The Untold Story of Malaysian Flight MH370

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: Lazy88

Is there something that makes any of that impossible?

“Possible” in the context of you can’t prove any means of the video being recorded by something?

a reply to: Lazy88

If something is known to be impossible then we know it cannot have happened.

We don't know if it's impossible for UFO’s (whatever they may be) to abduct the jet out of existence / time / demotion with no cause or warning.
We don't know if it's impossible for them to cloak their activity.
We don't know their intentions, so we don't know if they let aircraft in the area record the event without being jammed or taken too.
We don't know if it was possible for the plane to call in the incident before the jet was abducted.

As we don't have any evidence of all the above being impossible, then it means they are possible, even if not likely.

If they are possible then we should accept those as possibilities, even if we do not like them.

Personally, I think this was either hoaxed on purpose or someone reused some existing CGI video and presented it as being from MH370.

But, as I don't take my opinion as the absolute truth, I must accept other possibilities, and that's what I am doing.

a reply to: ArMaP

Sigh.

Referring to the capture of video and the video is obviously fake.

This..



If it wasn’t satellite, then what captured the video.

a reply to: Lazy88

As I said here, I don't know what kind of equipment could have taken that kind of images or even if they exist.

Could be another plane, a drone, a balloon? I don't know.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: Lazy88

As I said here, I don't know what kind of equipment could have taken that kind of images or even if they exist.

Could be another plane, a drone, a balloon? I don't know.

And there is no induction that the video came from such a source, unless you can present it.

Possible is not actual physical evidence. A ten year old child could have filmed it riding a chair with balloons and an oxygen mask?

a reply to: Lazy88
If things are not impossible then they are possible.

And it's true that "possible" is not physical evidence, but it's also true that lack of evidence doesn't mean something is false.
Can you show us physical evidence that it's impossible for the videos to have been taken by a plane, a drone or a balloon?
I will have no problem in accepting that physical evidence.

a reply to: ArMaP


The color video is claimed to be from satellite because it’s highly unlikely with no evidence there was anything in the area to film it. If it was civilian or in most cases military it would have a transponder. Unless stealth, it wound be on radar. A ballon over the ocean that happen to be in the flight path of 370? With video ability to film the jet? Why would a military assets film 370? And not through the heads up display? Civilians aircraft would have a transponder broadcasting. And most likely would film through a window.

Any record of aircraft in the area would be included in the flight 370 investigation.

But it’s worse than that. From the way pixels stack, the crappy resolution, the use of static backgrounds, and stock footage. The videos are a hoax.




Anyway. The “explosion” for this video is also found to be from stock footage.

a reply to: ArMaP

We don't know if it's impossible for UFO’s (whatever they may be) to abduct the jet out of existence / time / demotion with no cause or warning. We don't know if it's impossible for them to cloak their activity.

Please how can you define an unknown. How would you know what is possible and impossible to advanced crafts and beings...

a reply to: Lazy88

Do you have physical evidences that those possibilities are impossible?

a reply to: purplemer

Exactly. We cannot know.

But just because we cannot know it doesn't mean it's impossible.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: purplemer

Exactly. We cannot know.

But just because we cannot know it doesn't mean it's impossible.

Which has nothing to do with the videos being proven beyond reasonable and rationale doubt of being fakes.

originally posted by: Lazy88
Which has nothing to do with the videos being proven beyond reasonable and rationale doubt of being fakes.

What is reasonable to one person may not be to others, a reasonable and rational doubt is not something that can be measured.

That's why I prefer physical evidences, people's perception are too variable.

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: Lazy88
Which has nothing to do with the videos being proven beyond reasonable and rationale doubt of being fakes.

What is reasonable to one person may not be to others, a reasonable and rational doubt is not something that can be measured.

That's why I prefer physical evidences, people's perception are too variable.

As in both videos used stock footage for the explosion/energy release frames.

a reply to: Lazy88

Both videos? I only saw that regarding the one that appears to be from a thermal camera.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: Lazy88

Both videos? I only saw that regarding the one that appears to be from a thermal camera.

This post…

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: ArMaP


The color video is claimed to be from satellite because it’s highly unlikely with no evidence there was anything in the area to film it. If it was civilian or in most cases military it would have a transponder. Unless stealth, it wound be on radar. A ballon over the ocean that happen to be in the flight path of 370? With video ability to film the jet? Why would a military assets film 370? And not through the heads up display? Civilians aircraft would have a transponder broadcasting. And most likely would film through a window.

Any record of aircraft in the area would be included in the flight 370 investigation.

But it’s worse than that. From the way pixels stack, the crappy resolution, the use of static backgrounds, and stock footage. The videos are a hoax.

Anyway. The “explosion” for this video is also found to be from stock footage.

Time stamp at 1:18 of the Mick West video, Debunks of the Aliens Abducting a Plane


I guess the original was found by redditor Happygrammy.

a reply to: Lazy88

Thanks for that.

But that doesn't look as similar as the one on the other video, as there are some parts that do not match.

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: Lazy88

Both videos? I only saw that regarding the one that appears to be from a thermal camera.

This post…

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: ArMaP


The color video is claimed to be from satellite because it’s highly unlikely with no evidence there was anything in the area to film it. If it was civilian or in most cases military it would have a transponder. Unless stealth, it wound be on radar. A ballon over the ocean that happen to be in the flight path of 370? With video ability to film the jet? Why would a military assets film 370? And not through the heads up display? Civilians aircraft would have a transponder broadcasting. And most likely would film through a window.

Any record of aircraft in the area would be included in the flight 370 investigation.

But it’s worse than that. From the way pixels stack, the crappy resolution, the use of static backgrounds, and stock footage. The videos are a hoax.

Anyway. The “explosion” for this video is also found to be from stock footage.

Time stamp at 1:18 of the Mick West video, Debunks of the Aliens Abducting a Plane


I guess the original was found by redditor Happygrammy.

That looks nothing like it, he only ever compares a single frame, and Mick West is a known shill. "Fact checkers" are part of the censorship industrial complex.

We need always to apply critical thinking and Occam's razor. Having done so, do you think this really makes sense? In my opinion it's a hoax. I'm surprised that so many armchair warriors fall for this stuff.

interesting stuff here: www.skywatchtv.com...



Alice in Wonderland rings ... portal for Mirror Universe ... so 3 'orbs' are home grown technology

which are most likely back-engineered from alien devices (left on purpose like Afghanistan 85 Billion weapons arsenal gift from USA)

? Disclosure ? blame disappearance on Alien Entities?


food for thought in any case ...

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: Lazy88

Thanks for that.

But that doesn't look as similar as the one on the other video, as there are some parts that do not match.

It was ran through a filter and driven into over exposer something like this.

Took a whole minute on my phone.