The Impeachment Inquiry of U.S. President Joseph R. Biden - Charges and Developments.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

Has President Biden received any money?

Yes.

That's why bank records are being subpoenaed.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

Has President Biden received any money?

Once it's proven he did receive $$, will you finally admit to being hoodwinked?

a reply to: Threadbare

The evidence shows clearly that he allowed Hunter to sell his govt position. THats called influence peddling. Hunter was bag man. Joe got his cut. Hunter complains about that in an email.

Are your fingers still in your ears and your eyes still closed?

a reply to: DBCowboy

So you're saying at this point you have no proof, but you're hoping subpoenaed records will show that.

At this point GOP witness Turley is correct. There is no evidence to impeach the President. That evidence is needed. All of the people involved,interview with 1023 witness and as that is 2nd hand, interview with the original source, actual records showing money was received by the President.

a reply to: Threadbare

Lets ask the Mayor of Moscow's wife how she escaped the sanctions.

a reply to: frogs453

My understanding is that a formal impeachment inquiry gives more power to obtain the evidence: i.e. bank records et.al.

originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: UpThenDown

Actually I'm in Okinawa now cycling the tropical Islands so it's a little free time to vent my expressions while not expression but my emotions of the downfall of the political landscape that is happening in America.

Do you think caps lock makes your point more succinct?

To others that read the thread in all the days and years ahead it will just make you look unhinged, you can make a valid point without capslock

a reply to: DBCowboy

You mean the thousands of pages of bank records the committee already has that don't show a single payment to Biden?

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: DBCowboy

So you're saying at this point you have no proof, but you're hoping subpoenaed records will show that.

At this point GOP witness Turley is correct. There is no evidence to impeach the President. That evidence is needed. All of the people involved,interview with 1023 witness and as that is 2nd hand, interview with the original source, actual records showing money was received by the President.

Biden can clear this up today and offer his banking records.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Were the wives of the mayors of other Russian cities included in the sanction list?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

You mean the thousands of pages of bank records the committee already has that don't show a single payment to Biden?

Why would a communist country give millions to Hunter and at the same time, Joe Biden do favors for said communist country?

Are you saying it's all a magical coincidence?

*magic*

a reply to: DBCowboy

What favors were done?

a reply to: DBCowboy

He would if he has nothing to hide! And it would clear his only remaining son. One would think a father would go to great lengths to demonstrate Hunter's innocence if he was.

He would lay out all the legitmate business, he would open all the books, all the taxes, everything transparent and made public.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

What favors were done?

*sigh*

Previously listed.

but. . . since you don't know how to Google. . .

The latest round of records, obtained by the Oversight Committee from four of the Bidens’ 12 apparent banks, detail yet another round of these payments — this time from China and Romania to the Bidens.

One $3 million payment came from the company of Gabriel Popoviciu, who is the subject of a criminal corruption probe in Romania, to the accounts of Biden family associate Rob Walker mere weeks after Biden, then-vice president, welcomed Romanian leaders to the White House to discuss “anti-corruption efforts” and just more than a year after Biden lectured in Romania about the threat corruption poses to national security. Those transactions were quickly funneled to Owasco (one of Hunter’s 15 companies), a Biden associate’s company, one of Hunter’s personal bank accounts, Hallie Biden, and “an unknown Biden bank account.”

The Romanian payments, the Oversight Committee alleges, further prove that the Bidens’ influence peddling operation was in full swing while Biden facilitated foreign policy discussions, especially in Eastern Europe, during the Obama administration.

The newest Romanian payment dilution strongly resembles how the Bidens appeared to use their more than a dozen companies to coordinate with Chinese nationals suspected of close ties to the Chinese Communist Party and “engage in financial deception.”

thefederalist.com...

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: DBCowboy

So you're saying at this point you have no proof, but you're hoping subpoenaed records will show that.

Hmm. That sounds exactly like some other case recently played out in NY. Do you condemn that one on the same grounds?

Education - The opposite of ignorance

But You do You lol

This is an Inquiry

Inquiry
noun
in·​qui·​ry in-ˈkwī(-ə)r-ē ˈin-ˌkwī(-ə)r-ē; ˈin-kwə-rē ˈiŋ-; ˈin-ˌkwir-ē
plural - inquiries

1
: a request for information
2
: a systematic investigation often of a matter of public interest
3
: examination into facts or principles : RESEARCH

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

You mean the thousands of pages of bank records the committee already has that don't show a single payment to Biden?

We get it. You aren't interested in the truth. Nobody paid Al Pacino a personal dime either.

a reply to: carewemust

And now it seems like this just blew up in the GOP face.
I hope they get better witness testimony because this is just embarrassing imo.

originally posted by: Stopstealingmycountry
a reply to: carewemust

And now it seems like this just blew up in the GOP face.
I hope they get better witness testimony because this is just embarrassing imo.

On the contrary.

Watching the hearing, I paid more attention to the leftists and their desire to ignore, obfuscate, distort the issue.

They sounded like online people who work for Soros and are paid to push a leftist agenda.

a reply to: Threadbare

Not a relevant question.