Tucker Carlson in Moscow; reaction of Western and Russian media

a reply to: Kenzo

They asked my opinion - I answered. For links, please contact the League of Sexual Minorities)))))

a reply to: RussianTroll


Here`s the links


Nobel-winning Russian editor: ‘I know Gershkovich, he’s no spy’

'Sending A Signal': Russian Spy Accusation Against U.S. Journalist Further Escalates Soaring Tensions

Gershkovich is hostage, he was set up just to make a trade later , getting some criminal Russian out from American prison .

a reply to: Kenzo

And I don’t care about the opinion of some editor. Some Russian, some English. I believe the facts.

a reply to: RussianTroll

Here in America we’re too busy to think. We let the TV do that for us. It’s just easier that way. Also thinking can be scary

Personally I like tucker and I think an interview with putin would be fun to watch.

originally posted by: Maybenexttime
Personally I like tucker and I think an interview with putin would be fun to watch.

Here are some highlight bullet-points from Tucker's Interview of Vladimir Putin earlier today...

Source: gettr.com...

IMO, Putin would be a better U.S. President than Joe Biden is.

Intelligent Commie vs Deranged Commie.

a reply to: WeMustCare

dont you have to be born in America to be POTUS?

Perhaps you meant an American in the style of Putin would be more to your liking?

a reply to: WeMustCare

Any one of the Muppets would be better?

a reply to: WeMustCare

IMO, Putin would be a better U.S. President than Joe Biden is.

Do you not see the irony in hating the Clinton’s and Obama’s for making a few hundred million out of politics (which is a rightful complaint)… only to hyperbolically say that possibly the richest man in the world who’s also never worked in the private sector would be better?

Or complaining (rightfully so) that the left has used certain elements of society like the media to get an upper hand in the elections while Putin literally has state run media?

Or that (rightfully so) the DOJ has been politicized to go after a rival while one of Putin’s Rivals just cheated death after being poisoned and is now in a Siberian prison?

Another big difference is Russia hasn’t had the luxury of trying out different flavors. They’ve had one for two and a half decades, Putin.

originally posted by: RussianTroll
Now he is in Russia, where the star of world political television journalism gets to know Moscow for several days. Tucker went to the ballet “Spartacus” at the Bolshoi (he studies the applied issue of slave revolt, no less), walked through the exhibitions of Russian regions at VDNKh as part of the magnificent exhibition “Russia”, went down to the metro and charged his smartphone via USB there, marveled at the connected Wi-Fi, excellent had lunch and dinner, exchanged a few words with the reporters rushing after him as he walked.

He marveled huh???
Is the metro the only place he could access a USB to charge his phone?
I doubt it was dying and I doubt he had any interest in WIFI.... Let alone how fast it is....
Can't make this stuff up man.
ahhh well thanks for making my day full of joy!

originally posted by: UpIsNowDown2
a reply to: WeMustCare

dont you have to be born in America to be POTUS?

Perhaps you meant an American in the style of Putin would be more to your liking?

Any President who scares the shi't out of IRAN and those Hoochie and Hamass proxies, I'd rather have, than crooked Joe Biden.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare

IMO, Putin would be a better U.S. President than Joe Biden is.

Do you not see the irony in hating the Clinton’s and Obama’s for making a few hundred million out of politics (which is a rightful complaint)… only to hyperbolically say that possibly the richest man in the world who’s also never worked in the private sector would be better?

Or complaining (rightfully so) that the left has used certain elements of society like the media to get an upper hand in the elections while Putin literally has state run media?

Or that (rightfully so) the DOJ has been politicized to go after a rival while one of Putin’s Rivals just cheated death after being poisoned and is now in a Siberian prison?

Another big difference is Russia hasn’t had the luxury of trying out different flavors. They’ve had one for two and a half decades, Putin.

You hate people who make money in politics? Clintons/Obamas were merely taking advantage of free market capitalism. The same free market that is causing Hillary to sell her books at a 90% discount now.

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare

IMO, Putin would be a better U.S. President than Joe Biden is.

Do you not see the irony in hating the Clinton’s and Obama’s for making a few hundred million out of politics (which is a rightful complaint)… only to hyperbolically say that possibly the richest man in the world who’s also never worked in the private sector would be better?

Or complaining (rightfully so) that the left has used certain elements of society like the media to get an upper hand in the elections while Putin literally has state run media?

Or that (rightfully so) the DOJ has been politicized to go after a rival while one of Putin’s Rivals just cheated death after being poisoned and is now in a Siberian prison?

Another big difference is Russia hasn’t had the luxury of trying out different flavors. They’ve had one for two and a half decades, Putin.

You hate people who make money in politics? Clintons/Obamas were merely taking advantage of free market capitalism. The same free market that is causing Hillary to sell her books at a 90% discount now.

I don’t think using publicly held office as a means to financial gains is free market capitalism.

It degrades the office.

But I must say it is interesting seeing you suddenly change your stance just because the context is Putin would be a better leader than some of the ones we’ve had.

I suppose it’s not too surprising though. I know you’ve had a very hardline stance against Iran. Russia and Putin are arguably their biggest ally and military partner. You are very vocal about Iranian proxies, but for some reason their biggest ally would be a great leader for the US.

a reply to: RussianTroll

I debated for a brief moment or three about composing a topic regarding Tucker's visit to Moscow and after seeing several headlines with no substance, I decided against it. Now that I've read your comments and insight, I'm glad I did. You are without a doubt better positioned to read into the situation. Can't wait to see Tucker upload footage of, or at least describe his encounter and dialogues with, President Putin and as Harvey would say "the rest of the story" which legacy media is vehemently allergic to. And I hope to read your reaction if he does.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Putin is not a good person. Not a leader worth emulating but he is a leader of one of the largest nations on Earth.


My question is that why are folks who agree with the above so worried about what he may say to an American journalist?


The spirit of the 1st amendment seems to waver for some folks.

*Also Oliver Stone who appeared on Colbert's show.....

a reply to: JinMI

Obviously Tucker is a communist disciple receiving his instruction on exactly how to poison American audiences from the misinformation and war mongering guru.

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: JinMI

Obviously Tucker is a communist disciple receiving his instruction on exactly how to poison American audiences from the misinformation and war mongering guru.

Well played Bezmenov...well played indeed!

a reply to: JinMI

My question is that why are folks who agree with the above so worried about what he may say to an American journalist?

Because they’re babies who can’t efficiently argue their stance, so they’d rather silence people who don’t get upset when they hear views that don’t align with them.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: JinMI

My question is that why are folks who agree with the above so worried about what he may say to an American journalist?

Because they’re babies who can’t efficiently argue their stance, so they’d rather silence people who don’t get upset when they hear views that don’t align with them.

Bah.

You and your.....your logic.

pffft.