originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
Bidenomics (spoken in a whisper).
...
Nope.
There was an interesting article that came out a couple of weeks ago that asked the question "How Biden’s Economy Stacks Up Against Every President
Since 1963".
www.gobankingrates.com...
The article looked at a handful of the traditional economic indicators such as GDP growth, unemployment rate, and inflation.
Between 1963 and now the Presidents were: Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969), Richard Nixon (1969-1974), Gerald Ford (1974-1977), Jimmy Carter (1977-1981),
Ronald Reagan (1981-1989), George H. W. Bush (1989-1993), Bill Clinton (1993-2001), George W. Bush (2001-2009), Barack Obama (2009-2017), Donald Trump
(2017-2021), Joe Biden (2021-Present). That's 5 Dem Presidents and 6 Repubs. Dem Presidents for 29 years and Repub Presidents for 32 years. So the
Presidency was pretty equally distributed between Ds and Rs for that 60 year time period.
Here's the interesting thing: the variables of GDP growth, unemployment, and inflation went up and down within some limits, but (in my opinion) did
not show much correlation with D or R Presidents. For example, inflation under Biden has been about 5%, but it was higher under Nixon, Ford, and
Reagan. GDP growth was highest under Carter, but so was inflation. Unemployment was lowest under LBJ at 3.4%, but almost the same (3.5%) under
Biden. In other words, the party of the President doesn't seem to matter much for those economic indicators. They are much more influenced by
external events, such as an Arab oil embargo, Dotcom bubble bursts, housing market crashes, or world-wide pandemics.
But here's the most interesting thing--the disposable income per capita in constant 2023 dollars (adjusted for inflation):
Biden: $46,557
Trump: $48,286
Obama: $48,811
Bush Jr.: $49,141
Clinton: $53,895
Bush Sr.: $54,005
Reagan: $60,887
Carter: $67,143
Ford: $95,602
Nixon: $110,961
LBJ: $130,520
In other words, the real purchasing power of the average working person is today only about 35% of what it was in 1963! Is it any wonder that
families need 2 earners working more than one job each, just to get by?
And it didn't matter which flavor of President was in office--R or D; disposable income went down every Presidential term for the last 60 years.
Meanwhile, the disposable income of the top 1% has grown at greater than the GDP growth rate. Why is that?
A RAND Corporation report from 2020 examined this in detail:
www.rand.org...
They showed that the main reason for this redistribution of almost 50 Trillion dollars to the wealthiest 1% is the adoption of "trickle down" tax laws
in which it is assumed that if you give billionaires a tax break they will pass along some of the crumbs to the bottom 99%.
Turns out that's bull# and it was a choice we made as a society. It wasn't that way for the 25 or so years after WWII, in which the working class
income mostly matched GDP growth. Those are the days that most Trump supporters long to return to, when a single worker without a college education
could buy a house, raise a family and have a '57 Chevy in the driveway.
If you want to help out us peons in the bottom 99%, you've got to have tax laws for which that is the actual goal.