It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: gigirome
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
well the times I've spoken (telepatically) with some ET, I talked in spanish and italian, as are my main langauges
I know the Guides of Confederations speak aramaic
originally posted by: gigirome
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
well the times I've spoken (telepatically) with some ET, I talked in spanish and italian, as are my main langauges
I know the Guides of Confederations speak aramaic
Sound fidelity: Analog recordings can capture the continuous nature of sound waves, which some audiophiles argue results in a warmer and more natural sound. Digital recordings are based on discrete samples and can sometimes exhibit artifacts like quantization noise.
originally posted by: totemkomph
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
This topic is hard to talk on but long story short no, we would not be able to talk to aliens even if they understand certain gestures like waving they are technically light years ahead of us in knowledge and speech. So probably if we even do understand some word's their using (if we even figure out what it means) it would be even harder to understand a sentence that they try to say. And we don't even know if aliens are real they are just speculated to be living somewhere in the galaxy.
originally posted by: Dreftenq
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
No way we can communicate through some form of language if we consider very different physiologies between humans and aliens.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
originally posted by: Dreftenq
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
No way we can communicate through some form of language if we consider very different physiologies between humans and aliens.
Primal communication basics before the spoken language development included pictographs, petroglyphs, logograms and animated body gestures.
In a hypothetical situation …..if early earthlings had no mouths and neither did extraterrestrials……would they not both resort to any of the above communication methods in an attempt to communicate? Or even a stick and sand or dirt?
I would have……
👽🤔
Physiology is the science of life. It is the branch of biology that aims to understand the mechanisms of living things, from the basis of cell function at the ionic and molecular level to the integrated behaviour of the whole body and the influence of the external environment.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: Dreftenq
Most definitely…..
Physiology is the science of life. It is the branch of biology that aims to understand the mechanisms of living things, from the basis of cell function at the ionic and molecular level to the integrated behaviour of the whole body and the influence of the external environment.
….can have infinite differences in the universe….imo.
To think that lifeforms could be so different….it’s anybody’s guess whether any kind of communication can be attained.
I guess the best scenario for communication would have to start with sentient life forms.
For example…..ant’s may be intelligent for their own species…but have humans made a concerted effort to try and communicate with them? Have ants tried to communicate with humans?
Yet a sentient species that’s industrial enough to produce craft that traverse the universe is much more worthy to attempt communication with….rather than ants.
A good contact movie based on learning communication’s with two different species of life forms either by humans or extraterrestrials was “Arrival” ….if you have not seen this movie….I highly recommend it…because to me …it actually proposes a scenario of different species attempts to communicate.
And it asserts that the physiology differences makes no difference whether human or extraterrestrial. The bottom line is that…imo….all species have curiosity baked into themselves no matter how different all creatures are.
A extraterrestrial could have a thousand eyes…..and we humans and themselves, for that matter, would still try to communicate.
Below…..Physiological differences between humans and Heptapods envisioned in the movie “Arrival”
👽
originally posted by: charlyv
I think that if we encounter an alien civilization that WANTS to communicate with us, then THEY will enable or provide the mechanism that allows that.
We should not assume that our understanding of language or our protocols would be anything that they would deem valid for the obvious gap in intelligence and experience.
Just like the Rendlesham Forest incident, where the small craft supposedly thought transfered a binary message to Staff Sargent Penniston; it used 8-bit ASCII, which is a HUMAN INVENTED numeric translation for alphanumerics (in this case it was for English characters). If the aliens knew that they needed to communicate in English, they why just not use regular letters and words instead of going through the trouble to encode and transmit the binaries for an English ASCII table? Just nonsense.
Reality returns like a cloud passing over the sun. Softly:
ELLIE: You're not real. None of this is.
TED: That's my scientist.
ELLIE: So. Are you an hallucination? Or are little gear trains and circuit boards under your skin?
TED: Am I artifact or dream? You might ask that about anything.
ELLIE: But you're so... I mean how could you possibly...? When I was unconscious. You...downloaded... my thoughts, my memories, even...This beach. I've never been here but I remember... it's how I always imagined...Pensacola.
TED: We thought this might make things a little easier.
And in the blink of an eye they are no longer standing on a beach but on the rim of the Grand Canyon, looking out at a spectacular sunset.
TED: ... although this is nice too.
Ellie tries hard to swallow her amazement as Ted begins to stroll along the rim; she walks with him.
ELLIE: So who -- what -- are you?
TED: Originally just another species like yourselves. Well, not like you at all actually, but...
ELLIE: Can you show me?
TED: Small moves, Captain, small moves.