Get Out Of New York Now

The headline is just warning , which i see justified in this case. In the last round, some horrific events happened In New York , people were cold blood murdered by local health authoritys....





Appellate Court Reinstates New York Governor's Power to Enforce Quarantine Rules

Another link with video

They can now take you away for mandatory quarantine and isolation for any virus at their sole discretion. No court date, no option to fight it. No age limit and no time limit for your quarantine. And they can use any experimental treatment on you.

Wall Street Silver X

The New York Supreme Court on Nov. 17 dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the isolation and quarantine procedures the state established during the COVID-19 pandemic, saying the Republican lawmakers and the advocacy group that brought the case lacked standing to sue.

The suit was originally filed in April 2022 against Gov. Kathy Hochul and her administration by a coalition of Uniting NYS and three Republicans: state Sen. George Borrello, Assemblyman Chris Tague, and Assemblyman Michael Lawler, who is now a member of the U.S. Congress.

The coalition challenges what's known as Rule 2.13, a set of regulations that gives state and local health authorities the power to place New Yorkers merely suspected of having an infectious disease such as COVID under mandatory isolation or quarantine.

Under the February 2022 rule, "whenever appropriate to control the spread of a highly contagious communicable disease, the State Commissioner of Health may issue and/or may direct the local health authority to issue isolation and/or quarantine orders, consistent with due process of law, to all such persons as the State Commissioner of Health shall determine appropriate."

The isolation locations, according to Rule 2.13, may include one's own home, a general hospital, or "other residential or temporary housing," subject to what the health agency issuing the order deems "appropriate." The rule also allows the health agency to, "whenever appropriate, coordinate with local law enforcement to ensure that such person comply with the order."

"Rule 2.13 is a red flag that underscores the lingering authoritarian approach to governing, which is a holdover from the pandemic," Mr. Borrello said in a statement, arguing that those regulations, made through a rule-making process as opposed to a legislative process, violated the principles of separation of powers enshrined in the New York State Constitution.

"The unprecedented emergency powers given to the Executive Branch became the 'new normal' for two years and gave rise to certain abuses, like this dangerous isolation and quarantine regulation," he added. "If we allowed that to occur unchallenged, it would invite further overreach."

In a ruling handed down in July, New York Supreme Court Judge Ronald Ploetz sided with the plaintiffs, effectively rendering those public health rules null and void. New York Attorney General Letitia James appealed that ruling.

On Nov. 17, however, the Fourth Department of the New York Supreme Court's Appellate Division overturned Mr. Ploetz's ruling, saying that the three current and former state lawmakers have failed to prove a "direct injury" caused by the alleged violations.

"The legislator petitioners specifically alleged that respondents violated the separation of powers doctrine because the ability to make laws lies with the legislature," a panel of five judges wrote in the opinion.

"Inasmuch as the legislator petitioners merely asserted an alleged harm to the separation of powers shared by the legislative branch as a whole, they failed to establish that they suffered a direct, personal injury beyond an abstract institutional harm."

When it comes to the legal standing of Uniting NYS, the judges concluded that the organization "failed to demonstrate that at least one of its members would have standing to sue."

"The organization petitioner did not claim that any of its members had been personally subjected to isolation and quarantine under any regulation," the opinion read.

They also noted that the affidavits provided by some Uniting NYS members concerning the potential impacts of an isolation and quarantine order on fellow New Yorkers failed to "articulate any direct injury" other than "the injury every citizen allegedly suffers" from the Hochul administration's action.

"We conclude for the same reason that the organization petitioner lacks standing to bring the challenge in its own name," they added.

