Mac addreses from humans

a reply to: annonentity

Professional, what?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

"D'oh!"

Doom porn monger obviously.

Fecking growth industry these days imho.

a reply to: andy06shake

Sadly, yes

Still, Spurs won, so there is some hope?

originally posted by: annonentity

Here we have an experiment where a vaccine is injected into a vial of human blood, after a while unless they are completely BSing it puts out a MACaddress what a great way to check if you have taken your medicine. rumble.com...

Can you explain what powers it if it is just a vial of blood?

I kinda get it when its stated the body generates electricity but when you say the dead put out MAC addresses still and now just a simple vial, what is generating the power?

Are you suggesting there is a battery within the Vax?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Good'good

Tottenham was my English team when I was a lad.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Well deny it with logic , take it to bits, and put our minds at rest. Explain the phenomenon?????? www.bitchute.com...

I'll explain it clueless people trying to prove a half baked theory. So let's look at their experiment they bring people up 1 at a time suddenly they see a Bluetooth device. Buy the odd thing is even when the people leave those devices are still there. Next he flat out admits in the video he can't get the same results twice this is rule number one on any experiment it has to be repeatable. His excuse is well the energy is used up so it only works once. Ummm yeah they would tag you with an identifier that only works once that makes no sense. Now to connect with Bluetooth isn't easy and requires energy. The more energy it has the longer its range if they are trying to claim an internal thing injected would even produce a milliwatt your insane. Even half a milliwatt if you injected billions of nanites you would literally be in trouble as it interferes with the bodies nervous system.

So let's say they has it lower than a milliwatt OK so what is it going to work 6 inches from the person? Not very effective. And let's not even go into the program which is required to connect to Bluetooth there is a handshake and it requires a program to run. If we had nanites capable of this we would have already cured every major disease on the planet and solved the problem of people getting older. You would be able to create a society that can't die and doesn't age.

In other words the tech would make a lot of money and to use it just to track people would be stupid.

Now why would these people lie simple to make money snake oil salesman have been around for centuries.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Well deny it with logic , take it to bits, and put our minds at rest. Explain the phenomenon?????? www.bitchute.com...

It's hard to take anything from bitchute as factual; it's so far up Qanon's anal sphincter it smells like MAGA p.

and rumble is a joke as well. You can't prop up a position using agenda driven BS.

Would you take politico or Raw Story as gospel? See how that works?

a reply to: andy06shake

COYS!

a reply to: lilzazz

You can't polish a turd?

a reply to: annonentity

So, your response is?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: lilzazz

You can't polish a turd?

Clever connection!!

a reply to: annonentity



It's a good tune annonentity.

Listen to the words, it's not like you have not heard them before.

a reply to: dragonridr

In other words the tech would make a lot of money and to use it just to track people would be stupid.

Considering the smartphones and devices we choose to wear of our own free volition the question as to why seems rather relevant.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

My response is don't take it all too seriously, it is all on the internet where most of it is BS anyway. On this site, we look for a good conspiracy to run with, it is what one does. On the one side at the moment we have the "We are all going to die folks" and on the other "The vaccine is safe and effective" The truth is always found somewhere in between the extremes. If this is true then we still have a problem which still needs addressing.
As far as Nanotech goes the patents are there for anyone to look at. The Internet of Things does require an internal chip, none of us would have one inserted voluntarily which leaves a taste that they would have to insert one involuntarily.
So what to believe? well, that's simply nothing until you see it with your own eyes until then it is a probability like the weather forecast.

a reply to: annonentity

There are patents for lots of things form free energy devices to dangerous sex toys.

Patents are ""legal protections"" granted to inventors for their ""innovations"".

They don't necessarily guarantee that the invention will become a reality or be commercially successful.

They're not the sole determinant of whether an idea will see the light of day in the real world as unfortunate as the case may be.

a reply to: annonentity

if you are connected to any internet portal, phones, laptops etc.

most people carry at least one of those 2 things i listed cell phone and laptops, that means you are willingly carrying around the best bug that could be created with you for most of the day

with the right analytics you could trace a persons movement is pretty much real time

originally posted by: IndieA
Okay, first as a skeptic:

It would be nice to see some more videos of these unknown MAC addresses and experiments to isolate them.

