Russell Brand denies 'serious criminal allegations' he claims are being made against him

a reply to: Grenade

So, let's just ignore his alleged victims, eh?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

They are accusers......not victims.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

They are, like I said, "alleged victims".

No?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

No, not at all. But putting the cart before the horse a little.

Hi might be innocent, he'll never get back what he's lost and these anonymous girls have nothing to lose.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

How do you know?


news.sky.com...

"None of the four victims know each other and no one was paid to contribute."

So the 4 didn’t know each other......but they were all approached by reporters.

How can you be sure they were not offered money for their story?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Itisnowagain

They are, like I said, "alleged victims".

No?

Perhaps you need to consult Andy on this?
He said these women were victims who have spoken out. So he believes they're victims and hence he thinks Russell Brand is guilty as charged in the media.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Sky news, that bastion of truth and knowledge. Just a question but you think there's ever been corruption in the media, maybe a few envelopes under tables.

How did that guy Robert Maxwell die again?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

How do you know?


news.sky.com...

"None of the four victims know each other and no one was paid to contribute."

Victims?

Alleged victims.

a reply to: Grenade

If it goes to trial they will find it very unpleasant and will face cross examination which is not very pleasant in these types of cases.

Do they have to have something to lose?

You seem to assume they are liars.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Yes.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

That's why I said "apparently"?

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

It hasn't even become a legal matter as of yet. However, his career, reputation and platform have been destroyed.

The media never thought in a year of investigations to bring any of this to the authorities?

I think we should explore the motivations for the investigation. Remember he worked at Channel 4 while all this was going on and they didn't care much when the shows raked in £50 million. It's an absolute masterstroke from them, making money while saying "look at all the sh!t we turned a blind eye to while this clown worked for us". How many people did they need to contact to get this show put together. He's slept with a lot of women, i'd assume a lot of phone calls didn't paint the picture the show portrays.

He would be a fool to take on the media and government with skeletons like this in the closet. Unless of course he's nothing more than a puppet for an ideology.

What happens if they fail to indict him?
Or let's say they succeed but they fail to prove he is guilty.

It's more of a rhetorical question.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Does the sky link actually state that none of the accusers were offered money from the newspaper for their stories?

I am not willing to read all that ....to find out if it does.

a reply to: Grenade

Who's "Rupert Maxwell"?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

We'll, you could be bothered to read the short sentence I quoted?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Grenade

If it goes to trial they will find it very unpleasant and will face cross examination which is not very pleasant in these types of cases.

Do they have to have something to lose?

You seem to assume they are liars.

you seem to assume there is enough to go to trial if you we were a women you'd know the chances of a trial pretty remote even if it happened last night and the police had dna evidence.... something happening in the not to distant past is even more remote not least because the likes of c4 created the lad environment this all flourished in..

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Robert, my iphone is a cow, just like you.

a reply to: AlienBorg

He could sue for defamation?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

I see you have added the quotation marks now...thanks.