get your information that you believe is more credible?

One reason for most of us would be YOU were supporting it. Track record on factualness. There are real world examples that have been given to you since 2020 that I have seen you dance on pin heads for a sliver of a reason to speak. I can set my clock by people who are always wrong and you are wasting time accept to get a jolly for yourself.

People that try to support their lies with gttr, bitchute, AJ, the blaze, or any other biased agenda driven source can't be trusted. Same as the Qanon cult imo.

,

originally posted by: lilzazz
People that try to support their lies with gttr, bitchute, AJ, the blaze, or any other biased agenda driven source can't be trusted. Same as the Qanon cult imo.

,

I study them both on a case by case basis. At least the Q anons turned out to be prophetic in nature relative to the predictions of where the left was taking us. They did get most all things correct after the feelz of them saying it wore off.