Russell Brand denies 'serious criminal allegations' he claims are being made against him

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

There wont be any police movement until after the broadcast which has not long finished.
Tomorrow is another day.
Plus, wouldn't the women have to press charges or do the police investigate public criminal accusations anyway?
Rainbows
Jane

a reply to: olaru12

Also unfortunately, many people are still entrapped in the MAGA Qanon matrix and will only believe what their confirmation bias tells them.

I think it's maniacal any one can take this seriously. Just look at the story?

5 women all ex's all just decide to get together and dream up allogations
against Mr. Brand? After how long? With no incentive to do so?

GTFO!

Can't buy it

a reply to: Saloon

"Dream up allegations"?

Good God man.

Yeah, I bet you think they were all asking for it.

One of them was 16 at the time.

Is that a "woman" in your book?

"Dream up allegations"?

You buy that?!!!!!!

BBC News - Russell Brand accused of rape and sexual assault
www.bbc.co.uk...

Interesting.

"A second woman alleges that Brand assaulted her when he was in his early 30s and she was 16 and still at school. She alleges he referred to her as "the child" during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship"

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Yeah, I bet you think they were all asking for it.

One of them was 16 at the time.

The fact that he allegedly called her "The child" doesn't bode well either considering the creepy implication.

a reply to: andy06shake

Indeed. But some folk on here also act as apologists for the likes of Lucy Letby?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

That's how i canny fathom the psychology behind some of the causes and crazy schemes they choose to champion or entertain.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

"Dream up allegations"?

Yeah I can say they dreamed up allogations. Since they all
just jumped out of nowhere together. Sounds like it has to be
coordinated by someone some where. Use your brains for a second
Read a book.

a reply to: Saloon

It's funny you should mention books.

Allegedly Brand had "the child" read "Lolita".

Just not in the ha'ha sort of way.

a reply to: Saloon

And these allegations are?

We don't know yet.

a reply to: andy06shake

Oooh.

So folk on here like to defend kiddie fiddlers?

www.theguardian.com...

Let's see what we can dig up

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Some folk on here would argue that black is white if it serves their agenda carpy2 despite the facts and evidence to the contrary

But i suppose i digress and run the risk of going off-topic.

Russell Brand accused of rape, sexual assaults and abuse

As her taxi approached Russell Brand’s home, Alice remembers the driver begging her not to go inside. Recognising the destination, he had started to ask questions. Alice admitted she was 16 and still in school. She says the driver replied that his daughter was the same age and entreated Alice: “Please, I’m asking you not to go in there, you could be my little girl, and I would want someone to do this for her.” He offered to take her home without charge, but Alice insisted she was fine. “He had just such a sad look in his eyes,” she recalls.

On their first date, she claims Brand asked her as soon as they met to confirm she was definitely 16, saying: “I don’t give a f*** if you’re 12 . . . I need to know where I stand legally.” During the earliest stages of their relationship, Alice says Brand was “very charming and very attentive”, sending her “verbose” messages. She remembers feeling “giddy” and “special”. Before the first time they had sex, Alice says she told him she was a virgin and claims he was instantly aroused. “He was like, ‘Oh my God, my baby, my baby’, and picked me up and cradled me in his arms like a child and was stroking my hair. He’s like, ‘You’re like my little dolly.’

Nadia alleges that she told Brand to get off her and that she wanted to leave, but he carried on. “I’m stuck underneath the painting and he’s pushing up against me,” she says. “He’s a lot taller than me. And he has that glazed look in his eye again. And I can’t move. And I told him, ‘Get off, get off.’” Nadia claims that Brand pushed her up against the wall and raped her, without a condom. Brand finally finished and she says she pushed him away. “And then he blocks the door that I’ve come into because he doesn’t want me going,” Nadia says. “He’s like, ‘Are you OK?’ I’m like, ‘No I’m not OK, you need to get away from me.’ And he’s like, ‘Let’s calm down.’” Nadia says that Brand eventually stepped away from the door he had been blocking after Nadia told him she wanted to use the bathroom. “I ran out and I jumped in my car — thank God I didn’t park in his driveway — and booked it out of there,” she says. “That was it. I sat on the road a little bit longer. I was in a daze.” At 3.29am, Brand sent Nadia a text message.

During other Radio 2 episodes, Brand made a series of sexual remarks about the newsreader Andrea Simmons, describing her on air as “erotic” and a “sex bomb”, and telling listeners that he would like to “go under the desk” while she was reading the news. Several times after this it is implied that Brand was forced to apologise by BBC production staff. In May 2007, Brand called Jimmy Savile, who suggested the pair could meet if Brand brought along a sister. Brand doesn’t have a sister, so instead offered to bring a female employee — agreeing, on Savile’s request, that she should be naked. “I’ve got a personal assistant,” he said. “And part of her job description is that anyone I demand she greet, meet, massages, she has to do it. She’s very attractive, Jimmy.” This was four years before Savile’s death and five years before details of the Jim’ll Fix It presenter’s crimes were exposed.

feel free to defend him or accuse him however you wish, im just adding the current accusations/evidence so people know what they are defending/accusing him of

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: andy06shake

Oooh.

So folk on here like to defend kiddie fiddlers?

Who is doing that? What is the age of consent in the UK Carpy? Is there any suggestion that Brand had relations with someone under age?

You also jumped on someone who said, effectively, that the allegations are likely false and certainly coordinated. Then you said we don’t know what the allegations actually are. Interesting footwork.

It does seem odd, doesn’t it, that these allegations are appearing now? I mean I think anyone with any degree of intelligence might be able to see that. They may also be able to ascertain why. Obviously some won’t.

Yip another Jimmy Saville fan , him and Philip schofield ,, a lot more to this than meets the eye .

Poetic justice for the late Andrew saccs

a reply to: UpThenDown

Ha ha I'll defend that tweet right down the line.

Where's the evidence?

a reply to: Saloon

what tweet? i dont do twitter

The phone number has been confirmed to be Brands, so perhaps that is evidence?

The US phone number that Brand used to send the messages has been verified by multiple sources.

a reply to: UpThenDown

The phone number has been confirmed to be Brands, so perhaps that is evidence?

Oh sh1t howdy! Tweet or what ever who gives a fly'n monkey crap.
Tell me evidence of what? Exactly! Oh wait not wearing a condom?
Are you serious brother?

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

Only read your OP so far.

Not one to pre-judge anyone.

But if he's guilty I'll volunteer to chop the #s head off.

Just because people agree with him on things doesn't mean he's innocent, just because people disagree with him on things doesn't mean he's guilty.
Let the judicial process take its coursel