Black Glass UFO Orb Filmed By Military Contractor

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: quintessentone

It’s actually better footage…….then footage of orbs (which may be blinding illuminating) miles high in the sky……

It’s refreshing to see low altitude objects with some definition….imo.

Also he works for a company manufacturing reaper drones, duh, any chance that could have been one of their secret test model drones?

While I worked there…in engineering….I saw no indication….of a product like that being developed. We had several buildings and locations….it could have been a compartmentalized project…..if it’s from GA at all. That area is high desert where there a some other companies in aerospace.

👽

It's out there.

a reply to: quintessentone

Are you saying this noticeably winged sphere is what he saw?…….I’m not exactly seeing the wings….in his vid.

Nevertheless….it could be some sort of orbish balloon.

From my experience….on a stack of bibles….what I saw wasn’t a balloon.

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

A bit quick off the mark as I read it earlier. Sorry.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: quintessentone

Are you saying this noticeably winged sphere is what he saw?…….I’m not exactly seeing the wings….in his vid.

Nevertheless….it could be some sort of orbish balloon.

From my experience….on a stack of bibles….what I saw wasn’t a balloon.

👽

What I am trying to point out is that this technology was in the works (secret?) around that time the video was taken. Doesn't it strike you that is what it most likely would be?, considering he works at a drone factory and as you said previously that that desert area has aerospace facilities. What a prime location to test secret or not so secret new technology. Additionally, I'm thinking the material may be a solar capturing film which can look like black glass. Why not use solar technology with this blimp drone technology, if it does exist?

a reply to: quintessentone

Additionally, I'm thinking the material may be of a solar panel sort, or a solar capturing film which can look like black glass. Why not use solar technology with this blimp drone technology, if it does exist?

It’s possible of course…

From wiki….in a general sense…

A solar balloon is a balloon that gains buoyancy when the air inside is heated by solar radiation, usually with the help of black or dark balloon material. The heated air inside the solar balloon expands and has lower density than the surrounding air. As such, a solar balloon is similar to a hot air balloon.

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: quintessentone

Additionally, I'm thinking the material may be of a solar panel sort, or a solar capturing film which can look like black glass. Why not use solar technology with this blimp drone technology, if it does exist?

It’s possible of course…

From wiki….in a general sense…

A solar balloon is a balloon that gains buoyancy when the air inside is heated by solar radiation, usually with the help of black or dark balloon material. The heated air inside the solar balloon expands and has lower density than the surrounding air. As such, a solar balloon is similar to a hot air balloon.

👽

Exactly, and these blimp drones also have propulsion, so who knows what's coming down the pipe spy-wise or surveillance-wise.

I still don't see how the object is labelled as "Black glass"...it alraady sounds identified just by that alone.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

As of this posting the vid you posted was uploaded 3 hours ago……..it’s funny and sad how someone could take someone else’s video…..add music and add a logo….and not crediting the original source. Hopefully the person doesn’t monetize it by adding adds….that would be wrong…imo.

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

clicky bait hucksters circle like buzzards. that's why you can't really trust a damn thing posted on the internet about the subject.

i Wonder how many of these are of Chinese Manfacture.
Seems to be a lot more showing up lately.
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: bluesman023
i Wonder how many of these are of Chinese Manfacture.
Seems to be a lot more showing up lately.
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Currently from AARO website….


👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Sorry.

Try now.

a reply to: ArMaP

🥂
👽

a reply to: quintessentone

Maybe it was really a balloon, as one thing I noticed is that the object appears to be losing altitude.

That's particularly noticeable near the end, when they stop.

If that was the case maybe he should have looked down instead of up when he came looking for it later.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: 38181
Not another black balloon attached to a drone again…

Seriously though, military contractor means jack, as far as we know he could be a porta-potty technician.

Why didn’t he stop, and get out? Most us here would.

It appears to have been early morning (like when I experienced it)…..perhaps he was running late for work…….who knows…

👽

C'mon, really? Late for work? As if seeing a UFO and filming it PROPERLY was not more important?

The way people film these alleged UFOs, to me, is suspect.

