Another Georgia election fraud claim turns to vapour

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Non-sexual affection is scary.

This statement leads me to believe you are not concerned with Bidens recorded actions with children.

Are you concerned with videos that show Bidens actions with children?

Not at all.

None of them appear to portray anything outside the law or immoral.

I just thought he was a confused old dude who was trying not to topple over.

I could cast aspersions on Turpid, too, If I chose:

How candidates kissing babies became a major part of US political campaigns.

a reply to: chr0naut

Wow.


You even admit it.


I think we're done having conversations now.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Wow.

You even admit it.

I think we're done having conversations now.

Thank you. Go away quickly.

a reply to: chr0naut

Oh, I'm not going anywhere.

I'll be here to remind the entire site that you are ok with the recorded actions of Biden and minors.


What is over is me giving you any benefit of the doubt and conversation/debate on topics.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

Actually, if ballot stuffing did not occur, it sort of does.

We need to ask ourselves how does a person who didn't campain got 82 million votes breaking all records. I bet some liberals thought, oh crap we got too much, people will look now.

I don't think it was so much as a vote for Biden, but rather more as a vote against Trump.

I personally witnessed real vote harvesting back in 2002. In Littlerock AR they drove school buses around and picked up the homeless and poor and took them to the voting booth. Why school buses, well we know the liberals run the education system. On the school bus, they would tell the people after you all vote liberal we will give you lunch money on the ride back and they would give them like 20 bucks for "lunch".

Do those citizens who are down-and-out not get a vote?

Who fronted up the hundreds of thousands of dollars of lunch money? Cause to swing a national vote you'd need more than a few busloads. And even if they voted for the Reeeeeeeeeeeeepublicans, anyway, how would the people on the busses know? Seems like they would be taking a big chance.

Come forward in 2020 they don't even need to physically pick people up just get their ballots, or buy ballots mailed out as 170 million based on old voter rolls never cleaned up. In the past, it didn't matter if voter rolls were not cleanup as people still needed to physically go in person to vote, but in 2020 170 million ballots were mailed out to who knows where, and you do not think the Democrats knew that right up front.

The reason why the Democrats vote harvest is because they are doing it mostly in the big cities where one person could hit 100s of households a day just walking, and Republicans would need to drive from house to house and get maybe 10% if they tried.

Add in the vote-counting centers are in those big liberal cities and are basically run by liberals. What this means is something as simple as not looking too hard on a ballot that is for Biden could add a ton more to him that would not be there if given proper inspection.

It was a perfect storm for the liberals, but of course, none of this is provable in court because there were no investigations to begin with and why would the liberals investigate?

It seems like a very expensive way to do things. I'm sure there would be cheap and non-convoluted ways to just lie about the count if it is all that easy.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI

If they are still investigating or lining up charges, you think they should say that before it happens?

What an odd thing to say in the light of 90 some charges...

Did you know about Trump's investigation before they served the search warrant? I sure didn't. Heck, guess who broke that story? Trump himself.

Charges are public. Investigation details before charges are usually not.

a reply to: frogs453

Yes, I recall it starting with "Russia Russia Russia!"

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: chr0naut

You should begin mentally preparing yourself now, because Trump is coming back with a vengeance, to exact vengeance, with the help of tens of millions of supporters.

Yeah, threats and accusations, that's the way!

Zis time around, he vill drain ze swamp and brink on ze tru Union!

Last time the degenerate dems tried to game the system Trump got three Supreme Court justices. 🤣

What a victory. Remind me, again how that is going for him?

Trump opts against appealing civil immunity claim in Jan. 6 lawsuits to Supreme Court

You can’t expect zero consequences when you keep stepping on rakes.
Dems never were good at seeing consequences.
They lack common sense and morals.
Enjoy your rakes!

I'm not an American.

Hopefully, it will make little different to me whomever wins, but I do feel for those across the pond who are stuck there.

a reply to: Astyanax

From your source:

One of its attorneys wrote that a complete response would require True the Vote to identify people to whom it had promised confidentiality.

