It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: margo6044
There has to be a temporal link for this to be recognized, if it is noticed that six months after the jab people are getting clots, then you can only say that the risk of clotting in six months has increased in the general population by two times. So is a year out going to be four times and so on.?
originally posted by: margo6044
a reply to: quintessentone2
I got covid in August, tested positive, I have not problems at all, my daughter a nurse had to take the jab when it was mandatory by hospitals in Florida, she got covid twice after, she just got a series of test due to arrythmia.
Thankfully all came back great and not heart problems, the arrythmia is better, but she can tell when her heart skips a beat.
My son in the other hand, after taking the jab, a few months later, he got soo dizzy that he fell on the floor at work, was send to the emergency room where a EKG show anomalies to his heart rhythm, he then visited a cardiologist, now he is in blood pressure pills, never had a health problem in his life and he is a young man, fit and eat well.
He has never gotten covid.
originally posted by: margo6044
a reply to: quintessentone2
Too early for studies, no the long term ones, is very well known that years after a medication of vaccine is introduced studies starts to pile up, even after a generation, the side effects of new vaccines or medications can take up to 5 years for the side effects to appear and up to a generation to know the real effects in the body and offspring's.
originally posted by: margo6044
a reply to: quintessentone2
If you used me and my immediate family as examples, the only problems is arrythmia not blood clots, now my husband have a nasty cough since the jab and still can not get rid of it.