It's possible, I know when I had my two sightings, it didn't even cross my mind to record them before they disappeared from my line of sight. I was trying to wrap my head around whatever the hell it was I was seeing.

Looking back, I had time to capture at least a few seconds of each one, but by that point, it would have been like a lot of other UFO videos, where you get a brief look at something that could be anything.

Both my sightings happened at night. The first was a bright..something, that seemed very high up and was moving on a steady trajectory. It looked much like a satellite, but then it moved in a way I can only describe as a "pulse." Quick acceleration/stop, quick acceleration/stop, but rapidly, until it went out of my line of sight beyond some buildings.

My second sighting, it flew right over me, maybe 1-200 yards up. I couldn't make out the shape of the craft, but it had 3 white lights in a triangle, with a flashing red light dead center. It wasn't very fast, but wasn't slow, either. That also moved along until it left my line of sight beyond some trees. It didn't hit me until it disappeared that it didn't make a sound, at all, not even a hum.

So I can buy not getting video of things that leave you standing there perplexed.

a reply to: Schmoe3755

Very good points and I agree.
It's hard to even catch mundane phenomena in the heat of the moment. I love plane-spotting, and sometimes I'll be off guard and not looking for a particular plane, but there it is, and I have no time to capture it on camera.
True story: last winter, I was at a store parking lot when a V-22 Osprey flew overhead. Keep in mind, this was out in the middle of nowhere, nowhere near a military base.

I drove to the nearest airport; a small, untowered strip that hardly sees any air traffic. I watched this V-22 do several touch-and-goes. At the last second after several landings, I decided to take a video. The thing flew off on me, and I was left with 5 seconds of blurry video. I was too much in awe watching this magnificent tilt-rotor doing touch-and-goes at the local airstrip that taking a video was the last thing on my mind.

For that reason, I'm not a member of the "pictures or it didn't happen" crowd. This is also partly because even in cases where there are photos and videos, either they are too vague to get any real information from, or they are too good to be true and are either CGI, AI, or staged in some physical way.

I thrive primarily on data - analysis of patterns of witness descriptions, physical after-effects such as physiological effects or environmental damage, and trends over time (morphology, associated high-strangeness, etc). Since individual cases are, in most cases, nearly impossible to prove (or at least to prove something non-human in nature is behind them), it's better to look at the phenomena holistically (i.e. we're seeing far more spherical UAP than we did in decades past - that's a start).

It's going to be very difficult to use a video or an image as irrefutable "proof" of visitation. Someone will always claim fake, and someone will always make fake videos, or pass videos of mundane phenomena as "ET". Photos and videos aren't as concrete as some researchers would like to tell you.

a reply to: wavelength

Agreed, though I admit I was one of those "pics or it didn't happen" people until it happened to me. There's something going on, I have no doubt of that. Seems we're either being visited, or we made some incredible leaps in flight technology. My second sighting, which reminded me of the black triangles people talk about, didn't really strike me as alien, because the lights on it seemed completely man-made, especially the blinking red light. The only reason it hit me as bizarre, was because of the array of lights on it, and how it made zero sound, on a warm, quiet night.

The illustrations we see of the black triangle, the lights don't seem accurate. The arrangement is, but for some reason they're depicted as being really large lights, but on the one I saw, they looked pretty standard.

I also agree about proof these days, with CGI, there are usually tells, but some of them are pretty good too, and it's subtle discrepancies that expose them. The fakers annoy me.

And those Ospreys, they are such cool aircraft, but I think I like to admire them from a distance, I don't want to be on one lol

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: quintessentone

Maybe it was really a balloon, as one thing I noticed is that the object appears to be losing altitude.

That's particularly noticeable near the end, when they stop.

If that was the case maybe he should have looked down instead of up when he came looking for it later.

Yes, and the first impression from the videographer was that it was a balloon, hence his casual attitude.

Good call on the looking down instead of up.

a reply to: quintessentone

I’m going to agree to disagree on the balloon theory….based on my personal experience a decade ago in the same area. I’ll leave it at that.

👽