It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source: nypost.com...
IRS special agent Joseph Ziegler told the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday that Hunter Biden’s overseas influence peddling operations have enriched the First Family and their business associates to the tune of more than $17 million.
The funds were raked in through various multimillion-dollar payments made by foreign nationals to Biden family-linked corporations between 2014 to 2019.
The Biden family’s business dealings involved entities in Ukraine, Romania and China.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: WeMustCare
I read that house speaker Mike Johnson have enough vote to proceed with the impeachment inquiry.
Let see if that is true.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
Sunday, December 3, 2023
...
Even though an FBI Informant says Joe/Hunter split $10,000,000 from one source, and the IRS says...
Source: nypost.com...
IRS special agent Joseph Ziegler told the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday that Hunter Biden’s overseas influence peddling operations have enriched the First Family and their business associates to the tune of more than $17 million.
...
The Biden family’s business dealings involved entities in Ukraine, Romania and China.
The central/primary question boils down to, What did Hunter & Joe Biden do to receive tens of millions of dollars from individuals and companies in Ukraine, Russia, China, and smaller nations?
.....
-WeMustCare
originally posted by: Boomer1947
Joe is not mentioned.
Stop your incessant lying.
"Comer has identified nine members of the Biden clan — including first son Hunter Biden, the president’s brother James Biden, his brother’s wife, Sara Biden, the widow of the president’s late son, Hallie Biden, Hunter’s current wife, Melissa Cohen Biden, and Hunter’s ex-wife, Kathleen Buhle — as having allegedly received foreign income."
Joe is not mentioned.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: WeMustCare
I read that house speaker Mike Johnson have enough vote to proceed with the impeachment inquiry.
Let see if that is true.
He's trying to do things the official, formal way. Nancy Pelosi didn't have a vote before starting the first Trump Impeachment Inquiry. She didn't even have an impeachment inquiry before impeaching Donald Trump the second time...just 4 months after the firs time!
originally posted by: matafuchs
Joe Biden and his family profited off his time in office. That is not illegal. What is illegal would be the why?
Votes? Influence?
Bought and paid for.
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: Boomer1947
"Comer has identified nine members of the Biden clan — including first son Hunter Biden, the president’s brother James Biden, his brother’s wife, Sara Biden, the widow of the president’s late son, Hallie Biden, Hunter’s current wife, Melissa Cohen Biden, and Hunter’s ex-wife, Kathleen Buhle — as having allegedly received foreign income."
Joe is not mentioned.
Are you telling us the whole family are making out like bandits except for "the big guy"? Joe should be pissed. That just ain't right.
originally posted by: bruce88
originally posted by: Boomer1947
Joe is not mentioned.
Stop your incessant lying.
How can they? They have admitted they are paid to post, and if they stopped lying they would have nothing to post about President Biden and Hunter!
originally posted by: marg6043
Speaker Johnson says he believes GOP has the votes for BIDEN impeachment inquiry
www.cnn.com...
CNN— House Speaker Mike Johnson said Saturday he believes Republicans have the votes to launch a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.
“I believe we will,” Johnson told Fox News of a GOP-led impeachment inquiry. “I suspect no Democrats will assist in this effort, but they should.”
Johnson added Republicans “have a duty to do this” and “we cannot stop the process.”
Republican leadership and key GOP committee chairs on Friday made the case for why they believe an inquiry vote is necessary, arguing it would strengthen their legal standing in court and accusing the White House of “stonewalling” their probe into the president and his son’s foreign business dealings – a claim the White House has forcefully rebutted.
Johnson, appearing alongside House GOP conference chair Elise Stefanik, claimed the inquiry wouldn’t be used as a partisan political tool.
“Elise and I both served on the impeachment defense team of Donald Trump twice, when the Democrats used it for brazen partisan political purposes. We decried that use of it. This is very different,” Johnson said.
“Now we’re being stalled by the White House because they’re preventing at least two to three DOJ witnesses from coming forward” and withholding evidence from the National Archives, he continued.
“A formal impeachment inquiry vote on the floor will allow us to take it to the next necessary step, and I think it’s something we have to do at this juncture.”
originally posted by: hangedman13
a reply to: Boomer1947
And what do we have to go by? Joe's word? We have no evidence he didn't enrich himself either. We do have a lot of suspicious monetary activity by Joe and his extended family. They play the game to not prove their innocence. We the American people deserve answers to this. But no, we get vague assurances about Hunter and his "art dealing" and all sorts of questions about the money Joe and the rest have received. Funny that so much was flagged by the IRS and no investigations were done until recently! Just the "loan repayment" alone stinks to high heaven. Any other person transferring that amount would be having the IRS looking out their mouths from being investigated so in depth.