Breast cancer rates surging

In these figures from cancer.org, it seems females under the age of forty-five are experiencing an unprecedented surge in breast cancer. For some strange reason, the figures were stable up until 2022 remember these are working-age females. Surely this is another statistic along with the average death rates which should be in the world headlines but are being ignored by the corporate media. Has the snow job reached government stats which should be showing a surge in the average death rates way above the ten percent which seem to be the official figures? It strikes me that unless you are rich and can afford private health care you won't even show up on the stats until it is too late, as these figures alone are enough to overwhelm an existing medical infrastructure. www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: annonentity

I've been hearing about an unprecedented rise in cancer rates, All cancers, includingbreast and colon cancers, among the younger population (under 45) for some time now, through MSM sources.

The increase has doctor's both concerned, and puzzled.

a reply to: annonentity

It's probably the plastics.

And now, coincidentally, Pfizer is gearing up to roll out its cancer drugs.

Pfizer completed its acquisition of all outstanding common stock of Seagen for $229 in cash per share, for a total enterprise value of approximately $43 billion.Text

We believe Oncology will be a significant growth driver for Pfizer and contribute meaningfully to the achievement of our near- and long-term financial goals.” said Dr. Albert Bourla, Pfizer Chairman and CEO.

CANCER = $$$$, dontcha know?

originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: annonentity

It's probably the plastics.

Or all the chemicals sprayed on food. Glyphosate to help dry out crops faster…insane.

.

All types of cancer are going up. Usually that is caused by environmental factors. Science created plastics of all kinds, science is creating a ten fold increase in chemicals approved by the FDA to put on foods. Now it is not really science that is at fault, it is a failure of our regulatory system and desire for money that is causing problems that are causing the increase in cancer. We have exposed our population to more changes in environment with a predominance on food chemistry and cleaning chemistry changes in the last twenty years than we have in the last thousand years. Our metabolisms were changed slowly over long periods of time to adapt to changes in the environment and food chemistry. We also live in an electromagnetic bubble from all of the electrical gadgets we now have that can have an impact on cancer and metabolism.

There is little testing done or required on new chemicals reactivity to other approved chemicals in our food supply, yet we jumped from five thousand approved chemicals to around fifty thousand approved chemicals in a decade and a half because they changed the way they approve them. This I found on the FDA site, they explained how they now evaluate stuff and they also mentioned that they just require third party evidence to prove the stand alone chemistry being evaluated. They reduced their researchers I guess. Also the company that licenses the new chemical needs to provide liability insurance on their product for a certain amount of years...I do not remember how many years that was.

Misguided science evaluation is causing the surge in cancer rates. But they will just blame it on Carbon I suppose, they really can't blame it on cigarettes anymore since so many people are getting cancer that never even smoked. One draw back with cannabis, it is more apt to cause lung cancer than cigarettes, it is a carbon compound and not nicotine that causes cancer. Yet a little of that compound actually boosts specialized immune cell numbers to fight cancer in most people. I would link that research from Europe but it seems like it disappeared from our view now after peer review...It included the method of action as to how it works too but it goes against the consensus of the time that cigarettes cause cancer that is accepted as real by most sciences.

Let us blame it on everything else but the thousand pound experimentally drugged Elephant in the room.

It just can’t be that.

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
Let us blame it on everything else but the thousand pound experimentally drugged Elephant in the room.

It just can’t be that.

Do you have something against elephants?

a reply to: rickymouse

Only that the older I get my ears, nose and skin look more like an Elephant’s. I could be a little jealous of younger folk.

a reply to: TheLieWeLive

I think that the ultimate target of a depopulation theory is a woman's reproductive capacity, according to this it has been the case.. and the coverup is that the dead kids are not turning up at funeral homes adding to the average death rates.The toxicity of the spike protein in the placenta.Would have a flow-on on effect to other parts of the body, especially the breasts. Someone is putting out BS either the people on the vid, or the government stats. www.bitchute.com... Gut feeling suggests it is the people who have the most to lose.

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
a reply to: rickymouse

Only that the older I get my ears, nose and skin look more like an Elephant’s. I could be a little jealous of younger folk.

