It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .
If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.
Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?
originally posted by: ksihkahe
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .
If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.
Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?
Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?
You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.
You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence
And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines
You have zero credibility.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: ksihkahe
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .
If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.
Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?
Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?
You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.
You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence
And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines
You have zero credibility.
In regard to COVID immunization safety:
Adaptive immune responses are larger and functionally preserved in a hypervaccinated individual
Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - CDC
In regard to Ivermectin safety at doses with some effect against COVID-19:
This is from the CDC (.pdf): Rapid Increase in Ivermectin Prescriptions and Reports of Severe Illness Associated with Use of Products Containing Ivermectin to Prevent or Treat COVID-19
This is from the FDA: Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19
This is from the NIH: Ivermectin | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines
This is from the Infectious Disease Society of America (.pdf): Ivermectin and COVID-19
This is from the company that owns the patent on Ivermectin for human use: Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Of course, if you think the pharma companies, CDC, FDA, WHO and numerous authorities around the world are all conspiring to lie to you...
The final update of the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines was on February 29, 2024. PDFs of the Guidelines can be downloaded until August 16, 2024, when the website will be shut down.
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
We all have our different take on things. But if you look at the IGG4 the time bomb is primed and the only thing in question is timing.
originally posted by: Justoneman
ZERO CREDIBILITY/
WHY ARE YOU POSTING LIES?
WHY??????
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: ksihkahe
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .
If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.
Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?
Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?
You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.
You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence
And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines
You have zero credibility.
In regard to COVID immunization safety:
Adaptive immune responses are larger and functionally preserved in a hypervaccinated individual
Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - CDC
In regard to Ivermectin safety at doses with some effect against COVID-19:
This is from the CDC (.pdf): Rapid Increase in Ivermectin Prescriptions and Reports of Severe Illness Associated with Use of Products Containing Ivermectin to Prevent or Treat COVID-19
This is from the FDA: Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19
This is from the NIH: Ivermectin | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines
This is from the Infectious Disease Society of America (.pdf): Ivermectin and COVID-19
This is from the company that owns the patent on Ivermectin for human use: Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Of course, if you think the pharma companies, CDC, FDA, WHO and numerous authorities around the world are all conspiring to lie to you...
originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: chr0naut
DARPA knew better, at least as soon as early 2020.
Here's a link to the FLCCC Alliance's Covid Treatment Protocols, for those who may want to consider taking a controversial antiviral medicine early into an illness, rather than risking getting much worse and ending up in the hospital:
FLCCC Alliance's Covid Treatment Protocols
From the NIH:
The final update of the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines was on February 29, 2024. PDFs of the Guidelines can be downloaded until August 16, 2024, when the website will be shut down.
I wonder why it's going to be shutdown soon.
Really, do you believe that this is actually a DARPA document? What about the obvious nonsense about HQC being 'curative' in there?
As The Gateway Pundit reported for years now – There have been over 101 scientific studies on Ivermectin that confirmed the significant benefit of taking the drug in treating COVID-19 in its early stages.
The science is undeniable. Despite this the US government condemned its use for COVID-19. And the government is now responsible for killing tens of thousands of Americans who did not have to die.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Justoneman
ZERO CREDIBILITY/
WHY ARE YOU POSTING LIES?
WHY??????
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: ksihkahe
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
Have you followed the news lately? Not the controlled MSM .
If someone says something outrageous and incredible, that's a big red-flag that it's probably BS.
Like somebody that makes the claim that COVID vaccines are far more safe than Ivermectin then hides like a child when given a chance to defend that lie?
Look for exaggerations, fuzzy numbers, discrepancies and contradictions. Also look at the history of the person presenting the stuff. Do they genuinely care, or are they doing it for their own fame, have they lied before, are they making money off views of their BS?
You're literally describing the pharmaceutical companies, CDC, and FDA.
You've had opportunities to defend their lies that you claimed were "The Science" and failed to show up...
The truth trickles out about overblown COVID numbers
Former federal MP and Australian (AMA) president has broken her silence
And you also failed to defend your own lie...
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines
You have zero credibility.
In regard to COVID immunization safety:
Adaptive immune responses are larger and functionally preserved in a hypervaccinated individual
Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - CDC
In regard to Ivermectin safety at doses with some effect against COVID-19:
This is from the CDC (.pdf): Rapid Increase in Ivermectin Prescriptions and Reports of Severe Illness Associated with Use of Products Containing Ivermectin to Prevent or Treat COVID-19
This is from the FDA: Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19
This is from the NIH: Ivermectin | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines
This is from the Infectious Disease Society of America (.pdf): Ivermectin and COVID-19
This is from the company that owns the patent on Ivermectin for human use: Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Of course, if you think the pharma companies, CDC, FDA, WHO and numerous authorities around the world are all conspiring to lie to you...
Why do you think they are lies?
Where do you get your information that you believe is more credible?
originally posted by: lilzazz
People that try to support their lies with gttr, bitchute, AJ, the blaze, or any other biased agenda driven source can't be trusted. Same as the Qanon cult imo.
,