Russell Brand being investigated by Thames Valley Police following harassment and stalking claims

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Muldar

Used to be. Gone all alt right while ago.

So you say he isn't left-wing?!
That's not believable...

He is left but he isn't woke!

I want to see how many other women will come forward and be with what kind of allegations. It looks like there could be many more!

not sure how you define 'woke' but he is a vegan, wishes he was bisexual, supports socialsim etc, does any of that make him 'woke', Ive never understood what the definition is, perhaps you could give me your defintion of woke?

Is Russell Brand Embracing Veganism Once Again? A Glimpse Into His Vegan Journey

Russell Brand: 'I wish I were bisexual - I'm tedious with my heterosexuality'

Russell Brand’s socialist revolution

Russell Brand Calls For Left-Wing Revolution

Russell Brand says he had gay sex in a toilet as it was filmed for a TV documentary series exploring social taboos

a reply to: shooterbrody

Plod arrested her, not the Government?

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Muldar

Used to be. Gone all alt right while ago.

So you say he isn't left-wing?!
That's not believable...

He is left but he isn't woke!

I want to see how many other women will come forward and be with what kind of allegations. It looks like there could be many more!

He is just whom the government is against at the moment.
Those piling on are government simps.

To any sane person it seems illogical that the UK Government (they seem deranged by the way) will be after an individual like Brand and after Rumble for not having banned or demonetized Brand.

There could be something else going on at the same time. Something others haven't considered yet. Let's see if we find anything....

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Muldar

Used to be. Gone all alt right a while ago.

I'll need some examples please. Unless questioning covid and the Ukraine war is suddenly alt right.

originally posted by: UpThenDown

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Muldar

Used to be. Gone all alt right while ago.

So you say he isn't left-wing?!
That's not believable...

He is left but he isn't woke!

I want to see how many other women will come forward and be with what kind of allegations. It looks like there could be many more!

not sure how you define 'woke' but he is a vegan, wishes he was bisexual, supports socialsim etc, does any of that make him 'woke', Ive never understood what the definition is, perhaps you could give me your defintion of woke?

Is Russell Brand Embracing Veganism Once Again? A Glimpse Into His Vegan Journey

Russell Brand: 'I wish I were bisexual - I'm tedious with my heterosexuality'

Russell Brand’s socialist revolution

Russell Brand Calls For Left-Wing Revolution

Russell Brand says he had gay sex in a toilet as it was filmed for a TV documentary series exploring social taboos

This isn't a thread about what is woke or bisexual.

I will repeat that Brand is left wing but not woke.

It looks like there are many after him. From the UK Government, to online platforms like YouTube, to anonymous people who have made allegations against him. Some of them very serious.

a reply to: UpThenDown

The media and progressives just uses alt right and all the isms to let you know he isn't a team player and needs to be destroyed.

a reply to: Muldar

you were the poster that mentioned he is not 'woke' its now part of the discussion isnt it?

so what is woke in your opinion?

a reply to: Muldar

Still engaging with the Sex Abuser apologetics and denialism of reality and defending wealthy woke ideology?

originally posted by: UpThenDown
a reply to: Muldar

you were the poster that mentioned he is not 'woke' its now part of the discussion isnt it?

so what is woke in your opinion?

Just mention it.
Not wanted to discuss the definition of woke.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Muldar

Still engaging with the Sex Abuser apologetics and denialism of reality and defending wealthy woke ideology?

Ermmm.... No!

You're trying to avoid to answer my post


This

Russell Brand is definitely left wing.
Everyone knows it.

He discusses a range of issues such as vaccine harms and deaths, pharmaceutical interests and conflicts of interest, the way in Ukraine, etc. Far from being conspiracy theories.

And as always, everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: shooterbrody

Plod arrested her, not the Government?

Yeah….
They don’t work for the government?
Lol
Interesting you have yet to show any issue with the thought crime, but are gung ho on hanging brand.

Says a lot.

Good day!

a reply to: JDmOKI

A wildly popular clip from one of his videos about the Dutch nitrate crisis offers a classic conspiracy theory mashup: a tangle of claims that may be true in other contexts, random accusations, scapegoating and resonances with some old and very ugly tropes. He claims that “this whole fertiliser situation is a scam”. The real objective is “to bankrupt the farmers so their land can be grabbed”. This “shows you how the Great Reset operates”, using “globalist” regulations to throw farmers off their land. He claims it’s “connected to the land grab of Bill Gates” and the “corruption of companies like Monsanto”.

In reality, the Dutch government was forced to act by a legal ruling, as levels of nitrate pollution, largely from livestock farms, break European law. Its attempts to curb this pollution have nothing to do with the World Economic Forum and its vacuous rhetoric about a “Great Reset”. Or with Bill Gates. Or with Monsanto, which hasn’t existed since 2018 when it was bought by Bayer. So why mention them? Perhaps because these terms have become potent click triggers.

