Hillary Clinton for President in 2024

a reply to: RogerFalcon

I agree that we are marching off to world war, for many reasons.

a reply to: PorkChop96

Wish I could give you more stars! Very comprehensive list. Thank you.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
a reply to: Annee

adjective
Morally bad or wrong; wicked.
"an evil tyrant."
Causing ruin, injury, or pain; harmful.
"the evil effects of a poor diet."
Characterized by or indicating future misfortune; ominous.
"evil omens."

I didn't see God mentioned anywhere in this definition.

She has caused ruin and injury.

Ask the little girl who's back was broken by the convulsions she experienced before the fire burned her alive.

Ask the 12 year old girl who was accused by her brutal rapists defense lawyer, Hillary, that she wanted it.

Ask the families of the Benghazi heroes, that didn't matter to her in the least that died, and her continuing lies about a video causing it. On 9/11 no less.

None of those were religious acts, but all brought grevious harm to innocents. So yes, in a non-religious way, see above, Hillary is EVIL.

I’ve actually read the facts on Benghazi.

Have you?

And I don’t mean from a Right Wing rag.

I do not want to let this part go.
There is not another topic that involves Hilary that represents her complete lack of ethical ability to govern.

Please Annee, elaborate all you can on Hilary and Benghazi.
I personally seek retribution for the murder of Seal team 6.
Where did the stinger missile that took down their helicopter come from?
Why were so many Seal Team 6 on board that helicopter at the same time, circumventing protocols of that ever supposed to happen?

Was what happened at Benghazi a buyback of the rest of those American made and sold stinger missiles?

Because I am addressing high treason with these conclusions and Biden, Hilary and Obama are in bed together on this very serious Benghazi issue.

Or do you believe as Hilary does, "what difference does it make"?

No.

If the CIA is this desperate, we are totally fooked.

William Hill have her at 200 - 1. I'm quite keen on long odd bets but even I wouldn't take that one.

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: quintessentone

The RNC and DNC made a pact after Ross Perots rise in the 1990's to block all Independents. Since they control the press it was done

Yep, Perot actually got 20% of the vote, scared the beejeezus out of all of those sick bastards.

originally posted by: TheWhat
William Hill have her at 200 - 1. I'm quite keen on long odd bets but even I wouldn't take that one.

You might rethink that statement after you remember they have the ability to get 550million votes counted because they only voted to not elect Trump because of States legislatures regulating abortion and its Trumps fault.

With 550million votes for her she will be the most popular president evah.
And the 1st woman president too.
It will be historic.
Hillary always thought of herself as an underdog.
Me too, well not under maybe.
And her horse faced puppy as the only survivor from her litter.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation
If she is actually in the running next year and the odds remain static or get longer I might risk small flutter

a reply to: Waterglass
We do not need an other milquetoast running against the Bully. I did not like her in 16 because she was the figurehead of the establishment, the face put before us to put a smile on the face of the beast.

However also in 16 the revolutionaries revolted and voted against that machine, a machine that is decades, no, centuries old. Unfortunately their battle was merely pyrrhic and the revolutionary army was left with no leader other than a moronic imbecile who can see no further than his mirror.

I did not want Clinton. I DO not want Clinton but it looks as if our wants are out the door. If it has gotten to the point that we ''need'' Clinton then so be it.

We should also look beyond Perot to 2000. Nader ran on the Green ticket and both of the major parties would not even allow him on the stage as they had Perot. He too was way to scary for them.....

a reply to: Annee

A resume that says you are a war criminal and a corporate agent is quite worthless.

The single good thing from her life was championing universal health care back in the 90s. But that didn't work out so well.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I did not want Clinton. I DO not want Clinton but it looks as if our wants are out the door. If it has gotten to the point that we ''need'' Clinton then so be it.

Neither do I but IMO its once again wete back to the lessor of two evils. She seems to have the stones to crush, kill and destroy thise who wnat to destroy the USA. That includes Klaus over at the WEF.

a reply to: Waterglass

She is weak, and not well respected.
Biden isn't going to bow out for her, and
neither will Harris, she has her eyes set
on the prize like a baggie of coke, Plus she
is the apple of Obama's hetro side eye.

a reply to: Waterglass


Bingo.

a reply to: burntheships

What are you talking about?
Hillary would make a courageous leader!

Remember that one time she arrived in Bosnia “under sniper fire.”

When the going gets tough, the mob dials Hillary!

a reply to: Waterglass

Her party, from which she would derive her power (as President), is packed to the brim with WEF stooges and she is a committed neoliberal globalist herself. The very ideology promoted by the WEF worldwide.

How exactly is she going to "destroy" Klaus and the WEF?

a reply to: imitator

And that time at Benghazi where we left our own high and dry
so she could promote a video covering up her emails that
were compromised.

Seth Rich.

DNC leaked emails.

Russia Russia Russia.

a reply to: burntheships

That's why we need Hillary as president... snitches get stitches.

She's perfect for DC.

a reply to: Annee

How many have actually read her résumé ?


I have......33,000 deleted emails under supeona, classified information on an unclassified server at her residence, destroying phones etc.


NO THANKS

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I did not want Clinton. I DO not want Clinton but it looks as if our wants are out the door. If it has gotten to the point that we ''need'' Clinton then so be it.

Neither do I but IMO its once again wete back to the lessor of two evils. She seems to have the stones to crush, kill and destroy thise who wnat to destroy the USA. That includes Klaus over at the WEF.

You can't be serious. Her goal in 2016 was to hand over the U.S. to the WEF - that hasn't changed and its only become more urgent for her and the swamp.