Defendant Trump Will Reveal Classified Info That Demonstrates One Way Democrats Cheat.

originally posted by: RazorV66
The goddamn difference is Trump wasn’t destroying the country like Biden and his goons.
If you can’t see that, then it’s on you.

We are currently living in the America that Trump created. You just have your nose too far up his ass to see it.

originally posted by: Euronymous2625

originally posted by: RazorV66
The goddamn difference is Trump wasn’t destroying the country like Biden and his goons.
If you can’t see that, then it’s on you.

We are currently living in the America that Trump created. You just have your nose too far up his ass to see it.

We are living in a time of hate that the Liberals created.
You are just too delusional to see it.

a reply to: RazorV66

Cry me a river bro.
You do that oh so well

a reply to: 31331Dos

Don't forget the record levels of spending while cutting taxes for the wealthy. And that was before the pandemic.

originally posted by: RazorV66
We are living in a time of hate that the Liberals created.
You are just too delusional to see it.

Both sides are to blame for how divided we now are, but he was the man in the middle of it.

As far as the economy is concerned, it was like giving a spoiled, mentally challenged child a credit card with no limit. Now we're paying the bill. Debts have to be paid, and he racked up 8.2 trillion in 4 years! That's just under what Obama racked up in 8 years!

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: 31331Dos
He didn't do anything but give the illusion of change.

Exactly!

So many still believing his mouth -- with no interest in real facts.

This is hilarious. It is so idiotic for a Trump supporter to post memes like because the meme usually describes them to a T. LMAO

originally posted by: FactorFake2
This is hilarious. It is so idiotic for a Trump supporter to post memes like because the meme usually describes them to a T. LMAO

The phrase "critical thinking" lost its meaning during Trump's presidency lol. But, yeah. That whole meme describes Trumpers to a T.

From cares source.

Trump's New Trial Plan Gets His Supporters Excited

"This is ridiculous. ... The stuff that was rejected was this nonsense about [Venezuelan President] Hugo Chavez and satellites taking up information," Nick Akerman, former assistant special Watergate prosecutor and former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, told Newsweek via phone. "This is all Sidney Powell stuff."

Powell recently pleaded guilty in the Georgia election tampering case. She made numerous unsubstantiated claims following the 2020 election, falsely alleging that proof of voting irregularities was located in a server in Germany.

She also claimed that voting software used by Georgia and other states was created at the direction of Chavez, who died in 2013. Powell also repeated the debunked claim that votes for Trump had probably been switched in favor of Biden.

Akerman surmises that the new filing on Trump's behalf is based on Powell's previous statements, along with claims by others in Trump's orbit, that foreign entities interfered with the accuracy of U.S. voting machines.

It's all part of a larger attempt to muddy the legal waters, he added.

"[Trump's] problem, of course, is that Powell is now cooperating and is a government witness," he said. "So, he's screwed and there's no way around that. She will blow that argument up."

Also

Some pointed out the irony perhaps of Trump attorneys offering classified documents related to one indictment while a complete other case involving the former president accuses him of unlawfully keeping classified materials in his home.

"So while under investigation for retaining and sharing classified documents in one case, in another he is going to reveal classified documents that he says we don't know about?"

a reply to: Euronymous2625

That user seems to be really into a book from Matt Furie.
Their own disdainful view of people will be the end in a very much bot cool way.
I can almost taste the salty tears atm.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: RazorV66

People voted against Trump because of their hurt, fragile feelz.
Trump is an asshole but he wasn’t actively destroying the country.

Here we go with the feelz again. Oh, wait -- fragile feelz.

I'm so totally a sensitive, emotional, person I think I need to cry (s/)

My brain says I'm right. How can YOU argue that?

a reply to: network dude

Your brain is filled with anger.
Some could argue rightfully so and others would say no.
Where will you stand when push come to shove?
You seem like a good person. Will you be in the end?
Only you can answer that.

So when he was President he could have legally presented this info. Instead he had lawyers do a whole fake elector scheme. Has his minions lie and slander 2 poll workers. Then waits until it's illegal for him to have classified info. Still waits until he's charged with a crime, then waits another year, then files 20 different objections and motions, then waits, then says no wait I really do have proof? 🤣🤣

So, if he wasn't charged with a crime, he just never would have ever presented his "evidence". This makes sense to people?
He lets his attorneys take plea deals for his schemes, ruining their career and lives, rather than legally present this info almost 4 years ago? Wow. The man who can't keep his mouth shut. The man who claimed he had "proof", but never in 60 court cases provided it?

a reply to: frogs453

Honestly pointing out the faulty actions taken fall on deaf ears.
Unfortunately in today's world we only given literally 2 options.
You chose yours and they one. It may suck but it is what it is

originally posted by: frogs453
So when he was President he could have legally presented this info. Instead he had lawyers do a whole fake elector scheme. Has his minions lie and slander 2 poll workers. Then waits until it's illegal for him to have classified info. Still waits until he's charged with a crime, then waits another year, then files 20 different objections and motions, then waits, then says no wait I really do have proof? 🤣🤣

So, if he wasn't charged with a crime, he just never would have ever presented his "evidence". This makes sense to people?
He lets his attorneys take plea deals for his schemes, ruining their career and lives, rather than legally present this info almost 4 years ago? Wow. The man who can't keep his mouth shut. The man who claimed he had "proof", but never in 60 court cases provided it?

