It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Imhere
Well, f-16s were planned to be in Ukraine anyway for years.
Considering this goes back for decades with the Clintons/Biden in the 90s, who supported/funded Al qaeda backed Muslim extremists cells in Southern Europe/Balkans. Destabilizing the region further.
Funny how Israel is now dealing with backlashes and calls of genocide. In Israel’s defense Hamas is using human shields. (Shrugs)
It didn’t bother the Clintons/Biden, when the Al qaeda backed Muslim extremists were defecating and demolishing centuries old Serbian Orthodox monasteries in Kosovo in the 90s. Trying to erase it from the region and murdered thousands of Serbian civilians. Yet, only focused on Serbia as the perpetrators.
In fact, NATO BOMBED Serbia for 72days instead. And planted bases in Kosovo. and stripped centuries old sovereign land away from Serbia in 99’.
Now, here comes Putin. Replacing a drunken stooge Yeltsin.
Putin tried to have Russia in the 2000s with Bush have a closer relationship and even have Russia in NATO.
Of course, the truth is that the Military industrial complex makes cash. A lot of it. Can’t have Russia be friendly. Because less business.
Putin and Russia saw this over time. And knew what was coming. More NATO bases/occupied land.
Now here come the f-16s to get sent into the grinder just like the rest of the profitable (not for you) “donations”
originally posted by: JAY1980
3rd generation fighters piloted by pilots with months of training versus combat hardened 5th generation fighter pilots. Good luck Ukraine...
Who do you think will win?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
And based on their performance in the last 2 years, even if Putin decides it's too far, they aren't going to be able to do crap. Air superiority is a priority for anyone fighting. If you don't have air superiority your losses are going to be significantly higher.
And based on their performance in the last 2 years, even if Putin decides it's too far, they aren't going to be able to do crap.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Unknownparadox
And there's at least some evidence that many of their weapons will have issues. The US has a similar numbers of weapons, and spends about $50B a year on routine maintenance. In 2023, the entire Russian military budget was $84B. That's outside the $80B or so spent on the Ukraine war. The 2024 budget has military spending over $100B, but a lot of that is going to replacing and repairing equipment used in Ukraine. Nuclear weapons in Russia don't suddenly work differently, and there's no evidence that they're keeping up on their maintenance the way that it should be.