It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ksihkahe
Add in the "mostly ancient texts" and it goes from being a preposterous exaggeration to being a delusional fantasy he hopes his audience is too ignorant to question.
I get my fill of people with delusion ego-inflating fantasies right here. No need for multi-hour podcasts.
originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
originally posted by: VariedcodeSole
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: interupt42
However, i did see the Katt and Shannon sharp interview and thought it was interesting to see his perspective of things so look forward to watch the one with Joe.
He talked about reading 60 books a week as his normal routine since he was a kid, and the books he read are not your typical novels. A lot of ancient text that was transcribed. He didn't know who Hancock or Zecharia Sitchin is/was as Rogan knows them, but came with similar information from other directions.
At 60 books a week, most of it being "ancient text that was transcribed", you'd think he would at least be AWARE of Hancock or Sitchin, no?
Not discounting Katt's disclosures, but that seemed to weaken some of the credibility on his part. We all exaggerate or have exaggerated so I'm not holding it against him. He did use it as a qualifier for his apparent knowledge on certain subjects, so it's fair game in my book, no pun intended lol.
I like Katt but I have to agree that he seems to exaggerate on 60 books a week. Maybe he did it once and that’s his great accomplishment that he likes to boast about, but I don’t think you’re retaining much reading 60 books a week. That’s like 8-9 books a day. I’ve read one a day, but 8 would be insane.
How you can talk about the Annunaki and not know Sitchin is beyond me. Maybe he doesn’t retain names like he does facts, or he just watches a lot of YouTube and plays like he read about it. From what his talking points he says the same things Billy Carson does, but he doesn’t know the subject as well. For example he knew to talk about the Emerald Tablets of Thoth but needed for them to bring it up on Wiki to explain them.
Could also be he was just really high.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: whyamIhere
I’ve met Katt. He is not well liked in comedy circles.
He calls out Will Smith and it’s pretty bad.
Look it up on YouTube.
Not ATS friendly.
Was that before or after Will's slap?
originally posted by: whyamIhere
All over the Country people think they can confront entertainers.
originally posted by: Justoneman
One a day max of normal books is my speed in my youth, unless it was some super small ones that technically are a book. Things like Dune were more complicated to read in just a day. Isaac Asimov's "Foundation" was too cool to read that fast. I liked some books so much I would daydream about the concepts. I loved to wrap my head around the science part of the science fiction pieces I read. But Katt is exaggerating, IMO.
originally posted by: EdumakatedHe's been around awhile but never really crossed over out of the black community to mainstream.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
So, I really didn't know who Katt was, and it seems he gained popularity lately on the net, and I saw a couple of clips that I didn't really like with the way he talked a little weird. I never saw his comedy before and so I kind of blew him off. Then I saw that Joe Rogan had him on and I thought I would give him another try if he was on Rogan... BOY, I listened to the whole 3 hours over two days and I will most likely listen to it again since it had so much information in it.
My disclaimer is I don't believe in all he talked about, but he had a ton of logical sense in what he said. He is definitely on my radar now and I will continue to follow him more. Even Joe never talked to him before and they had both been in the comedy small circle and it seems Joe was a little nervous at first, but it got good.
This below is here on ATS back in 2012 and would be a good pre-read before Rogan.
Katt Williams exposes 2012 and illuminati?
I can't believe no one else is talking about him....
originally posted by: Lanogaxeh
P.S. watching a podcast as compared to listening(audio only) can be really insightful. ..body language..
Peace&Respect.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
a reply to: whereislogic
I love your enthusiasm, but your posts are too damn long...lol
...
originally posted by: whereislogic
...
Proverbs 1:20-33
...
24 Because I called out, but you kept refusing,
I stretched out my hand, but no one was paying attention,
25 You kept neglecting all my advice
And rejecting my reproof,
...
originally posted by: Xtrozero
a reply to: whereislogic
...
I'm saying this because you put so much effort into them while most here don't really care. ...
LOOK in a mirror. What do you see? At times, a glance in the mirror reveals in your appearance an embarrassing flaw that you are glad to correct before others notice it.
The Bible is much like a mirror. It can help us acquire an honest view of ourselves, which will prevent us from thinking too much—or too little—of our worth in God’s eyes. (Matthew 10:29-31; Romans 12:3) Additionally, the Bible can reveal flaws in our words, deeds, or attitudes that we need to correct. When this happens, will you ignore what the mirror reveals?
Says the Bible writer James: “If anyone is a hearer of the word, and not a doer, this one is like a man looking at his natural face in a mirror. For he looks at himself, and off he goes and immediately forgets what sort of man he is.”—James 1:23, 24.
In contrast, James describes another man, one “who peers into the perfect law that belongs to freedom and who persists in it.” (James 1:25) The Greek word translated “peers” means to stoop beside or to bend forward to look. “More than a fleeting glance is at issue,” says the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. The word implies a careful search for a hidden object. “There is something important which the viewer desires to see, even though it may be difficult for him to see it and grasp its meaning all at once,” writes Bible commentator R. V. G. Tasker.
Will you thus scrutinize yourself in the mirror of God’s Word and then conform to what it requires? James continues: “This man, because he has become, not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, will be happy in his doing it.”—James 1:25.
originally posted by: whereislogic
...
