The Gateway Pundit Access Restricted at the Pentagon and House of Representatives

Access to the The Gateway Pundit has reportedly been restricted at the US House of Representatives and at the Pentagon.

EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Matt Gaetz Sends Letter to House Admin Chair Asking Why The Gateway Pundit is Being Blocked on House Computers, Requests Answers by Dec. 12 – LETTER INCLUDED

“Congressional staff and members have been restricted from accessing The Gateway Pundit on the House network for weeks,” said Gaetz in a letter to the House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil, while asking what policy we violated, what other outlets are censored, and when this issue will be resolved.

An individual working for the Air Force in the Pentagon also reported similar access restrictions through our tip line. In fact, multiple individuals told The Gateway Pundit that the Air Force, DOD, and federal government are suppressing our voice. This has been happening for weeks, according to sources.

On Tuesday afternoon, Congressman Matt Gaetz followed through on his promise to investigate the censorship in the House by contacting House Administrative Committee Chair Bryan Steil and demanding answers.

This raises some questions:

What other websites are having their access restricted, and why?

Are there any ATS members who can confirm this restricted access at either location?

Has access to ATS become restricted at these locations, or have employees of the federal government been told that accessing ATS (an opensource think-tank) is restricted.

What websites probably should be restricted at these locations, but aren't?

a reply to: IndieA

They are a private comp....

Errr....

Well, this is embarassing.

Lot's of "weaponized/politicized" infiltrators inside the gov i.t. departments.

This was no error. 🚬

Have them present a lawsuit with the same judge CNN went when they kicked that activist reporter let them show the double standards

Censorship Masquerades and Disinformation Control

The spread of any totalitarian regime begins by silencing everyone with a dissenting voice and finally all the people are silenced in one way or another from questioning the party line.. Free speech is the first freedom citizens lose.

Step by step the New world order continues to advance their sick full control of information...

any idea that can not be questioned is nothing more than a weak attempt a propaganda

"We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." - William J. Casey, the 13th CIA director...

SPAM

It's blocked at work along with Fox News. It should be straightened out in a few days they say.

originally posted by: IndieA
Has access to ATS become restricted at these locations, or have employees of the federal government been told that accessing ATS (an opensource think-tank) is restricted.

Doubt it. ATS is very small and obscure. I'm sure it doesn't have that kind of attention.

I haven't read the article, but I assume that they have blocked it on their internet server, and is only a problem while on their network. I personally believe that is wrong, however, if you can't figure that out and fall for it, you probably aren't looking at all available information or questioning anything that comes across your desk. If that's the case, you're useless and should be terminated.

Otherwise, you can buy a dedicated hotspot device and use your own secured WiFi connection and maybe even have the government or company pay for its use as a normal expense. Can't do that? I imagine there are hotspots aplenty in DC and other major cities, do your research outside the office at a bar or coffee shop and save it for use later. Let's not forget that everyone has a smartphone and they could just use their own connection instead of the House WiFi and likely get that paid for too.

originally posted by: mikell22
It's blocked at work along with Fox News. It should be straightened out in a few days they say.

. . . and it only takes 3 minutes to unblock them ⚠️

a reply to: IndieA

The website seems to have a lot of syndicated advertising.

Perhaps there was some malware?

Perhaps the site has a clear history of supporting extremist right-wing terrorist organizations?

Perhaps it was a misclassification that put it, or one of its affiliated sites, on an international blocklist?

Perhaps the senator, instead of writing a letter, could have clicked the link on the block page to contest the block, and resolved the issue without making a big issue out of it?