It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A Nov. 14 survey by a West Bank polling firm asked Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank what kind of state they wanted to establish: one state for two peoples garnered the support of 5.4 per cent of respondents; a two-state solution was supported by 17.2 per cent; but the clear-winner, with 74.7 per cent in favour, was a “Palestinian state from the river to the sea.”
A reminder for those who haven’t been on a pro-Palestinian march recently: this phrase means a Palestinian state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean — with no Israel in between.
When protesters chant, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” it is not, as some suggest, an aspirational cry echoing the hopes of Palestinians for freedom from Israeli occupation, it is — according to this poll — the clear expression of the genocidal intent of most Palestinians (three out of four people), who want to obliterate Israel from the map.
Israel and the existence of the Jewish people and sovereign state of Israel.
Of course, Palestinians are not the only ones advocating a “river-to-sea” discourse. It has more or less been the official policy of the Israeli state since 1967, when it occupied the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights. Since then, every Israeli government has pushed for the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, rendering the two-state solution an impossibility well before the Oslo peace process began.
Within the Israeli political space, from the far-right to the liberal left, the idea of sharing the land with the Palestinians as equals was never on the table.
The problem Israel has faced – like other settler-colonial powers – has been that Indigenous populations rarely if ever go gentle into that good night. Revisionist Zionism founder Ze’ev Jabotinsky would not have disagreed with Tlaib’s argument in the immediate aftermath of the Hamas attack, that the “suffocating, dehumanising conditions” of permanent occupation inevitably “lead to resistance”.
Exactly a century ago, in his 1923 manifesto, The Iron Wall, he advocated overwhelming Jewish power to turn Palestine from the river to the sea into a Jewish ethnostate precisely because of the inevitability of Palestinian resistance.
IDF. He managed to escape from there. He tried to reach the border, but because he didn't have the means to understand where he was and where to escape - he got into trouble in the field. He was there alone for 4 days, hiding and at the end the Gazans caught him and returned him to the hands of the terrorists.
originally posted by: Insurrectile
a reply to: DBCowboy
I've picked a post to add perspective.
Do you have problems with the question?
originally posted by: Insurrectile
a reply to: DBCowboy
The whole project is moot as well then, essentially doomed to fail without Freedom of Speech and stuff. Right? RIGHT?
Oh wait! This is the other DBC, the post 7th version. Nevermind.
originally posted by: Mahogani
a reply to: DBCowboy
At what cost, DB?
I understand supporting Israel and the Jewish people, I do too. But I do not support that agenda at the cost of thousands of innocent civilian lives.
Do you? Is it worth genocide for Jewish people in Israel to feel "safe"?
Do you support co-existence, or just the existence of one side?
originally posted by: Insurrectile
‘From the river to the sea’ and the decolonisation of our collective future