The decision, according to the 5-judge panel, will not shield Rule 2.13 from court challenges in the future. "Inasmuch as the legislature retains its power to address the regulation and there exists a large pool of potential challengers to the regulation who could assert a concrete and particularized harm, we conclude that this is not a case where to deny standing to these petitioners would insulate government action from judicial scrutiny," they wrote. Uniting NYS expressed frustration over the ruling, saying that the appellate court "shamefully overturned our win." "They have ruled against the will of the people," Bobbie Anne Flower Cox, the attorney representing the petitioners, wrote on her Substack page. "The court seems to insinuate that the only person with the right to sue is someone who has been forcibly locked in their home against their will, or ripped from their home, taken from their loved ones, and thrown into a quarantine detention center, facility, institution, camp, etc.," Ms. Cox wrote, calling such logic "flawed." "My legislator-plaintiffs were injured because Hochul and her DOH stole the legislators' power to make law," she argued.

a reply to: Kenzo

So anyone considered an enemy of the state can disappear under the quarantine law. Don't they realize that includes the governor and everyone else involved in the charade as well?

a reply to: Kenzo

And people think Trump is going to get a fair shake??

Sure.

Lol. (but not funny.)

Standing up or on your knees....let's see what people do and don't do before we get too anxious. Any wagers on whether apathy will seize the day once more, or will a united citizenry put their collective foot down?

My money is on apathy because they wouldn't even try this kind of 💩 if they were worried about the repercussions.

2024 definitely won't be boring. That's a certainty.

a reply to: annonentity



I doubt they include themselves with this plan, they will just quarantine everyone else they decide . When people are taken, they might also give them mRNA DEATHVAX™ ...

a reply to: VariedcodeSole

Yep, bad vibes about 2024 ..

a reply to: Kenzo

That Sorry Excuse for a Governor in NY is Nothing but a Globalist Tool of Anti American Propaganda . It will take the Entire State of NY to Clean Up NYC's Mess Now ........

a reply to: Kenzo



Case in Point , NYer's are Led by Scumbags...........

" Lawsuit: Democrat New York State Sen. Kevin Parker Accused of Raping Woman "



www.breitbart.com...

a reply to: Zanti Misfit


It`s a sh-ithole place with Scumbags at helm .

I hope those that enforce this and their families are hunted down and brutally subjugated. As is the right of any American to stand to tyranny, in any form.

Right after the the ones that have enacted this against the good people of New York.

This is straight abhorrent.

This is a death knell against the 1st and the 4th.

Might as well show up with the IRS and ATF, bc this type of thing ain’t slippery, it IS the slope.

No wonder Mayor Adam’s as disgraceful as he is was given the toss under the proverbial bus.

Happy Thanksgiving to you all ATS.

Take care of you and yours.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: Kenzo

So anyone considered an enemy of the state can disappear under the quarantine law. Don't they realize that includes the governor and everyone else involved in the charade as well?

Looks at Mayor Adams recent diatribe and subsequent fray with the FBI.

Side eyes this comment.

a reply to: Kenzo

Thanks for the reminder of that film!

Cheers

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Here`s the updated cover

By now everyone knows this no about covid anymore, this is about abuse of power and the darn court is all complicit.

I am glad I do not even contemplate going to that democrat hell hole anymore.

The filth in the streets is over whelming, I have friends that went over to visit NY and right outside their hotel is homeless waiting for the tourist to exit the hotel to demand money, I mean he told me that they were literally in his face demanding money, they do not want food, or hand out they want darn money, and they want it now.

Beside that is plenty of places to eat good.

Once you dodge the homeless.

Nazis in charge.
Our Country has gone to Hell under Democrat Control.
a reply to: Kenzo

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Here`s the updated cover

You know, considering that the sequel was "Escape from L.A.", maybe these films were predictive programming or at the very least projections based on liberal agendas that have been in effect since these stories were written. Like "Idiocracy", exaggerated to the extreme but now looking back pretty much on target.

As a New Yorker I can tell you the problems lie with NYC and Albany, not with most of the state. Hochul and Cuomo have both been terrible for us. One party rule has thrashed all sorts of norms here. Democrats are also trying to force a gerrymandering on us to by the courts. All of the disfunction you could imagine originates with the stranglehold the left holds in the major power centers of NY. But no call out about the obvious deterioration they have presided over.

a reply to: Kenzo

Quick, call in Plisken!

This is old news when corona virus came out. Cuomo was given the authority to detain anyone he deemed a health risk.

Has there been updates?

a reply to: Kenzo

Lived in Connecticut after I got out of the military over a decade ago.

THAT was too close for New York for me.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Kenzo

Quick, call in Plisken!

...always thought it was Blisken !