EU Beginning Investigatory Proceedings Against X

a reply to: some_stupid_name

would advise any country that doesn't like a particular website should just add it to the firewall to be blocked

A bit like assisted book burning.. IS that what the nazis did in the war. You think this is a good idea..?

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: some_stupid_name

would advise any country that doesn't like a particular website should just add it to the firewall to be blocked

A bit like assisted book burning.. IS that what the nazis did in the war. You think this is a good idea..?

Nazi's....?

The question is....do you think it's a good idea....?

www.jpost.com...

www.huffpost.com...

www.theguardian.com...

www.newsweek.com...

a reply to: lilzazz

NO i dont think its a good idea. A free society only works with free speech. All sorts of people have all kinds of views different to my own. Some i like. Some i dont. I would not ban or censor any of them. Futher used an an excuse for narrative control by the cartel..

originally posted by: gortex
they're fine with disseminating disinformation as long as it is they who are doing it.

^^ THAT. 1,000 times that.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: some_stupid_name

would advise any country that doesn't like a particular website should just add it to the firewall to be blocked

A bit like assisted book burning.. IS that what the nazis did in the war. You think this is a good idea..?

How is it that assisted? They would have to edit their exclusion rules on their equipment. I'm arguing it's not X's responsibility to edit their content based on any other nations rules.