The really disturbing part of the possible recorded Keri Lake thing

Pianopraze did a thread on this topic here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

In that thread, there is a recording that is very troubling. Not in the meat and potatoes of what this was about, but the underlying implications.
Then need Keri to sit out two years. Just two years. Then she can do whatever she wants. So what is going to happen in the next two years? Well, unless something drastic happens, it looks like Trump will be the nominee, and unless Biden fixes both the economy and the border in the next 7 months, Trump will be president.

Something much bigger than just another 4 years of Trump is at play here. We already know what that will look like. Even the haters understand what reality will look like, they just have to play the cards they were dealt and made hyperbolic claims about democracy ending and life as we know it stopping in an instant. And this is a world wide thing, not an isolated "left vs. right US" thing. Listen to what's being said all over the world.

Davos, the world leaders had a meeting on what to do if Trump won. Again, they already know what he will do. Same things he did before. Energy sector will thrive, border will be closed, lefties will hyperventilate and claim he's killing kittens at the border. And he won't be plunging into a war. Oh wait, no war? But that's not the direction we are heading. Everything that is currently happening seems to be all about slowly creeping into more war. We must need one to rid the world of many useless eaters. The poor folk. The one's who actually go to war. They have done a bang up job reducing the population of both Russia and Ukraine.

For those of you who just aren't smart enough to think on your own, do a little exercise. When you are all by yourself, and nobody will know what you are thinking, ponder on why you are cheering for this. Are you in the upper tier of society? Are your friends and family immune to the ravages of a war? If not, what do you stand to gain by a war? If you like the answers you come up with, I suppose you can just continue on the path you have been on. But if the answers you come up with scare you a little, maybe, possibly, there is a remote chance, your direction is wrong.

Remember, it's OK to hate Trump, and still not want a war.

a reply to: network dude

I have to admit I'm cynical of this whole story.

This guy decides to call and bribe a woman he knows is unlikely to accept a bribe she would know could destroy her political career permanently if it got out.

What's more curious though, is that he didn't give a moments thought to the possibility that he might be recorded and outed for the corrupt politician he is? I'm not buying it. Something isn't adding up, unless he really was that naive or desperate. In that case, wow.

ETA:

So what is going to happen in the next two years?

Good question. What makes her role so pivotal they need her out of the way for that long?

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: network dude

I have to admit I'm cynical of this whole story.

This guy decides to call and bribe a woman he knows is unlikely to accept a bribe she would know could destroy her political career permanently if it got out.

What's more curious though, is that he didn't give a moments thought to the possibility that he might be recorded and outed for the corrupt politician he is? I'm not buying it. Something isn't adding up, unless he really was that naive or desperate. In that case, wow.

I agree it looks suspect, but in that same light, for Lake to do this and not have the truth and facts on her side is a really quick way to commit political suicide. If we see a lawsuit announced in the next day or two, then we can find out if she made this up out of whole cloth. But remember, these folks aren't where they are because they are super smart, there are there because they are champion toe suckers.

I think Keri is smart enough not to pull something this stupid. Could be wrong, and just a tiny bit of time will tell.


eta:
But in the light of this being real, do you have any thoughts as to what the "two year" thing is about?

a reply to: network dude

War is a great, big, beautiful thing...to a crooked real estate developer. It's what they do...I mean, right? And our current "Walter" Dunham's just as twisted....

About a tiny country declaring war on the U.S....to quickly surrender, n get free rebuilding of their country.
"The Mouse that Roared"- Peter Sellars movies...

1959..we been doing this "war for new real estate" since before that. This is business. Not bodies. Bodies mean future $$$ in societal "dis-agreements".

Maybe someone is aware of ANOTHER bribe she accepted but realises it wouldn't come to light without scrutiny. This latest much more obvious incident may be a pointer for that scrutiny to happen perhaps.

a reply to: network dude

But in the light of this being real, do you have any thoughts as to what the "two year" thing is about?

All I've got is another question, which I added to my previous post.

What makes her role so pivotal?
Who would be in that senate seat if Lake didn't run for it?

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: network dude

War is a great, big, beautiful thing...to a crooked real estate developer. It's what they do...I mean, right? And our current "Walter" Dunham's just as twisted....

About a tiny country declaring war on the U.S....to quickly surrender, n get free rebuilding of their country.
"The Mouse that Roared"- Peter Sellars movies...

1959..we been doing this "war for new real estate" since before that. This is business. Not bodies. Bodies mean future $$$ in societal "dis-agreements".

