originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
What is going on this is just bizarro World Is this Bidens way of supporting China ? This guy needs out of office asap .
Taiwan is now on its own Biden just gave China the green light . What a embarrassment on the World stage .
"We do not support independence," Biden told reporters when asked for comment on DPP candidate William Lai’s victory over the rival Koumintang (KMT)
party following Saturday’s election. "
Link
Biden is just restating the "one China policy" that has been the formal US position since about 1971. Trump endorsed it. Obama endorsed it. George
W. Bush endorsed it, etc., etc.
"When the United States moved to recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and de-recognize the Republic of China (ROC) in 1979, the United
States stated that the government of the People’s Republic of China was “the sole legal Government of China.” Sole, meaning the PRC was and is
the only China, with no consideration of the ROC as a separate sovereign entity.
....
The United States did not, however, give in to Chinese demands that it recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan (which is the name preferred by the
United States since it opted to de-recognize the ROC). Instead, Washington acknowledged the Chinese position that Taiwan was part of China. For
geopolitical reasons, both the United States and the PRC were willing to go forward with diplomatic recognition despite their differences on this
matter. When China attempted to change the Chinese text from the original acknowledge to recognize, Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher told
a Senate hearing questioner, “[W]e regard the English text as being the binding text. We regard the word ‘acknowledge’ as being the word that is
determinative for the U.S.” In the August 17, 1982, U.S.-China Communique, the United States went one step further, stating that it had no intention
of pursuing a policy of “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan.”
....
To this day, the U.S. “one China” position stands: the United States recognizes the PRC as the sole legal government of China but only
acknowledges the Chinese position that Taiwan is part of China. Thus, the United States maintains formal relations with the PRC and has unofficial
relations with Taiwan. The “one China” policy has subsequently been reaffirmed by every new incoming U.S. administration. The existence of this
understanding has enabled the preservation of stability in the Taiwan Strait, allowing both Taiwan and mainland China to pursue their extraordinary
political and socioeconomic transitions in relative peace.
....
In the San Francisco Treaty of Peace of 1951, Japan renounced “all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.” Neither the Republic of
China nor the People’s Republic of China were parties to the treaty, and thus neither was declared a beneficiary of the Japanese renouncement.
....
The U.S. position regarding sovereignty over Taiwan remains steady and consistent with its “one China policy”: both sides of the Taiwan Strait
should mutually and peacefully agree to a resolution of this as yet unsettled issue. The United States doesn’t agree with Beijing’s claim to
sovereignty over Taiwan, nor does it agree with Taipei that the ROC is an independent, sovereign state."
From:
www.everycrsreport.com...
Basically, this is one of those agreements that only seems to make sense in diplomat-world. The US does not recognize Taiwan as an independent
sovereign nation, and that keeps the mainland happy enough so that they will do business with us. At the same time, we don't recognize the PRC's
claim of sovereignty over Taiwan and that keeps Taiwan happy enough to do business with us. That allows the US to formally consider the matter
"unsettled". It only works as long as the situation is ambiguous.
"At the same time, the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) of 1979, has governed U.S. policy in the absence of a diplomatic relationship or a defense treaty.
The TRA stipulates the expectation that the future of Taiwan “will be determined” by peaceful means. The TRA specifies that it is U.S. policy,
among the stipulations: to consider any non-peaceful means to determine Taiwan’s future “a threat” to the peace and security of the Western
Pacific and of “grave concern” to the United States; “to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character;” and “to maintain the capacity
of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion” jeopardizing the security, or social or economic system of Taiwan’s
people."
The TRA gives US Presidents cover to set in place the military means to defend Taiwan. That's why Biden stated plainly in the Spring of 2022 that the
US would respond militarily to an invasion of Taiwan by the PRC. That's why he has been systematically taking concrete steps to build up military
capability against China since he's been in office. That includes entering into the US-UK-Australia agreement to give Australia a nuclear attack
submarine capability, building up military bases and forces in Japan, Guam, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and other locations that border the
South China Sea. Also, the Marine Corps, Air Force, and Army are being retooled with the idea of conflict with China being the driving requirement.
They're all getting capabilities specifically designed to be able to confront the PRC if they try to invade Taiwan. While you probably haven't been
paying attention, Biden has actually been systematically putting in place all the infrastructure to confront China militarily, which is what he said
he would do when he was campaigning.