It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: EternalShadow
Yes, and Jim Jordan is for more Ukraine funding and yet, fiscally prudent Matt Gaetz, who's position on the matter was in direct opposition to more funding, endorsed Jim Jordan to pickup where Kevin left off. After all that drama...(w.t.f.)
JIM JORDAN: I'm obviously for helping Ukraine, we’ve done that. I’m not for this spending an additional $14 billion or whatever he’s [Biden] proposing now. I opposed the last $40 or $50 billion that the Biden Administration wanted, but yes, we should always be talking to see if there’s a way we can work this out. But remember, I think we can never forget Russia is the aggression here and has been, and we’ve been supporting Ukraine as we should.
September of 2022....
I mean if you're going to have an opinion, don't you want the facts first?
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Klassified
Isn't it time the Republicans get their head out of their nether regions and elect a house speaker? He doesn't have to be perfect, just a real republican instead of the a rino, like the ones holding up this vote. As you can see, Jeffries got more votes the first round. Seriously? SMFH!
why not just blow it all up. have about 10 R's vote for Jeffries, and let the idiots know what the consequences are for being a dickface.
That's just more #storm. I'd rather they both compromise and find someone who is moderate but tough, and can lead both sides. The way a leader should.
There are 221 Republicans in the House, and I can name about 30-40 of them, maybe. And none of those can apparently win the seat.
Now they need to focus on someone out of the other 180, someone less known, more centrist and capable of leading both sides. Not someone famous and after social media clicks; we need a work-horse, not a show-horse.
"Three-quarters of Americans say members of Congress should be willing to compromise and prioritize bipartisan legislation over standing with their party, including 84% of Democrats and 71% of Republicans."
www.newsnationnow.com...
Unlike a lot of idiots here on ATS, most Americans want the government to work in a bipartisan way.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: EternalShadow
Well, if you have something to the contrary..
By all means, show your work...