I'm sorry I'm not part of the in crowd. I just can't cheer for this. I've been against war before I got to see it in person, and much more so after. But if it gets OMB, go nuts.

a reply to: Klassified

Yea. That part is what made this stand out to me as well. If she is a nobody and not a threat, then ignore her. But if she really did win the election, and it really was stolen from her, and that comes to light, then the even bigger dive into the 2020 election could prove to show the little #er behind the curtain with his pants down. I still don't know how to try to understand the end game here, but ever since Trump made the deep state emerge from the shadows, they aren't hiding things at all. And the stupid folks on the left seem to be lapping this up. Something is about to pop.

a reply to: network dude

Mornin' my astute associate! I'm against war since I was at Chicago '68 Convention as a hippie. Nothing's changed...but I see it differently now...

Viet Nam we wanted to bring our troops home...crying mothers-pointless deaths in some rice paddy 6,000 miles away. Quickly..we learned the "man" the machine...you know casket makers, funeral homes, florists, rental venues for them...they need business too.

War is big business...it's not gonna end...

God bless ya 🫡

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: network dude

Mornin' my astute associate! I'm against war since I was at Chicago '68 Convention as a hippie. Nothing's changed...but I see it differently now...

Viet Nam we wanted to bring our troops home...crying mothers-pointless deaths in some rice paddy 6,000 miles away. Quickly..we learned the "man" the machine...you know casket makers, funeral homes, florists, rental venues for them...they need business too.

War is big business...it's not gonna end...

God bless ya 🫡

Yes, but being one of the less fortunate people, I don't get paid to celebrate needless deaths, so I suppose I'll just continue to be against it.

This has the potential to be something monumental that could screw all of us, even if you are on the opposite end of the political spectrum. I wish people here could look at this from a neutral perspective, but I suppose that ship has sailed.

a reply to: network dude

Still waking up so huge pound of salt thing..

the only thing that makes any sense is war, they know trump will balk at new conflicts or increasing conflicts, my guess is the war establishment wants a big one to be happening so trump cant stop it.

a reply to: mysterioustranger

Yes, but there is that little problem that Tully Bascum had. With the current protesters hoping up and down screaming, along with the borders as secure as an open field with one guard every 50 miles.The little country might just win.

Then what do we do?

Edit: I demand to be treated like the NY police officers. Let the general make his own demands.

a reply to: network dude

They're planning on stacking the Supreme Court.

That's why Senate seats are so critical.

They are also planning on Trump not winning.

Maybe they know something we don't. (Obviously)

a reply to: DBCowboy

Yup the stacking makes much more sense, I keep forgetting how bad they want to do that.

I wonder how old this is and when this conversation was recorded.
Ruben ‘all non citizens should vote’ Gallego wants Sinemas seat this year.
He’s a loyal swamp creature.

Lake is polling neck and neck with democratic career politician, Ruben Gallego. The latest 2 polls show her gaining momentum.

Below is an abbreviated outline of Gallego's academic, professional, and political career:[4]
Ballot Pedia
2023-present: U.S. Representative from Arizona's 3rd Congressional District
2015-2023: U.S. Representative from Arizona's 7th Congressional District
2010-2014: Arizona House of Representatives
2012-2014: Assistant minority leader
2009: Vice chair, Arizona Democratic Party
2008: Delegate, Democratic National Convention
2007-2008: Public affairs consultant
2002-2006: United States Marine Corps
2004: Graduated from Harvard University with an A.B.

This guy reminds me of another career politician from my state who served 4 years in the military and got out, in my opinion, just to pad his political resume. Like Gallego, he is another Harvard graduate and served 1 term in the House before running for the Senate. That seems to be the pattern of career politicians these days. The only difference between the 2 is that one is a Democrat whereas the other is a Republican. Truth be told, both are probably dyed-in-the-wool members of the uni-party.

2 years allows enough time for Gallego to be elected and become entrenched in the DC swamp.

a reply to: network dude

Leapin back in a min to this...I'm with you on a lotta things. If you want, I got a cottage in Sudbury, Ontario. I'll drive...you can see the US outline of smoke, mushroom clouds n the US across the lake.

Never thought I'd have to consider riding out the nonsense comin' from over there....If it gets bad....we go. Bring beer, coffee, crucifixes...whatever....cya...(and I seriously hope that's no time soon!).

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

They're planning on stacking the Supreme Court.

That's why Senate seats are so critical.

They are also planning on Trump not winning.

Maybe they know something we don't. (Obviously)

court packing would be an ignorant errand. Dems would make it 13, then when Repubs were the majority, it would go to 15 and so on. Eventually, the 300 person SC would be much more of a punchline than a system of justice.

But as has been said, these aren't the smartest group we have, just the best at promoting themselves as whores to the johns that pay them.

a reply to: mysterioustranger

I'm close enough to Bragg to be vaporized in the first wave. A much better scenario than being in the aftermath.

Of course I hope it never comes to that, but things have never been this #ed up before as far as I know.