But remember, elephants never forget...so starting to look like an elephant protects you against Alzheimer disease. My problem with getting old is that my hair hardly grows and my top is getting thinner yet I have to trim my nose and ear hairs every week. I do save a bundle on haircuts though, can do a decent job on triming nose and ear hairs myself.

a reply to: annonentity

From:

healthfeedback.org...

"Breast cancer cases haven’t doubled in U.S. women under 45, despite social media claims"


"A video that originated on TikTok and was widely shared on Facebook wrongly claimed that there was a spike in breast cancer cases in 2022. As this review will explain, the video misrepresented the data, and the change in the figure from previous years was due to a different age range included.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) publishes a Cancer Facts & Figures report every year, which provides projections of the number of cancer cases and deaths expected for the coming year. This differs from reports from organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which gather the actual number of cases that occurred during past years.

The ACS reports don’t suggest that breast cancer cases have almost doubled.

The TikTok video focused on a table provided by the ACS that included the projected cases of female breast cancer for women under 45 in the U.S. However, the video didn’t explain that this was a projected figure rather than actual cancer cases. It went on to highlight that the figures produced by the ACS remained at approximately 26,500 cases each year between 2019-2021.

In 2022, the ACS replaced this table with one that provides data for cancer incidence in the under-50 age group. This projected 47,550 new breast cancer cases in women under 50 and didn’t specify the projection just for under-45s. The TikTok video didn’t explain that the 2022 table is for a different age range than the previous years and instead claimed that breast cancer cases have almost doubled.

The risk of breast cancer rises sharply with age, so the number of cases is expected to increase significantly when older age groups are also included. Real-world national figures for 2022 aren’t yet available. However, the CDC reports that 99,131 women aged 45-49 were diagnosed with breast cancer between 2016 and 2020, an average of 19,826 per year. If a similar number were used in ACS’s projections, it would account for almost all of the difference caused by including this age group in the figures for their 2022 report."

a reply to: TheLieWeLive

Let us blame it on everything else but the thousand pound experimentally drugged Elephant in the room.

The elephant died suddenly and his keepers are baffled.

a reply to: Boomer1947

I would suggest that it is rising so fast that people are still in shock, not only with the rapid onsets but with a failure in reporting. Plus even the ability to see an oncologist is problematic. rumble.com...

There has been an increase in the frequency of every kind of cancer, every year, for decades now.

There has not been a change in the rate of incline since covid vaccines became a thing. Step away from the bitchute.

a reply to: annonentity

An actual Mortician here.

Yes rates have gone up a bit, but so far the only pattern is behavioral. As in some Pacific Islands that did not have the vaccine are seeing the same thing.

For over 2 years we had people not go for check-ups ( which our country had worked hard to get normalized ) and were still open to the public during Covid as we had eliminated the virus twice ( all up for 500 days in 2 blocks ) . Seeing a lot of late stage cancers where the families say they had been sick for a long time.

Also, ( but most not directly related to cancer, but some where . Like estrogen blockers )

We had a relatively large % of people stop taking their prescriptions even though they were free to everyone the entire Pandemic. Even free delivery was available.

Who is to blame ?

The Human Behavior side of Pandemics was not taken seriously by the WHO and Govts globally ( even after warnings by ESR teams ) . So incompetence was to blame.


To add to that though. I would say a wall of cancer is heading humans way anyway, as micro-plastics start showing the cumulative effects and cell functions are interrupted.

I saw a rise in pollution direct cancers long before 2020. And in 2018 I directed some pathologist I know to some standard cases ( not Autopsy cases) , where the thyroids on both sides of the neck were HUGE . I mean they got in the way of my work.

That issue is just getting worse and their are only theories.

Specialist I have contacted are too arrogant to even discuss the issue.

a reply to: Euronymous2625

Please do not attack my sources when they are valid honest assessments by individuals, and from mostly government scientific papers not found on mainstream channels. If I quoted the source websites they would never be found.

a reply to: DEATHANDTRUTH

If you really were a mortician, you would certainly know about the fibrous blood clots found all over the world, 'post jab' even if you hadn't personally. It is very well documented.

There is no question that the jab is the cause. There are thousands of white papers proving the jab is a bioweapon and indisputable data that correlates deaths with jabs.

The games up!

Now is the time for accountability.

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
Let us blame it on everything else but the thousand pound experimentally drugged Elephant in the room.

It just can’t be that.

ATS is slowing down. It took 8 posts before the vaccine was mentioned.