It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: Klassified
Once again, Raffensperger directly testified to those grand juries. How would the prosecutors lie about what the jurors heard with their own ears?
originally posted by: dandandat2
Why do you assume the hygienics during the 2020 elections was coordinated? Temperatures were running high then as they are now. Its not hard to believe that a material number of disgruntled tribesmen from the Democrat party took it upon themselves in an uncoordinated fashion to do one small thing after another to tip the scales in Joe Biden's favor.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: carewemust
The desperation in your recent posts is rather patent. I suggest taking a break until you have something substantive to celebrate -- an agreement to delay one of the trials beyond November 2024, for instance.
It would be a nice break for the rest of us, too.
The desperation in your recent posts is rather patent. I suggest taking a break until you have something substantive to celebrate -- an agreement to delay one of the trials beyond November 2024, for instance. It would be a nice break for the rest of us, too.
Continued at: www.washingtonexaminer.com...
John Eastman, one of the defendants in the wide-ranging Georgia RICO case, criticized the case Friday. He claimed the evidence was "weak" and predicted all defendants would be vindicated at their trials.
Eastman, who previously served as an attorney for former President Donald Trump, has been indicted by a grand jury in an alleged scheme to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia. Prosecutors allege Eastman was a central figure in the scheme, which included setting up a fraudulent slate of electoral votes for the state.
“I think if we get a fair trial in Fulton County, whether that’s in state court or federal court, I’m confident that we’ll be fully vindicated,” Eastman told Fox News on Friday. “Not just me, but all the defendants.”
The attorney accused the case of being weak in evidence and high in politics, stating the legal aspect was just "5%" of the fight, while politics was the rest.
Eastman also claimed a broad racketeering case against a former president was setting a "very dangerous" precedent.
“Our federal criminal code and our state criminal code have gotten so expansive and so vague that any one of us can be charged by a creative prosecutor with three felonies a day,” Eastman said.
Eastman defended his actions in Georgia, claiming he had a right to legally question the results of the 2020 presidential election. Eastman added that he would do it again if he could.
originally posted by: darkbake
This is why you do not believe in bull# with no evidence... his thoughts that the Georgia election were rigged were based on emotion and speculation. That's okay, it is just stupid to make major decisions like overthrowing the government on false data.
More at: theconservativetreehouse.com...-250650
Even Judge McAfee seemed to admit the madness before him when he said, “it could potentially even be a six-month turnaround just for the 11th Circuit to come up with a decision!”, referring to the Atlanta-based federal appeals court that would handle appeals from individuals claiming the state has no jurisdiction.
“Where does that leave us in the middle of a jury trial?” the judge asked, although he also seemed to concur that Powell and Chesebro have a right under Georgia law to have their trials start next month as they have demanded.
originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: carewemust
Woodward represented Taveras and Nauta. How is there not a conflict of interest in having Woodward question a former client?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Woodward is worried Taveras will testify that Woodward instructed him to lie. It's the exact same thing we saw with Hutchinson.
These people need to learn, your Trump provided lawyer does not have your best interest at heart. They have Trump's.