25% of COVID Vaxxed Now Have VAIDS, Cambridge Scientists Warn

a reply to: chr0naut

Some peeps seem to just find fine being autistic.. others not so well.. a massive increase in cases over the last decade too.

happy days

originally posted by: kwaka
For another interpretation of what this scientific paper is about and what it means:

Here’s the simple version. The researchers discovered that a necessary ingredient in the mRNA vaccines, 1-methylpseudouridine, has an unfortunate side-effect; it messes up RNA translation one-third of the time by slipping a gear every so often. Instead of making the intended spike protein, these tiny mis-translational slip-ups create … other things. Other kinds of proteins. New ones.

And there’s no way at all to predict what kind of protein it will create. It’s stochastic – completely random.

expose-news.com... mmune-responses/

From Wikipedia: N1-Methylpseudouridine

The translation is stronger than its naturally occurring analog uridine. That is part of the reason that N1-Methylpseudouridine was selected for use as a replacement for uridine in the mRNA.

Frameshifting does occur during translation, but frameshifting also occurs with viral induced translation, as well as with natural translation of naturally produced RNA sequences, too. Our immune system is built to destroy the alien frameshifted proteins, just like it does with the un-frameshifted alien spike protein.

They did note experimentally that while the Bnt162b2 vaccine does produce frameshifted proteins, that the T cell response was greater than in a comparative non-mRNA immunization (ChAdOx nCoV-19) one that should not produce frameshifted proteins: Here is the paper - N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting .

And while the occurrence of frame-shifted proteins is probably stochastic (which actually contradicts the 1/3rd of the time production claimed in the expose-news article. There is no mention of any specific observed frequency of occurrence in the paper, and the paper said that the occurrence of frame shifting noted was low, which also contradicts the commentary article), the types of protein produced is not random. The frameshifting is only +1 (as per the paper's title) and this occurred at only two locations and so the shifting of the frame only produces one alternate protein at each location, and therefore three possible frameshifted proteins (one or the other or both), not a plethora of possible alternate proteins at random.

In the expose-news article paragraph quoted, there are several errors in fact. Expose-news is a pseudoscience anti-vax misinformation site.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: chr0naut

Meaning, in the end, it could very well attack...itself?

In some viral infections, they do cause the immune system to target some parts of the immune system as the HIV virus does in AIDS.

But neither the immunizations, nor the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor the spike protein that binds to human ACE-2 receptors, does that.

originally posted by: visitedbythem

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: visitedbythem
A couple months ago, my dad was talking to one of my cousins. I think she is 70. She told him she was diagnosed with aids. It was not acquired sexually. I didnt understand how she could get it, but my dad said other things could cause it too. We had thought she passed on the vaccines. That was what she said after they were available. She did eventually get 2 shots. Im not sure which ones. We both suspected that it was the MRNA injections.

Worldwide, 13.53 billion doses of COVID-19 immunizations have been administered.

If the immunizations caused AIDS, and it has been administered subcutaneously where it directly interacts with the blood, why aren't there 13.53 billion cases of AIDS?

Because there aren't that many people on Earth. The shots are not all the same. Test run. Some are placebos, others have all different levels of crap in them

And yet you are also ascribing the same very specific issues to all of this allegedly random stuff?