It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI
Me contort? That's funny. "Back the blue!" "Just comply" "Law and order!"
Or to quote the President in 2020 of BLM protestors "thugs!" "Just shoot them in the legs or something" "tweeting, "when the looting starts, the shooting starts."
Certainly flipped the script when the heart of the nation is attacked.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
Does everyone remember this Video released a year or more after January 6th ?
Pelosi and Schumer putting on their best acting chops and pretending like they were even in DC on Jan 6th .
I can't believe that anyone actually believed this bull# video for a second.
Progressives care about what serves their purposes. Sometimes it’s war, sometimes it’s protests against war. Like right now, progressives are all about funding the war in Ukraine. When Bush was in office they all voted to go to war, but then pretended they were against it. Strangely, Biden himself took credit for crafting the Patriot Act. They do what they think gets them ahead, which is typical of Marxist ideology… the ends justify the means.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Lazy88
Once upon a time, progressives cared about stuff like that.
As well as being anti war.
originally posted by: tjack
It'd sure be interesting to know how many times the word "insurrection" was used between the usual Dem suspects in their day-to-day communications with each other in the days and weeks leading up to Jan 6. How do we get info like that?
Because to me, them knowing that nothing was ever going to stick to Trump, it smells like this was all cooked up ahead of time specifically to leverage the wording "participated" not "convicted" in that dusty old insurrection clause or whatever it was. They dug and dug until they found some subtle verbiage and an angle, and presto, an "insurrection" was born.
originally posted by: Myhandle
a reply to: opethPA
And 24 hours later, you have zero stars.
Maybe no one appreciates your input.
Maybe no one cares what you think.
Maybe you’re not that important.
Maybe you’re just WRONG.
But the only question that matters to you is: why are you wasting your time? This is your life. Are you getting $$$?
originally posted by: opethPA
It really speaks about what ATS has become that the replies on this thread are all willing to ignore the origin of this story.
Lets talk about that original story, the one broken by The Blaze. What is The Blaze for those that don't know?
Blaze Media is your source for conservative news and information, original reporting and insightful opinions about the stories that matter most.
Hey thats cool, just because its conservative doesn't mean its fake or wrong. SHouldn't be hard to find other sites making the same claim.
Shouldn't be hard just search of either of these should get me lots of results. " Head of Pelosi's Security Detail Allegedly 'Perjured Himself on the Stand'" or even the full article title of " Head of Pelosi's Security Detail Allegedly 'Perjured Himself on the Stand' About Jan. 6: Report"
Searching on either from multiple different search engines only show a very few minor sites , some right wing and this one that talks about the site that broke the story, The Blaze.
Read with caution - this story is only being covered by one news source that has a ‘low factuality’ rating, which means the outlet has a history of poor reporting practices. Learn more about factuality ratings here.
ground.news...
This should be a simple ask for you CareWeMustWeMustCare, can you link just 1 source that isn't a right wing, conservative or clearly biased site that is covering this?
originally posted by: UpIsNowDown2
New revelation from Donald Trump is this him exonerating Nancy Pelosi and revealing the truth, it was Nikki Haleys fault?