For those who have watched square things "build" themselves in blood samples, realize that those square things could just be salt crystals forming over time.

From a research standpoint:

Nanotechnology has been in development for some time and there are patents for internal sensors. I'm would assume that there has to be a way to communicate with these sensors, and I would assume that, that way is radio frequency. Bluetooth Low Energy maybe?

What I discovered:

I downloaded a coupe of Bluetooth scanning apps, but last night while at home, they didn't find anything other than the Bluetooth speaker I turned on.

I found some information online that said that your phone can do a better job of scanning for signals in developer mode, which was fairly easy to turn on, but I do d have to look it up. After doing this, I didn't pick up anything new.

Now, with it being daytime and hearing people in the condo above me, I tried again.

I found a MacBook, some headphones, and two other devices that I couldn't recognize, so no big deal right?

Then I realized that I saw an option in the developer settings that said, Show Bluetooth Devices Without Names.

So I selected it, then went back to my phone's BT scanner, and now I can see about an additional dozen MAC addresses.

Some of the apps seem to give more information, but I only got 1 out of 3 of them to show me additional information, but for only about half a dozen signals. I haven't tried very hard though, and I'm not trying to spend too much time on this, but I will likely play around some more later.

Some of the MAC addresses had an option to connect while others said unconnectable:

Now, I wouldn't go so far to say that these are coming from people, let alone mRNA vaccinated people, but I would say that this is an interesting phenomenon that warrants further investigation.

I'm thinking that one of the next things I need to try, is to get away from any nearby people and things, then see if I pick up any MAC addresses. Maybe I can try this later today.

I spent more time experimenting with this new found scanning power today, than I would like to admit, but I got some other things done too.

I can confirm a couple of findings:

1. IndieA is not emitting a Bluetooth Low Energy signal or MAC address, and IndieA has also never been injected with a mRNA vaccine.

2. I am picking up a lot of unidentified BT signals in public and around people in general.

3. I picked up a lot of signals in Walmart including phones, smart watches, smart TVs, smart signage, as well as dozens of unidentified signals.

4. As I drove by other cars, sometimes I would pick up an unidentified signal or two. My phone wouldn't delete these after they dropped out of range, so I was having to refresh the scanner to remove old addresses, and to help identify the new ones.

I took some screenshots, so I may come back and research some of the MAC addresses I captured. I saw a couple that might be interesting. One started with 00:06:66 for example.

I would also like to find out why some unidentified addresses say unconnectable.

a reply to: UpIsNowDown2

I kinda get it when its stated the body generates electricity but when you say the dead put out MAC addresses still and now just a simple vial, what is generating the power?

Are you suggesting there is a battery within the Vax?

There are microcircuits that can be powered by external RF signals, which appear to be everywhere these days, plus most of the unidentified addresses seem to be from Low Energy Bluetooth technology.

a reply to: IndieA

Their range is about a few millimeters to a couple of feet IndieA.

Your dog probably has one in his neck aka pet MicroChip.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: IndieA

Their range is about a few millimeters to a couple of feet IndieA.

Your dog probably has one in his neck aka pet MicroChip.

Personally, I haven't seen any evidence that dead people are generating MAC addresses, yet, but not much surprises me anymore.

As for me today, no dog, and the only electronics I had with me was my phone and car keys.

I went out to the corner of a field and verified no BT signals.

As I crossed over the field, back near some people who were still several hundred feet away, I start to pick up signals again, some of which started with two numbers and were unidentifiable.

In any case, I would like to know what's generating so many unidentifiable addresses.

The French doctor in one of the videos claimed that 86% of his mRNA vaccinated patients had MAC addresses, while none of his unvaccinated patients had them. Source

In a secluded area, I pasted a guy on a motorcycle and got these two addresses, if anyone wants to look them up:

Assigned Numbers



And just a reminder, I had to be in developer mode to access these extra addresses.