OK, technically that's not a prophecy, I changed the example Jesus used at Matthew 15:8,9 to make it a bit more applicable to this scenario (and what I mentioned at the beginning concerning "figurative darkness", a later edit).
...
...
Knowledge (gno'sis) is put in a very favorable light in the Christian Greek Scriptures. However, not all that men may call “knowledge” is to be sought, because philosophies and views exist that are “falsely called ‘knowledge.’” (1Ti 6:20) ...
... Thus Paul wrote about some who were learning (taking in knowledge) “yet never able to come to an accurate knowledge [...] of truth.” (2Ti 3:6, 7)
“A fool will believe anything.”—PROVERBS 14:15, TODAY’S ENGLISH VERSION.
Rather than denoting a person who is lacking in mental ability, the word “fool,” as used in the Bible, generally refers to an individual who spurns reason and follows a morally insensible course out of harmony with God’s righteous standards. ...
... The fool despises wisdom and discipline. (Pr 1:7) Instead of heeding counsel, the fool continues walking in a way he considers “right in his own eyes.” (Pr 12:15) He is quick to take offense and bursts out in disputing. (Ec 7:9; Pr 20:3) ...
...
The “inexperienced ones” are those who are naive, easily persuaded, or deceived. (Prov. 14:15, ftn.) ... Think, for example, of the millions who are being misled by religious or political leaders. Some are horrified when they learn that they have been fooled by such leaders. But those mentioned at Proverbs 1:22 choose to remain inexperienced because they like it that way. (Jer. 5:31) They enjoy following their own inclinations and do not want to learn what the Bible says or to be held accountable to its standards. Many feel as did one devoutly religious woman in Quebec, Canada, who said to a visiting Witness, “If our priest has misled us, it will be his fault, not ours!” We certainly do not want to imitate those who are willfully ignorant!—Prov. 1:32; 27:12.
With good reason, the Bible encourages us not to remain inexperienced but to “become full-grown in [our] understanding.” (1 Cor. 14:20) ...
...
The third group of people who reject wisdom are the “foolish ones.” They are foolish because they refuse to live by God’s moral laws. They do what is right in their own eyes. (Prov. 12:15) Such ones reject Jehovah, the Source of wisdom. (Ps. 53:1) ... But they have nothing better to offer. The Bible states: “True wisdom is unattainable for a fool; he has nothing to say in the city gate.” (Prov. 24:7) The foolish do not have any words of genuine wisdom to offer. No wonder Jehovah warns us to “stay away from the foolish man”!—Prov. 14:7.
originally posted by: whereislogic
...
lol, 'reading 60 books a week', how can anyone fall for that one (an obvious lie, false story; also for obvious reasons, "boastful" is the 3rd character attribute ascribed to people "in the last days", 2 Tim 3:2)? Isaiah 5:21, Proverbs 1:22,29,30, 2 Tim 4:3,4, Heb 5:11-14, 2 Tim 3:7, John 3:19-21, 1 Tim 4:1,2 and Proverbs 14:15 explain again (all "beneficial teaching").
...
originally posted by: whereislogic
A 3 hour long video filled to the brink with nonsense, filth and figurative darkness presented as light? Weren't you one of the ones who felt the need to point out my comments were too long some weeks ago? (when I was considering quitting ATS before reaching 6000 comments, I obviously decided not to)
Yep it was you...
]originally posted by: Xtrozero
a reply to: whereislogic
I love your enthusiasm, but your posts are too damn long...lol
It would take about 5-10 minutes to read through the 2 comments filled with "beneficial teaching" (2 Tim 4:3,4) you were responding to (depending on how fast you read and whether or not you run the few music videos in them concurrently with that, to listen to some tunes while reading). But 3 hours of crap, oh sure, not a problem, we've all got 3 hours to waste feeding on that (certainly saves some effort on your part to present something of actual benefit in a well thought out comment, that isn't limited to pointing out what's the matter with someone else's commentary* when you don't wanna hear it anyway as per 2 Tim 4:3,4). *: you said: "You might have some interesting points in your posts but I just do not want to read through it all finding them." (that's not the real reason why you didn't want to read through them, the real reason is described at 2 Tim 4:3,4, John 8:43-47, Matt 13:13-15, Pr 1:22,29,30, Heb 5:11, John 3:19-21 and a bunch more such texts; see next comment for the ones I won't quote here)
27 When what you dread comes like a storm,
And your disaster arrives like a storm wind,
When distress and trouble come upon you.
originally posted by: whereislogic
lol, 'reading 60 books a week', how can anyone fall for that one (an obvious lie, false story; also for obvious reasons, "boastful" is the 3rd character attribute ascribed to people "in the last days", 2 Tim 3:2)? Isaiah 5:21, Proverbs 1:22,29,30, 2 Tim 4:3,4, Heb 5:11-14, 2 Tim 3:7, John 3:19-21, 1 Tim 4:1,2 and Proverbs 14:15 explain again (all "beneficial teaching").
lol, 'reading 60 books a week', how can anyone fall for that one (an obvious lie, false story; also for obvious reasons,
The world’s fastest reader record belongs to Howard Stephen Berg, popularly referred to as Speedy Berg. He read over 25,000 words per minute in 1990 and set the record at 80 pages per minute.