It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: AlienBorg
From you source:
According to a local report that covered the story, the charges were dismissed because it could not be proven that the images were of individuals under the age of 18.
What if the images were of people 18 yrs or older? Without evidence everyone is crucifying this guy.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: AlienBorg
They won't leave children alone!
It's a sickness!
originally posted by: olaru12
If you have had any experience with school boards, you know they don't really care about education, teachers, principals etc. School boards are just implements for wanna be politicians to get started.
Obviously the school superintendent signed off on him...maybe they had a "thing"!
School teachers are in short supply now....epic responsibility with the kids.... low pay, and no support from the board or administration.
I have a teaching credential and knew very soon after I did my student teaching....not for me!!!
originally posted by: mtnshredder
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Who looks at resume's and says, "Well drag queen is a plus!"
SFUSD
originally posted by: AlienBorg
As a parent, how confident you would be for the quality of education of your children and the ethos & principles of the school they're attending if you were to find out the principal of this school is a draw queen who has been investigated in the past for child pornography (charges were eventually dropped according to the article)
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: AlienBorg
As a parent, how confident you would be for the quality of education of your children and the ethos & principles of the school they're attending if you were to find out the principal of this school is a draw queen who has been investigated in the past for child pornography (charges were eventually dropped according to the article)
It depends. Is there any evidence that they were actually in possession of any child pornography?
Yes: kill them
No: give them a chance at this job
originally posted by: FlyersFan
Well ... with all the LGBTQ propaganda like 'Pride Puppy' being taught in the schools, and glorifying drag queens and gay events, and showing porn and pretending it's sex education, I'm not surprised at this at all. It's the next step in their agenda. It's sick.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
Well ... with all the LGBTQ propaganda like 'Pride Puppy' being taught in the schools, and glorifying drag queens and gay events, and showing porn and pretending it's sex education, I'm not surprised at this at all. It's the next step in their agenda. It's sick.
originally posted by: AlienBorg
The investigation for possession of child pornography is an additional issue to a school that has employed a drag queen as the principal. The ethos & principles of a school cannot be compatible with drag queens and whatever is associated with this role.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: AlienBorg
The investigation for possession of child pornography is an additional issue to a school that has employed a drag queen as the principal. The ethos & principles of a school cannot be compatible with drag queens and whatever is associated with this role.
HOW SO? The drag queens that I know personally look and act like normal everyday men when they're not on stage. One of them is even straight with a wife and 2 kids. He's managed to make it to age 45 without harming a child so far.
It's a non-issue that you don't understand.