House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announces formal impeachment inquiry against President Biden

a reply to: burntheships

Cheers, mate.

And "none of the above"!

I thought there were rules about going after another member making disparaging remarks? Aren't you a moderator?

a reply to: spacedoubt

originally posted by: Stopstealingmycountry
a reply to: Stopthebull

Damn dude you really are just not that smart. And your tantrum really isn't helping you...like at all man.
Great job on the name calling though.
Unlike you I have been having an adult conversation and doing my best to inform and get informed.
Maybe try that some time in-between the name calling and tantrums.

Well you’re not dealing with the facts . You are ignorant . I just told you the facts and you have your fingers stuck in your ear . Did he have classified information he wasn’t supposed to at his private residence and elsewhere ? That’s a big crime . You didn’t even bother to comment on that , you just called me stupid . You don’t inform anyone of anything . You’re the most uninformed person on this website .

I told you what you asked . It’s 100 percent proof positive . He had classified documents he wasn’t supposed to all over the place . That’s illegal . You’re not trying to get informed or you’d know those facts that have been proven . Biden had classified docs he wasn’t entitled too all over the place . Obviously you’re a troll

originally posted by: Stopstealingmycountry
a reply to: carewemust

Bwahaha omg man my comment went right over your head!
But I'm glad you stuck to it and I'm sure the pressure you and others applied during the hammering really got ro him.
I'm sure he doesn't want to get a hammering again!

Bwahahaha , I know who you are . You’re the guy who had the trump mental breakdown and had to get off here for like 6 months . Hahahaha . I knew it . I just can’t think of your name . You don’t know the difference beteeen your and you’re and you talk about emotions and being butthurt but you never say anything intelligent . Hopefully your mental breakdown is coming again so we can get back to reason here.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Just trying to get this straight, so trying to impeach/charge one President is a witch hunt and an an attempt to interfere with his election campaign whilst trying to do the same to another one is perfectly OK?

That's how it seems to read from this side of the Pond.

Just curious.

One was invented out of thin air and the other one is the reality of what the President has been doing for decades. I really do not want him to get impeached so that he can run again, so I think it is best to wait.

With you, it is like some woman accuses me of rape just because I drop her as a girlfriend and it is all false and provable false, and then another guy actually rapes a girl with full proof and I say charge him, and then you call me a hypocrite for not seeing the two situations the same...lol

originally posted by: Stopthebull
I told you what you asked . It’s 100 percent proof positive . He had classified documents he wasn’t supposed to all over the place . That’s illegal . You’re not trying to get informed or you’d know those facts that have been proven . Biden had classified docs he wasn’t entitled too all over the place . Obviously you’re a troll

And he and Hillary were not the President at the time either, so had zero special access and powers that an actual President has over classified. The President is above the classification process, everyone else is not.

9.14.2023

It's important that the top Executives and Directors at Media Outlets pay the price for colluding with Democrats, when "retributions" begin flowing.

Can you even fathom the level of apoplexy that would have occurred if the executive branch under President Trump had dared to tell media how they must report on the impeachment process?

The fact that the U.S. government would be issuing guidelines on how journalists must report on the Joe Biden impeachment inquiry is yet another example of how the Democrats in power control the media.

Continued at: theconservativetreehouse.com... on/#more-250838

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Just trying to get this straight, so trying to impeach/charge one President is a witch hunt and an an attempt to interfere with his election campaign whilst trying to do the same to another one is perfectly OK?

That's how it seems to read from this side of the Pond.

Just curious.

It seems to me that you were just pointing out the irony of the situation, without taking sides. I think a few posters that responded to you missed that.

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

I just like a bit of balance, is all.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

I just like a bit of balance, is all.

As should we all. But I see some people, on both sides of the spectrum, that are just too quick to jump on to others because they've already decided in their mind that that person is guilty and should be shouted down. I think everybody can be right at times, so don't judge people strictly from their past (perceived) stances.

That exact thing happened to me here in a recent thread. I just didn't find a joke funny and three other posters called me every disparaging Liberal name in the book. Ha. Me a Liberal. That's hilarious.

TCB

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

I'm a woke Dem, a Marxist and a Communist, apparently.

On topic, I'll just watch and see how this impeachment thing pans out.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

I'm a woke Dem, a Marxist and a Communist, apparently.

That's exactly what I'm talking about! Don't you live in the U.K.? I'm pretty sure that there isn't a "Democrat Party" there, so how could you be a Dem?

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

That's right. Apparently, so I'm told, our right wing Tory Government is Socialist!

a reply to: network dude

NO evidence, NO votes, lmao. This is not going anywhere and will not go anywhere.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

I'm a woke Dem, a Marxist and a Communist, apparently.

On topic, I'll just watch and see how this impeachment thing pans out.

It isn't going to go anywhere, at all. Absolutely no evidence, and no votes. McCarthy is blowing smoke, as usual. The hilarious thing about all this is that a rule created in the Trump era requires votes for this that McCarthy doesn't have and won't ever get. lmao

originally posted by: spacemanjupiter
a reply to: network dude

NO evidence, NO votes, lmao. This is not going anywhere and will not go anywhere.

No evidence? OK, if that's how you want to go about this. But you might want to do just a little reading. that surprised look makes you look a bit silly and you will have that surprised look when you finally grasp what's going on here.

originally posted by: spacemanjupiter
a reply to: network dude

NO evidence, NO votes, lmao. This is not going anywhere and will not go anywhere.

You're wrong about the evidence just a 100% wrong. The evidence should
brand Joe Biden as a traitor in anyones mind.

The votes? You ever notice how many Republicans are really Democrats?
But no Democrats are really Republicans? I think he will be impeached but
the Senate will never let it fly.

But who cares when the proceedings bring power of subpoena? I think that's why
Joe seems to be crapping himself right now.

a reply to: Saloon

But who cares when the proceedings bring power of subpoena?

Not without a vote, it doesn't.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Saloon

But who cares when the proceedings bring power of subpoena?

Not without a vote, it doesn't.

so there is no benefit to allowing the information to sneak out to the voters on the left who have been lied to and told there is no evidence?

OK then.

But based on the numbers, there aren't billions needed to wake the fcuk up, only a few will do. And once they realize they were lied to in such a condescending way, they may stay a little angry at those who lied to them so fiercely.

a reply to: network dude

There is no subpoena power without a House vote. If Kevin is serious, he needs to put the impeachment inquiry to a vote.