The State Election Board refused to shelve the complaint and went to court to force True the Vote to turn over information.

In addition to names, the judge ordered True the Vote to provide copies of any confidentiality agreements it had with sources.

It sounds like True the Vote is trying to protect their sources from additional witch-hunts from corrupt officials and Kangaroo courts.

You know, spare them from being prosecuted by people who do things like campaign on getting Trump and not sleeping with subordinates, then sleep with subordinates.

Yes because the President Obama warned Russia about the meddling, an investigation was then warranted. Then,
Trump fired Comey over this "Russia stuff", so then a special counsel was assigned and come to find out, with the numerous charges and convictions, there was meddling, and multiple Trump campaign people were charged and found guilty of various crimes.

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI

If they are still investigating or lining up charges, you think they should say that before it happens?

What an odd thing to say in the light of 90 some charges...

Did you know about Trump's investigation before they served the search warrant? I sure didn't. Heck, guess who broke that story? Trump himself.

Charges are public. Investigation details before charges are usually not.

Ah Yeah , about those 91 " Charges " . None of them are based on " Facts " or Evidence . How about you let a Lawyer Explain it to you...

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: Astyanax



From your source:

One of its attorneys wrote that a complete response would require True the Vote to identify people to whom it had promised confidentiality.

The State Election Board refused to shelve the complaint and went to court to force True the Vote to turn over information.

In addition to names, the judge ordered True the Vote to provide copies of any confidentiality agreements it had with sources.

It sounds like True the Vote is trying to protect their sources from additional witch-hunts from corrupt officials and Kangaroo courts.

You know, spare them from being prosecuted by people who do things like campaign on getting Trump and not sleeping with subordinates, then sleep with subordinates.

So the proof is "just trust me bro"? You're upset that people who broke into offices, hacked machines, fraudulently signed certificates of ascertainment, now face charges? That usually happens when you commit crimes.

GOP witnesses, judges, prosecutors, random election workers have all been doxxed by Maga, threatened, etc., they still speak or testify.

It's more likely, to quote the infamous Rudy, "We have lots of theories, we just don't have evidence."

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI

If they are still investigating or lining up charges, you think they should say that before it happens?

What an odd thing to say in the light of 90 some charges...

Did you know about Trump's investigation before they served the search warrant? I sure didn't. Heck, guess who broke that story? Trump himself.

Charges are public. Investigation details before charges are usually not.

Ah Yeah , about those 91 " Charges " . None of them are based on " Facts " or Evidence . How about you let a Lawyer Explain it to you...

Ah, yes as in the MAL case, in the affadavit as was presented to the Grand jury, testimony from witnesses, and his attorneys, text messages, surveillance video, emails, all not "fact" in Maga world.

Just imaginary stuff.

originally posted by: frogs453
Yes because the President Obama warned Russia about the meddling, an investigation was then warranted. Then,
Trump fired Comey over this "Russia stuff", so then a special counsel was assigned and come to find out, with the numerous charges and convictions, there was meddling, and multiple Trump campaign people were charged and found guilty of various crimes.

Yet, no charges for Biden(s) yet.


Amazing what you'll swallow whole.

a reply to: JinMI

What did I state was false? Obama spoke out, Trump spoke about Comey, a Special counsel was assigned, There were not 30 some people indicted? Some pleas, and some found guilty? Some Trump pardons? As a result. I mean, those things actually happened in the real world.

a reply to: frogs453

Even taking your words at face value, we see a clear disparity in application of the law(s).


Do you disagree?

a reply to: frogs453


" Just imaginary stuff."

Of Course it is *Counselor . Thanks for the Confirmation .

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: frogs453

Yes, I recall it starting with "Russia Russia Russia!"

I recall that the mafia link allegations, racial discrimination case against the Trump real estate business, the accusation of Trump's alleged paedophilia and of his paedophile sex parties, the violent assault where he ripped her hair out and then raped her, brought against him by his former wife and rape charges by other women, and also, I think the Stormy Daniels payments were earlier.