posted on Sep, 3 2023 @ 10:54 PM
a reply to:
Waterglass
Yeah, used to be they just used it on outspoken celebrities.
Basic wealthy person rule of thumb, have all your affairs in order if your going to hit below the beltway.
Trump's, let's just call it, problems with the word "no", make it easier for the loopholes to trip him. He provokes people. His antagonist victimhood
gets under enough peoples skin, and pushes selfish boundaries enough, for the spirit of law to fly out the window as the book flies in.
Obviously, the portion that doesn't like his influences is stronger in federal agencies. They don't like his lack of character, if I had to guess.
Don't like him. Want him neutralized.
It's sorta like when a cop knows a suspect is selling drugs or doing something illegal that harms the city they protect. They telegraph their
criminality. And then the cop will think, "Oh hey, he just made a gesture while standing in the street, I think that's enough."
It was all bias. It was dislike of a certain type of person tightening the application of things normally not spun into as much as possible.
edit on 3-9-2023 by Degradation33 because: (no reason given)