It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On October 4, the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry will check the public warning system in all regions. This is stated in a message on the department’s website.
“A large-scale audit of public warning systems at the regional and municipal levels will take place in all regions of Russia. The warning system is designed to timely convey a signal to the population in the event of a threat or emergency of a natural or man-made nature,” the Ministry of Emergency Situations indicated.
They reported that during the check, sirens and loudspeakers with the signal “Attention everyone!” will sound on the streets, and a message with safety information will appear on TV channels and on the radio. “Hearing the sound of a siren, you must remain calm and not panic, turn on the TV (any public channel) or radio and listen to the information message,” the Ministry of Emergency Situations noted.
Checking the operation of the warning system and the readiness of the personnel on duty is necessary to “be confident in the performance of all existing systems for the timely delivery of signals and information to the population in the event of emergency situations,” the ministry explained.
originally posted by: MCurns
a reply to: putnam6
Imagine my sudden stop in my tracks when the a news bulletin came in last night about an explosion and fire last night was reported and them explaining that they didn't know what it was but would update as soon as they knew......
originally posted by: Crackalackin
Ok now it's getting weird because I thought they were doing it on the 3rd. Or would it be the third in that time zone?
originally posted by: putnam6
Since it is doubtful both countries are coincidentally testing emergency alert systems on the same day. Isn't this more likely a form of diplomatic sparring? Or are there other reasons...
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: putnam6
Maybe they're just ramping up the fear factor?
Probably,
but do you mean Russia or the US? or both
and what are the motivations...
originally posted by: face23785
My biggest concern is what the hell is a "nuclear-powered cruise missile"?
The concept of a nuclear-powered cruise missile is not new. The United States labored to field a similar technology in a nuclear-powered ramjet codenamed “Project Pluto”, in the years when ballistic missile technology was still nascent and its effective fielding uncertain. Yet, with the rise of the ballistic missile, the need to field a nuclear-powered cruise missile in the form of the Super Sonic Low Altitude Missile (SLAM) disappeared. This seemed to have been a good thing, because between the size, sound, and radioactivity produced by the low flying nuclear ramjet engine, the SLAM was a dirty, cruise missile irradiating, at speeds above Mach 3, whatever land it didn’t vaporize with its payload.
If it is true that Russia has not only developed a nuclear-powered cruise missile, but supposedly made it small enough to fit on the equivalent of US Tomahawk or Russian air launched X-101, it represents an impressive engineering breakthrough. The US SLAM was over 28 meters long, while a US Tomahawk is 5.56 meters long (or 6.25 meters with its booster).
Maybe, the thought that no other country would develop it is a part of the nuclear powered cruise missile’s asymmetric deterrence impact. Unlike in the field of HGVs and HCMs, Russia will likely be the only country fielding a nuclear powered cruise missile for some time to come, maybe indefinitely. As some commentators have observed, “it’s just crazy” that the missile has been field-tested, much less will be deployed. But perhaps that’s the point. To the Russians, being the only country to field this capability serves as a sort of nuclear weapons PR “win” while simultaneously striking fear in those who believe the fielding of the system to be unnecessary or reckless.
Weaknesses in Conventional Power Projection
Another aspect of Russia’s strategic position highlighted by fielding a nuclear-powered cruise missile is its fear of NATO and U.S. power projection. Russian power projection is affected by both its technological issues and dearth of real allies.
originally posted by: nugget1
...
I don't think Russia and/or BRICS are working with the US, but one never knows.
Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11 and WOMD leave me looking for clues.
originally posted by: nugget1
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: putnam6
Maybe they're just ramping up the fear factor?
Probably,
but do you mean Russia or the US? or both
and what are the motivations...
I mean it's all part of the plan to destabilize the world order or we're truly on the cusp of a major war.
I don't think Russia and/or BRICS are working with the US, but one never knows.
Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11 and WOMD leave me looking for clues.
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: nugget1
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: putnam6
Maybe they're just ramping up the fear factor?
Probably,
but do you mean Russia or the US? or both
and what are the motivations...
I mean it's all part of the plan to destabilize the world order or we're truly on the cusp of a major war.
I don't think Russia and/or BRICS are working with the US, but one never knows.
Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11 and WOMD leave me looking for clues.
Most definitely Im looking for clues too, considering a couple of incidents that went down, around the US testing like 9/11 if nothing else it signals somebody somewhere thinks we need to test this stuff because we may be close to a TSHTF scenario.
Spidey senses are tingling, guess that happens when it becomes difficult to trust the Government, the DoD, etc.