He just needs your donation to follow through, and MAGA!

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: 777Vader

I got a " Feeling " those Votes in the Box were Not for Mr. Trump..............Hmm....

IF only you had proof.

Yeah , and if Only You could Authenticate them All being Legal Ballots . There is the " Rub " .

There's no rub.

Not a single accusation of voter fraud held up in court. (except against Republicans I recollect).

And do not come back with "they wouldn't look at the proof" -- that is just a lame excuse to back up ZIP.

Standing.
60 cases where the courts dismissed the case because he had no standing.
60 of 63 cases.
He won 2/3 of the cases the court looked at.
Now that he is being prosecuted for the fraud that tries to blame him.
Now he has standing.
Now all those cases are relevant because Trump can show he was harmed and does have standing.
And this is how you enter evidence into the courts.
The good news is.
You can still ignore the facts.
Close your eyes, stop up your ears.
Change the channel.
And deny, deny, deny.

Didn't Bidens DOJ indict smartmatic 3 or 4 weeks ago for fraud in interfering with the Philipines elections?
I thought that was interesting.
Timing wise.
If you are lucky something big in the news cycle could distract everyone.
Like the big Iran spy ring in DC getting exposed.
I think I read where the Trump administration was involved with Iran infiltrating our government and spying.
The Awan Brothers or something.
Trump is in trouble for foreign spying with the Iranians.
That is a good news cycle to distract us away from this election fraud stupidity, right?
I mean, what does it matter anymore?
It is not like anyone was harmed, amirite?
Trump may be in a lot of trouble for January 6 and attempting to interfere with the election.
But, now he has standing for those 60 cases the courts would not accept and look at.

And now that evidence is admissible into the court system because Trump does now, have standing,well.
What difference does it make?
That's old stuff

a reply to: frogs453

Kicking the can down the road is Trump's specialty. He's got his hooks so far into some people that he could kick it off a bridge and they'd gladly jump off chasing after it.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: RazorV66

People voted against Trump because of their hurt, fragile feelz.
Trump is an asshole but he wasn’t actively destroying the country.

Here we go with the feelz again. Oh, wait -- fragile feelz.

I'm so totally a sensitive, emotional, person I think I need to cry (s/)

My brain says I'm right. How can YOU argue that?

Dude.
You are your brain

originally posted by: frogs453
So when he was President he could have legally presented this info. Instead he had lawyers do a whole fake elector scheme. Has his minions lie and slander 2 poll workers. Then waits until it's illegal for him to have classified info. Still waits until he's charged with a crime, then waits another year, then files 20 different objections and motions, then waits, then says no wait I really do have proof? 🤣🤣

So, if he wasn't charged with a crime, he just never would have ever presented his "evidence". This makes sense to people?
He lets his attorneys take plea deals for his schemes, ruining their career and lives, rather than legally present this info almost 4 years ago? Wow. The man who can't keep his mouth shut. The man who claimed he had "proof", but never in 60 court cases provided it?

Kind of a strange predicament for you.
The courts rejected 60 of 63 cases.
He won 2/3.
60 cases not accepted because he had no standing.

Now that he is prosecuted for Jan 6.
He has standing.
What a dilemma for this claim you are making.
What the courts would not even look at, because of a lack of standing, is now evidence and about to be entered into the system.
And once that happens other cases can use that evidence for those cases.
But.

What difference does it make?

originally posted by: Dandandat3
How is election interference on the part of Joe Biden and/or foreign actors relivent in a trile to determine if Trump is guilty of election interference?

Democrats actually pulled it off.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

So, it was some master plan? I mean he posted classified photos on Twitter while in office, yet he was silent about this?

He schemed a fraudulent plan while in office, but was silent on this?

He's ruined lives of those close to him, who are now considered criminals and lost their careers, and still was silent?

He let his ultra supporters spend time in prison and again ruin their lives and was still silent about this? Fathers and mothers separated for years from their children because mentioning it earlier had no benefit to him?

What's ruining a few thousand lives, when he can just wait to tell anyone about this "proof" until it benefits him in a criminal case? What a great leader!