It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
17% of mail-in voters admit that in 2020 they voted in a state where they are “no longer a permanent resident”
21% of mail-in voters admitted that they filled out a ballot for a friend or family member
17% of mail-in voters said they signed a ballot for a friend or family member “with or without his or her permission”
8% of likely voters say they were offered “pay” or a “reward” for voting in 2020
Taken together, the results of these survey questions appear to show that voter fraud was widespread in the 2020 election, especially among those who cast mail-in ballots. According to election data, more than 43 percent of 2020 voters cast ballots by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.
The poll of 1,085 likely voters was conducted from November 30 to December 6, 2023. Among those surveyed in the poll, 33% were Republicans, 36% were Democrats, and 31% were “other”; 32% were 18-39 years old, 46% were 40-64 years old, and 22% were 65 or older.
(wikipedia)
James M. Taylor is president of the Heartland Institute, a libertarian and conservative[1] nonprofit think tank founded in Illinois in 1984
Joseph Lee Bast is an American right-wing political activist. He is the former president and CEO of The Heartland Institute, an American nonprofit conservative and libertarian public policy think tank based in Arlington Heights, Illinois.
originally posted by: IndieA
I'm fairly certain that the minor illegalities mentioned in this poll, ocure every election,
The Heartland Institute is a militant, libertarian, conservative "think tank" based in Chicago and founded by Joseph L. Bast, a former janitor and drop out of the University of Chicago. The infamous group's regular global warming conference "feels like a low-level, alt-right rally,' a journalist at The London-based paper The Independent recently noted.[1]
A report in the Paris-based newspaper LeMonde Diplomatique indicates that research in Europe shows Heartland is working with 'far right, racist groups' to advance its policy agenda globally. [2]
Leading media consider the comments, studies, and social media postings of Heartland personnel to be informational "pollution," or outright propaganda, not meriting serious consideration in the national policy debate, according to The New York Times. [3]
Popular Science reports that Heartland's disinformation campaigns have been designed to transition the discussion over global warming from the realm of science policy to the embattled and embittering 'culture war.' [4]
originally posted by: frogs453
On a random poll I might just admit to all of them just for the heck of it. Then watch everyone get riled up.
originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: quintessentone
Again, do your own comprehensive and open-minded research, people.
Good idea👍
Rational wiki is neither comprehensive nor open minded LoL
Seid has funded climate denialism as well as a national network of state-level think tanks that promote business deregulation and fight Medicaid expansion. He’s also supported efforts to remake the higher education system in a conservative mold, including to turn one of the nation’s most politically influential law schools into a training ground for future generations of right-wing judges and justices.
Last month, The Lever and ProPublica as well as The New York Times detailed how Seid secretly handed a $1.6 billion fortune to a key architect of the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority that recently eliminated federal protections for abortion rights.
Steven Baer, a longtime friend and former adviser to Seid, said the businessman has long been “the major patron” for the Heartland Institute, a small Chicago-area think tank which for decades has attacked mainstream climate science. A top executive at Seid’s former company, Tripp Lite, served as the chairman of the group. Among the recent claims on the institute’s website: “US Temperature Readings Are Junk, Negating Climate Science” and “96% of U.S. Climate Data Is Corrupted.”
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: quintessentone
Oh boy!
Commie leftist propaganda groups don't like opposing views!
Who would thought?...
originally posted by: frogs453
On a random poll I might just admit to all of them just for the heck of it. Then watch everyone get riled up.
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: FlyersFan
Heartland seems suspect to me
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: frogs453
On a random poll I might just admit to all of them just for the heck of it. Then watch everyone get riled up.
I'm sure everyone thinks just like you.
Sampling is a science, so you do a good number of samples to make sure people like you don't matter in the end. for 95% confidence you only need 385 samples in our population, for 99% you need a little over 16,000.