Left-wing climate group is quietly training judges how to handle global warming cases

There's a big organization that's "educating" judges about climate change litigation!

Looks biased and prejudice and is trying to influence courts ahead of anticipated major climate related lawsuits.

Wonder if impartiality is being cultivated and created "one sided".

The seminars are probably omitting the questions many judges may have about actual proof.

Can't imaging why groups like this would be worried about judges actually allowing expert testimony in cases?

What's the REAL purpose with this? Maybe a database is being created to target what the group may see as "problem judges". Maybe they're assembling a list of blackmail and threat targets?

Left-wing climate group is quietly training judges how to handle global warming cases

A little-known judicial advocacy organization funded by left-wing nonprofits is quietly training judges nationwide on how to handle cases related to climate change, according to a Fox News Digital review.

The Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Law Institute (ELI) created the Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) in 2018, establishing a first-of-its-kind resource to provide "reliable, up-to-date information" about climate change litigation, according to the group. The project's reach has extended to various state and federal courts, including powerful appellate courts, and comes as various cities and states pursue high-profile litigation against the oil industry.

"As the body of climate litigation grows, judges must consider complex scientific and legal questions, many of which are developing rapidly," CJP states on its website. "To address these issues, the Climate Judiciary Project of the Environmental Law Institute is collaborating with leading national judicial education institutions to meet judges’ need for basic familiarity with climate science methods and concepts."

Climate Judiciary Project

a reply to: WingDingLuey
Prove it.
The onisis is now in you.

a reply to: DingbatNYer

The communists have proven time and again that they will use every means available to destroy the US.

They're pretty blatant about it.


Edit:

Also the term is "onus"

o·nus
/ˈōnəs/
noun
used to refer to something that is one's duty or responsibility.
"the onus is on you to show that you have suffered loss"

a reply to: WingDingLuey

Yep , Follow the Pseudoscience or Else !












........................

a reply to: WingDingLuey

My guess is 'training judges how to handle global warming cases' includes some very lucrative financial incintives.

originally posted by: DingbatNYer
a reply to: WingDingLuey
Prove it.
The onisis is now in you.

Your Way of Thinking is Now OBSOLETE !

a reply to: WingDingLuey

wonder how they are being taught about being objective and unbiased.in their training. after all justice is supposed to be blind but we all know it's not.
it's about how much justice you can afford.

originally posted by: DingbatNYer
a reply to: WingDingLuey
Prove it.
The onisis is now in you.

what's an onisis?

a reply to: WingDingLuey

Looking like lobbyists are bribing judges that should be recused in climate litigation cases due to prejudiced biases.

Interpretation of law ain't climate forecasting. unless an intended storm is brewing in judges chambers.