Yall want answers huh.....

Here's yet another longtime member of the site who found it curious that he could no longer post threads, logged out to log back in & perhaps fix it, only to find that the username & password no longer worked, and he had to set up this new account just to get back in again - only to find that he still can't post threads *though maybe I have to do 20 posts before they'll let me, who knows at this point. Hopefully this will all make sense again soon, and we can have our forum back. Because members make a forum, not the owners. And I have threads to post gosh darn it!

a reply to: TimeOfTrouble1771

Keep posting, you'll get there.

originally posted by: Coelacanth55
so if we start a new account with same email we won't get busted for multiple accounts?

I don’t think so.

I had to create one after last year’s incident.

Just stick with the new one and if things get corrected PM a Mod to see if they can help retrieve your original one.

Special circumstances.

Also to add, making a new account so you can log on is the least of the TOS violations occurring at the moment.

a reply to: NorthOS

Moderators have been banned for less.

Or for nothing, to be clear.

originally posted by: quintessentone2

originally posted by: JoesAPuppet
a reply to: quintessentone2

you know the Darkos floated the idea of a pay site before the purge.
not sure i'd give them a dollar

I don't think they have the traffic for a pay site, advertising would be the way to go. Unless they lost their advertisers what with all the discriminatory threads.

Great job scooping that name back up so we knew it was you.

Speaking of narratives.

Remember that time you didn't know that difference between the name of a pathogen and the name of the disease it causes and were trying to tell other members that SARS-COV-2 hybridized with COVID? Remember, all that was because you were very upset that the heavily funded pharma narrative was being criticized and debunked?

Remember, then you just denied it and wouldn't own up to the error?

That was awesome.

a reply to: ksihkahe

You mean this person can't acknowledge when they make mistakes?


How....odd.....

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: NorthOS

Moderators have been banned for less.

Or for nothing, to be clear.

I was a moderator on another site years ago. I had to have two accounts to check on some of the problems reported on that site. If someone complains about something that doesn't show up when logged in as a moderator, how else are you supposed to check it and report it as a technical issue? Some information is presented differently between moderators and users.

Mainly posted that to get my posts up. I think this is five.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Okay, so the unfairly banned moderator is BZ in this version. (Personal note, Non-sequitur comment for almost everybody)

Good moderator, totally sold me on the bull# that is catalytic converters. Rarely saw eye to eye, but that didn't matter. Sucks a falling out occurred. That's a loss. I assume the other one was the liberal pissing everyone off.

Although I've also heard the owner allowed and wanted this to happen to say "F* You", so there's some conflicting narratives already. Sigh.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

You forgot the part where Darko set up some fake seemingly insulting advertisement on the forum before disappearing.

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

Feel free to use this thread for upping your post count.

I just want folks to know that perhaps this all could have been averted if there was pressure on the actual owners, or perceived owners to do something for the site and especially to aid the moderators.

Instead, some got banned and talking about it got censored.

originally posted by: ksihkahe

originally posted by: quintessentone2

originally posted by: JoesAPuppet
a reply to: quintessentone2

you know the Darkos floated the idea of a pay site before the purge.
not sure i'd give them a dollar

I don't think they have the traffic for a pay site, advertising would be the way to go. Unless they lost their advertisers what with all the discriminatory threads.

Great job scooping that name back up so we knew it was you.

Speaking of narratives.

Remember that time you didn't know that difference between the name of a pathogen and the name of the disease it causes and were trying to tell other members that SARS-COV-2 hybridized with COVID? Remember, all that was because you were very upset that the heavily funded pharma narrative was being criticized and debunked?

Remember, then you just denied it and wouldn't own up to the error?

That was awesome.

I still stand by my interpretation and if you can't accept others' stances then the problem does not lie with me.

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: ksihkahe

You mean this person can't acknowledge when they make mistakes?


How....odd.....

Like you just did in the other thread?

a reply to: SheWasTheDarkness

Two moderators who not only did a good job moderating but also brought fair, concise, spirited threads and debate.
Another who wanted some accountability.

originally posted by: quintessentone2

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: ksihkahe

You mean this person can't acknowledge when they make mistakes?


How....odd.....

Like you just did in the other thread?

Something like that.....


Close....


You gonna dance for me here too my little pet?

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: quintessentone2

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: ksihkahe

You mean this person can't acknowledge when they make mistakes?


How....odd.....

Like you just did in the other thread?

Something like that.....


Close....


You gonna dance for me here too my little pet?

That my little doggie poo is only for special people.

a reply to: quintessentone2

I know I'm special, your approval isn't required.


Now watch me pull some more strings....

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: quintessentone2

I know I'm special, your approval isn't required.


Now watch me pull some more strings....

I know you are not special and my approval is not given.

a reply to: quintessentone2

Yet you keep responding to me...

Odd that, no?

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: quintessentone2

Yet you keep responding to me...

Odd that, no?

You started it with your need for one upmanship and continual azzhatting.

a reply to: quintessentone2

I thought it started with your inability to articulate a term within a specified context.......


And it continues with your inability to admit it..