Brand is repeating claims first made by far-right conspiracists, who have piled into this issue, claiming that the nitrate crisis is a pretext to seize land from farmers, in whom, they claim, true Dutch identity is vested, and hand it to asylum seekers and other immigrants. It’s a version of the “great replacement” conspiracy theory, itself a reworking of the Nazis’ blood and soil tropes about protecting the “rooted” and “authentic” people – in whom “racial purity” and “true” German identity was vested – from “cosmopolitan” and “alien” forces (ie Jews). Brand may not realise this, as the language has changed a little – “cosmopolitans” have become “globalists”, “aliens” have become “immigrants” – but the themes have not.

I would say Brand is more of a populist conspiracy pusher (don't forget he also claimed he didn't vote and told people not to either) and goes with what ever gets him clicks and likes like many who are only after money from their videos do. Like Icke and others, he's trying to live of his following like a cult/sect leader does.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Gung ho on hanging Brand?

Put words in my mouth that I never said, why don't you?!!!

More thought crime, eh?

a reply to: shooterbrody


You're right. Both the UK and the Republic of Ireland are passing these "thought crime" laws. If a person is accused of such, they may have to prove that their "intent" wasn't "offensive" to whatever "protected person(s)" claim to have been offended. So you had better not "intend to incite hatred".

Protected characteristics include race, color, nationality, religion, national or ethnic origin, descent, gender, sex characteristics, sexual orientation, or disability. What's next? Astrological sign?

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: JDmOKI

A wildly popular clip from one of his videos about the Dutch nitrate crisis offers a classic conspiracy theory mashup: a tangle of claims that may be true in other contexts, random accusations, scapegoating and resonances with some old and very ugly tropes. He claims that “this whole fertiliser situation is a scam”. The real objective is “to bankrupt the farmers so their land can be grabbed”. This “shows you how the Great Reset operates”, using “globalist” regulations to throw farmers off their land. He claims it’s “connected to the land grab of Bill Gates” and the “corruption of companies like Monsanto”.

In reality, the Dutch government was forced to act by a legal ruling, as levels of nitrate pollution, largely from livestock farms, break European law. Its attempts to curb this pollution have nothing to do with the World Economic Forum and its vacuous rhetoric about a “Great Reset”. Or with Bill Gates. Or with Monsanto, which hasn’t existed since 2018 when it was bought by Bayer. So why mention them? Perhaps because these terms have become potent click triggers.

Brand is repeating claims first made by far-right conspiracists, who have piled into this issue, claiming that the nitrate crisis is a pretext to seize land from farmers, in whom, they claim, true Dutch identity is vested, and hand it to asylum seekers and other immigrants. It’s a version of the “great replacement” conspiracy theory, itself a reworking of the Nazis’ blood and soil tropes about protecting the “rooted” and “authentic” people – in whom “racial purity” and “true” German identity was vested – from “cosmopolitan” and “alien” forces (ie Jews). Brand may not realise this, as the language has changed a little – “cosmopolitans” have become “globalists”, “aliens” have become “immigrants” – but the themes have not.

I would say Brand is more of a populist conspiracy pusher (don't forget he also claimed he didn't vote and told people not to either) and goes with what ever gets him clicks and likes like many who are only after money from their videos do. Like Icke and others, he's trying to live of his following like a sect leader does.

I wonder whether I should give you a start for this post. You keep referring to Icke and make comparisons with Brand!!

Icke seems to be your favourite character among the conspiracy theorists. But he hasn't been accused yet...

a reply to: Kurokage

And guilty of wrong Think. Anytime the media and governments, especially the UK government, I automatically believe its a coordinated hit job.

The man is innocent until proven guilty and I also gonna need some proof of wrong doing that's not decades old.

How are they going to prove a five year old stalking claim? If it was so serious why didn't they report it.... Five years ago or do the cops just suck and their jobs in the UK?

a reply to: Muldar

so its ok for you to claim someone isnt 'woke' but not give the definition, how can anyone be sure what you are saying is true then?

please define woke and then perhaps I can show you he is 'woke' or perhaps you will be correct he isnt, but without your defintion its hard to accept you just typing "he isnt woke" as factual

Just list a few things that make someone 'woke' in your opinion

a reply to: Muldar

OH NO a terrifying half pint comedian that just happens to have riled up the wrong powerful people with his outspoken critique of there often illegal and otherwise always morally questionable behaviour is stalking someone.

Seriously he is being framed.

Lie Detectors often don't work but still I would like to see these people take a lie detector test.

a reply to: JDmOKI

Well, many old Nazi concentration camp guards have been successfully prosecuted.

With decades old proof of wrongdoing.

Perhaps you'd have given them a free pass?