It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Does the negative in the headline have that much of a difference?
originally posted by: theatreboy
So, from time to time, I will check out D****e R****t. The headline right now is:
Half of Republicans Didn't want Trump
Half of the Republicans want him, then.
Seriously, if this was Biden, It would have said over half wanted him. a solid majority.
Many will point out the bias in the media. But the media knows that most don't see it, they take the media at their word.
Does the negative in the headline have that much of a difference?
originally posted by: theatreboy
So, from time to time, I will check out D****e R****t. The headline right now is:
Half of Republicans Didn't want Trump
Half of the Republicans want him, then.
Seriously, if this was Biden, It would have said over half wanted him. a solid majority.
Many will point out the bias in the media. But the media knows that most don't see it, they take the media at their word.
Does the negative in the headline have that much of a difference?
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: network dude
As Trump keep ascending, those who watch MSNBC are increasingly sensing that the network has been lying to them, all along.
Justice Sonya Sotomayor made herself look really stupid by parroting what MSNBC said regarding children Covid-19 deaths...192,000 kids on ventilators. The CDC had to straighten both of them out!
originally posted by: theatreboy
So, from time to time, I will check out D****e R****t. The headline right now is:
Half of Republicans Didn't want Trump
Half of the Republicans want him, then.
Seriously, if this was Biden, It would have said over half wanted him. a solid majority.
Many will point out the bias in the media. But the media knows that most don't see it, they take the media at their word.
Does the negative in the headline have that much of a difference?
"A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION. ANY MISTAKE, EVEN IF WELL INTENDED, WOULD BE MET WITH ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT TERM END, EVEN EVENTS THAT 'CROSS THE LINE' MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD."