It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's a balloon, but not just a balloon, it must have something like a drone attached moving the balloon.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: Arbitrageur
It's a balloon, but not just a balloon, it must have something like a drone attached moving the balloon.
Well that I found peculiar because a balloon wobbles, if I was in a blackopp R&D program I would put up some kind of balloon sign and test that thing out ?
But yes it may be a sophisticated prank where they have managed to create a drone like sphere according to our technology and even with aliexpress materials and pull this one off
Or they used the balloon as an overlaying effect to later on edit the whole thing afterwards?
But then using that amazone sign as overlaying effect, that part doesn't stroke with me.
Hopefully the pranksters will on a later time frame explaine their hoax?
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
If something is pushing a balloon like that, it could move like that, but it won't move like that just from wind.
originally posted by: Kosimir
I can't see how a balloon will be moving so fast and in this way if it's a real balloon filled with air.
If you're Ukrainian and you think the Russians who obey orders to invade your country and try to kill you are evil, drones are used to kill those evil people. Sometimes they fly above the Russian trenches and drop grenades or mortar rounds on the Russians. Or drop a mortar round into a tank opening and kill the tank crew inside.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
Seeing the capabilities of these drones is fascinating. It makes me more curious why they are not used to get rid of evil people.
Some Russians refuse to go and kill Ukrainians. They have to spend something like 10 years in prison, but at least Ukrainian drones aren't killing them, they are not evil.
Why is being heavier than the balloon a problem? Quadcopters are heavier than a balloon but they fly just fine.
originally posted by: Farboso
You mean they have attached something on the balloon?
But any device would be heavier than the balloon itself so I am inclined to think this is a spherical drone or maybe there is an edit somewhere.
But another poster has claimed it's not a drone but a CGI prank.
originally posted by: More1ThanAny1
a reply to: 0bserver1
That isn't the wind moving the balloon around, that is just the drone quickly flying up and down, left and right, and its moving the balloon in relation to the background (parallax). That is why it seems like intelligent movement. This video shows an example at the end:
I would like to see more details to support that claim, but however it was done, it looks like some kind of prank.
originally posted by: DaydreamerX
The title is misleading. The object was not 'cruising'.
It is a for fun video. CGI fake. Not even a drone. Superimposed image of a 'drone' with a 'give away' details for emusiment.
If it's a drone attached to a balloon, depending on how it's attached, that could cut down on the wobbling, because drones can be very stable.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
Well that I found peculiar because a balloon wobbles, if I was in a blackopp R&D program I would put up some kind of balloon sign and test that thing out ?
But yes it may be a sophisticated prank where they have managed to create a drone like sphere according to our technology and even with aliexpress materials and pull this one off
Maybe, I'm not sure what they did yet.
Hopefully the pranksters will on a later time frame explaine their hoax?
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Why is being heavier than the balloon a problem? Quadcopters are heavier than a balloon but they fly just fine.
originally posted by: Farboso
You mean they have attached something on the balloon?
But any device would be heavier than the balloon itself so I am inclined to think this is a spherical drone or maybe there is an edit somewhere.
If I understand the hypothesis in this video, it's that yes something heavier than the balloon like a drone which can fly is somehow attached to the balloon and pushes the balloon around:
But another poster has claimed it's not a drone but a CGI prank.
originally posted by: More1ThanAny1
a reply to: 0bserver1
That isn't the wind moving the balloon around, that is just the drone quickly flying up and down, left and right, and its moving the balloon in relation to the background (parallax). That is why it seems like intelligent movement. This video shows an example at the end:
I would like to see more details to support that claim, but however it was done, it looks like some kind of prank.
originally posted by: DaydreamerX
The title is misleading. The object was not 'cruising'.
It is a for fun video. CGI fake. Not even a drone. Superimposed image of a 'drone' with a 'give away' details for emusiment.
I haven't seen anything to rule out either possibility yet.
If it's a drone attached to a balloon, depending on how it's attached, that could cut down on the wobbling, because drones can be very stable.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
Well that I found peculiar because a balloon wobbles, if I was in a blackopp R&D program I would put up some kind of balloon sign and test that thing out ?
But yes it may be a sophisticated prank where they have managed to create a drone like sphere according to our technology and even with aliexpress materials and pull this one off
Maybe, I'm not sure what they did yet.
Hopefully the pranksters will on a later time frame explaine their hoax?
originally posted by: Farboso
originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: Farboso
If it’s not a ballon, then what is it? And why would it be is some video.
Perhaps a spherical drone.
The motion of the object is erratic and very fast for being a balloon. Usually balloons float in the medium they travel (air)
In the first 4 minutes, I can see the possibility for "appearance of motion in the way it was film from a drone" when a lot of the motion is unidirectional (when it looks like the balloon is falling, for example), but when it gets to say 4:10 to 5:15, it seems far less likely to be parallax given how difficult it would be to maneuver the drone with the camera so quickly to create those erratic back and forth and change of direction motions. Watch in particular say 4:10 to 4:20, do you really think that could be parallax? Seems very unlikely to me.
originally posted by: Lazy88
Is it the balloon, or the appearance of motion in the way it was film from a drone.