Congress Democrats are Formulating a Bill to REMOVE TRUMP From the Race ASAP.

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: WeMustCare

The pollsters are saying that because she is who they want.

Completely corrupt and sold out to the MIC and IC. She'd happily continue everything the current regime is doing. Just with an R next to her name. The uniparty would continue without missing a beat.

Nikki is staying in the race, hoping Trump gets knocked out of it. Trump needs to pick a VP running mate immediately, to remove hope from Buzzard Nikki, hovering overhead.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: Euronymous2625
Good. Now remove Biden, and let's pick some fresh blood.

The head of the Democrat National Committee says any Democrat who thinks Joe Biden should be replaced, is certifiably crazy!

He's serious!: www.businessinsider.com...

😨

Well, to be fair...most democrats I know ARE pretty crazy.

The Dems I know are all short-sighted. They don't understand that Biden's "fighting for auto worker's rights!" with that 25% pay increase, will increase car prices, reducing sales, causing labor to be laid off in 2 years. Short sighted, born out of stupidity and poor upbringing.

a reply to: WeMustCare

Noted that you don't support wage increases. I'm sure every auto worker will agree with you. Although they won't if they don't have a steady savings and that is a hard thing to come by in these trying times.

a reply to: WeMustCare

If you have to remove someone from the ballot in order to win, that says a lot more about you than the one you are removing.

a reply to: WeMustCare

Raskin, D-Md., who on the House Oversight Committee, said he was collaborating with colleagues like Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., to "revive legislation that we had to set up a process by which we could determine that someone who committed insurrection is disqualified by section three of the 14th amendment".

It's a moot point. No matter their opinion, or deluded reasoning, Trump is not guilty of insurrection, not in any official capacity.

originally posted by: Loadandgo
a reply to: WeMustCare

Raskin, D-Md., who on the House Oversight Committee, said he was collaborating with colleagues like Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., to "revive legislation that we had to set up a process by which we could determine that someone who committed insurrection is disqualified by section three of the 14th amendment".

. . . not in any official capacity.

Yet.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Loadandgo
a reply to: WeMustCare

Raskin, D-Md., who on the House Oversight Committee, said he was collaborating with colleagues like Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., to "revive legislation that we had to set up a process by which we could determine that someone who committed insurrection is disqualified by section three of the 14th amendment".

. . . not in any official capacity.

Yet.

Nyet .......

The latest now democrats want to dismantle the supreme court openly in congress.

Wow really, how can anybody vote for democrat traitors to the constitution and the US.

Doesn't people get it, they hate patriots and Americans taxpayers soo much they are bringing millions of illegals to replace us.

a reply to: Annee

The left has been chasing their tales on this matter for 3 years now, if they don't have anything to officially charge him and convict him, they never will.

I guess until they fabricate what they want the truth to be......

a reply to: PorkChop96

Is been 7 years the democrats has been after him, since he won the elections, still nothing to show for.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: PorkChop96

Is been 7 years the democrats has been after him, since he won the elections, still nothing to show for.

Prove he won the election.

No one has yet.

a reply to: Annee

Yep, I agree, biden stole the darn election, glad you get to see the light Annee.

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BernnieJGato

Democrats are dreaming and sensationalizing again. ⚔️

Disqualification from Public Office Under the 14th Amendment


Is disqualification different than impeachment?

Yes. Someone who is impeached could be disqualified from holding public office in the future if they are convicted, and Congress applies such a punishment. But this is separate from disqualification under the 14th Amendment. Under Sections 3 and 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, Congress can bar someone from holding office. But unlike an impeachment conviction, that decision could be overturned by the courts. Most importantly, disqualification under the 14th Amendment does not require the two-thirds vote needed to convict during an impeachment trial. However, two-thirds of both houses must agree to remove the "disability," once imposed.

⚔️

SPEAKER JOHNSON must be at a party.

But a spokesperson for Speaker Johnson told Fox News Digital on Monday night that his Democrat colleagues should “get a grip.”

SUPREME COURT RULES UNANIMOUSLY FOR TRUMP IN COLORADO BALLOT DISQUALIFICATION DISPUTE

“Democrats need to get a grip. In this country, the American people decide the next president—not the courts and not the Congress,” the spokesperson said.

Source: thebaltimorepost.com... -grip/

LOL GET A GRIP Democrats!

I’m hoping this guy has a little more integrity than Boehner, Ryan, McCarthy, Romney, Cheney, et al.

These people would literally be working harder than Raskin, Schiff, Swalwell, Pelosi ….. to screw Trump.

Not sure that Johnson has won our trust yet. He looks “not as bad” as those guys, but he definitely looks scared about keeping his position, and more worried about that than anything else.

originally posted by: Loadandgo
a reply to: WeMustCare

Raskin, D-Md., who on the House Oversight Committee, said he was collaborating with colleagues like Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., to "revive legislation that we had to set up a process by which we could determine that someone who committed insurrection is disqualified by section three of the 14th amendment".

It's a moot point. No matter their opinion, or deluded reasoning, Trump is not guilty of insurrection, not in any official capacity.

They literally don’t understand this from the perspective of a retarded 6-year-old.

If you tell any of them that they can’t personally declare Trump an insurrectionist, they will look at you with a blank stare and slack jaw ……. And say “why ? That’s not fair”
Them and “81 million” others and several ATS all-Stars.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: PorkChop96

Is been 7 years the democrats has been after him, since he won the elections, still nothing to show for.

Prove he won the election.

No one has yet.

7 years would be the 2016 election ….. don’t think this needs much “proving”.

So quick to derail and throw out flack …. That you don’t even care what’s actually being talked about.

a reply to: marg6043

That is a fact, but as far as the "insurrection" goes, they have nothing on him and they know it

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Loadandgo
a reply to: WeMustCare

Raskin, D-Md., who on the House Oversight Committee, said he was collaborating with colleagues like Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., to "revive legislation that we had to set up a process by which we could determine that someone who committed insurrection is disqualified by section three of the 14th amendment".

. . . not in any official capacity.

Yet.

naught never ever 😃

This right here.....

'The House of Representatives already impeached Donald Trump for participating in insurrection by inciting it,' Raskin told CNN shortly after the ruling. 'So, the House has already pronounced upon that.'

Meanwhile Maine Democrat Rep. Jared Golden told DailyMail.com in a statement: 'The Supreme Court got it right.' 'I believe Donald Trump incited the violence that took place on January 6, and my vote to impeach him for it reflects that belief. But the House impeachment vote alone is not enough to preclude him from the ballot,' he said.

So, he was cleared during impeachment but Congress says that is not enough. This is how crazy they are. Calling the SCOTUS Political Whores.....

Meanwhile, political commentator Keith Olbermann wrote on X that the Supreme Court 'betrayed democracy.' 'Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension.

And collectively the "court" has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate. It must be dissolved.' 'If the political whores on the court are overruling quite explicit language in the constitution to benefit one politician, your "separation of powers" died long ago,' he added.

These people are insane. It also shows you how scared they are because they have seen real polling.

Link

a reply to: matafuchs

House of representatives tried to impeach. Twice attempted, twice acquitted. Details matter.

April 4, 2024

Democrats are concerned about what we've known for months. That is, Joe Biden's physical and mental DECLINE, is accelerating.

Look what's happening to Joe this week, after attempting to "keep up with Trump's pace" last week.

Biden Is Not Well: redstate.com...

Democrats want to get Donald Trump out of the race, more than ever. The news media is trying to help, but it's reaching a point where their corruption will be exposed. Joe Biden will pass out, and they'll all have to describe how they saw it coming, but kept it hidden.