It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Flinx
Great answer Seekerof. If that was in response to my post. Maybe it was because you guys were just...what's the word....OWNED?
Originally posted by Flinx
I said you must be owned because I've never gotten an real response (as if one would even be possible) from a Bu#e (so much for non-inflammatory terms) to my question. By that I mean why do you guys cite Saddam's "evilness" as a motive for war when you know very well that it was not. Also why do you pretend that you care about the Iraqi people?
As to Saddam being owned, yeah strongest military in the world vs some poorly armed, poorly paid Iraqis. Bruce Lee vs a toddler. Ooooo.....big victory. Get back to me when ya beat a real enemy.
Wouldn't matter anyhoo...those concrete filled shoes you wearing will keep you anchored in your already formed ideas and opinions...eh?!
Originally posted by abeyer
Unless the Dems can't come up with a viable candidate, I don't see how Bush could get re-elected. Osama and Saddam are still on the run, the economy is still low, the country has a record deficit and high unemployment. Plus as more people become informed the admin's support of the Patriot Act could become a negative as well, and if the "Road Map" steers off course he's screwed. As bad as the Dems are looking for the next election 2004 could be the year of the 3rd Party candidate.
Originally posted by Flinx
Wouldn't matter anyhoo...those concrete filled shoes you wearing will keep you anchored in your already formed ideas and opinions...eh?!
Yeah like you. Heh.
Already formed ideas and opinions... What does that men? Who doesn't have ideas and opinions? Are you saying you don't? I don't see how that's possible.
But all of this has nothing to do with my question which you've managed to muddle with attempts to analyze my personality or whatever you're doing. You must be an old hand at this. I salute you.
Originally posted by Flinx
Oh blarrg....
Right. I have nothing better to do that shuffle through pages and pages of crap from months ago. I just post here during the lulls at my job (of which there are alot recently). With all the time you've spent trying to "re-own" me you could have typed a couple of sentences detailing your view. But I'm tired of reading your drivel and I don't really care anymore. So you win!
Came to this board to read about UFOs, conspiracies, and the paranormal not argue with sheeple, I mean people about politics. Bye.
Originally posted by Flinx
Why do you guys keep taking about how many people Saddam killed as if that justified the war in Iraq. He gassed his own people, he had executions of the innocent, etc. So did dozens of other dictators in the world. They've done and are doing worse and the hawks and the so-called media aren't saying a word about them.
Why aren't we invading these countries too? Why aren't we liberating countries in Africa where dictators are killing millions RIGHT NOW? Why aren't we liberating Burma? Why aren't we liberating North Korea where the population doesn't have power or running water?
Is it perhaps because they aren't easy pushovers like the Iraqis? Is it because it won't be a quick and easy victory to push up the president's approval ratings and drum up mindless patriotism? Maybe there's no side benefits like...oh....oil?
Anyway, point is. You pro-administration guys (as non-inflammatory of a term as I can think of) can quit talking about how bad Saddam was to his people and how he gassed, tortured, and imprisoned them. He's a pussycat compared to other dictators. You know quite well that had nothing to do with the reasons for this war. And you know damn well you couldn't care less about the Iraqi people.