It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Public schools in Portland now have to take students' gender identity and race into account before disciplining them as part of a new collective bargaining agreement that ended a month-long strike.
Portland Association of Teachers union called off industrial action after securing a 13.75 percent raise for educators over the next three years last week.
The agreement has made waves in the fine print, however, as it appears students will now have race and gender identity taken into account when it comes to punishing them.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
So if you engage in vandalism, you won't get punished if you are black or trans, but you will be punished if you are straight and white. That's certainly what it looks like. What a woke mess Portland public schools are. I feel sorry for the people who have to go there. The folks running them have the woke mind virus and are screwing everything up.
originally posted by: Scratchpost
Are school shootings mostly white kids?
I wounder why.
Not all pupils are equal.
Indeed.
originally posted by: BrucellaOrchitis
a reply to: andy06shake
It was part of a negotiated pay deal.
As I understand it, it is about recognising that some children can end up being punished twice, once by teacher, then at home. This allows teachers to use their discretion where necessary. Not all pupils are equal.
Well. If teachers can discern vulnerable students and encourage them to identify a certain way and then hide their gender beliefs from friends and family, why would they stop there?
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis
Not all pupils are equal.
Quite clearly according to this....but they should be.
Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.
Please explain why you feel teachers are qualified to discern just who is and who isn't eligible for punishment and what grounds and criteria are used?
originally posted by: SteamyAmerican
Well. If teachers can discern vulnerable students and encourage them to identify a certain way and then hide their gender beliefs from friends and family, why would they stop there?
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis
Not all pupils are equal.
Quite clearly according to this....but they should be.
Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.
Please explain why you feel teachers are qualified to discern just who is and who isn't eligible for punishment and what grounds and criteria are used?
You do realise some children live in abusive households don't you?
Again, abusive parents.
Why make a child's life any harder than it is if you don't need to?
Big assumption there amigo.
originally posted by: BrucellaOrchitis
originally posted by: SteamyAmerican
Well. If teachers can discern vulnerable students and encourage them to identify a certain way and then hide their gender beliefs from friends and family, why would they stop there?
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis
Not all pupils are equal.
Quite clearly according to this....but they should be.
Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.
Please explain why you feel teachers are qualified to discern just who is and who isn't eligible for punishment and what grounds and criteria are used?
Again, abusive parents. Why make a child's life any harder than it is if you don't need to?
Boom.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: SteamyAmerican
Teachers should concentrate on teaching.
Yes, they have a duty to safeguard student well being but they should not engage in gender identification and other associated bollocks.
Teachers are teachers and not Social Workers or Psychologists.
Are school shootings mostly white kids?
I wounder why.
Unless of course that pay raise stipulates these new responsibilities. Which of course requires more schooling.