It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The same codes needed to thwart errors in quantum computers may also give the fabric of space-time its intrinsic robustness.
So, how do quantum error-correcting codes work? The trick to protecting information in jittery qubits is to store it not in individual qubits, but in patterns of entanglement among many.
Abstract
This article discusses the mathematics behind the Quantum Gates as applied to the Quansistor and also some standard single qubit Quantum gates like Hadamard gate, Pauli X and Pauli Z gates. Quansistors use quantum tunneling probability of electron (say) to jump over a thin non conducting layer to define the state of a qubit. An electron passing through a Quansistor represents something like a qubit. Some edits made in the version.
So there's a clear purpose for the design of the universe. It's to process, store, transfer and manipulate quantum information which allows us to build quantum and classical computers because we have the breath of life from God which gives us understanding of these things.
This is a completely absurd strawman claim, completely opposite of reality.
originally posted by: neoholographic
So when you look at the universe, you see order. It amazes me how non-believers will try to argue that there's no order in the Cosmos.
That doesn't make any sense at all, since for almost all on mankind's existence on Earth, we have been unable to build quantum computers.
So there's a clear purpose for the design of the universe. It's to process, store, transfer and manipulate quantum information which allows us to build quantum and classical computers because we have the breath of life from God which gives us understanding of these things.
originally posted by: cooperton
The law of the US Constitution has upheld this country for almost 250 years, it was contrived by intelligent people who wanted to create and persist the United States.
Similarly, The laws of physics have constituted all matter and upheld the existence of everything since the beginning of time, it was contrived by an intelligent super-being who wants to create and persist living souls.
No good laws ever came to be without intelligence.
originally posted by: cooperton
The law of the US Constitution has upheld this country for almost 250 years, it was contrived by intelligent people who wanted to create and persist the United States.
Similarly, The laws of physics have constituted all matter and upheld the existence of everything since the beginning of time, it was contrived by an intelligent super-being who wants to create and persist living souls.
No good laws ever came to be without intelligence.
originally posted by: cooperton
The law of the US Constitution has upheld this country for almost 250 years, it was contrived by intelligent people who wanted to create and persist the United States.
Similarly, The laws of physics have constituted all matter and upheld the existence of everything since the beginning of time, it was contrived by an intelligent super-being who wants to create and persist living souls.
No good laws ever came to be without intelligence.
originally posted by: SigmaXSquared
the us constitution defines the civic rights, autonomy, dignity of the republic and its citizens
the laws of physics define the behavior of objects in relation to space
originally posted by: ErosA433
Fine
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: SigmaXSquared
the us constitution defines the civic rights, autonomy, dignity of the republic and its citizens
the laws of physics define the behavior of objects in relation to space
The laws of the constitution define the allowed behaviors of people to others
The laws of the physical world define the allowed behaviors of particles to others
originally posted by: ErosA433
Fine
Still awaiting your response in the other thread
By nature, laws of Physics are stated facts which have been deduced and derived based on empirical observations. Simply put, the world around us works in a certain way, and physical laws are a way of classifying that “working.”
Physical laws are just conclusions drawn based on years (or however long it takes) of scientific observations and experiments which are repeated over and over under different conditions to reach inferences which can be accepted worldwide. These are continuously validated by the scientific community over time.
originally posted by: Phantom423
By nature, laws of Physics are stated facts which have been deduced and derived based on empirical observations. Simply put, the world around us works in a certain way, and physical laws are a way of classifying that “working.”
Physical laws are just conclusions drawn based on years (or however long it takes) of scientific observations and experiments which are repeated over and over under different conditions to reach inferences which can be accepted worldwide. These are continuously validated by the scientific community over time.
Observation, empirical evidence, conclusions. No magic wand required.
You have no idea what my point was, when I quoted the OP saying "So when you look at the universe, you see order. It amazes me how non-believers will try to argue that there's no order in the Cosmos."?
originally posted by: cooperton
I have no idea what your point is here, are you saying our empirical assertions about physics are more fundamental than the actual physics themselves? That's nonsense.
A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Phantom423
By nature, laws of Physics are stated facts which have been deduced and derived based on empirical observations. Simply put, the world around us works in a certain way, and physical laws are a way of classifying that “working.”
Physical laws are just conclusions drawn based on years (or however long it takes) of scientific observations and experiments which are repeated over and over under different conditions to reach inferences which can be accepted worldwide. These are continuously validated by the scientific community over time.
Observation, empirical evidence, conclusions. No magic wand required.
I have no idea what your point is here, are you saying our empirical assertions about physics are more fundamental than the actual physics themselves? That's nonsense.
And no, it's not a magic wand, it's intelligent design bro lol. physics do not perpetuate unintelligently, that is for sure!
Empirical evidence is information acquired by observation or experimentation. Scientists record and analyze this data. The process is a central part of the scientific method, leading to the proving or disproving of a hypothesis and our better understanding of the world as a result.
Oops, I see that now.
originally posted by: cooperton
a reply to: Arbitrageur
My response was to phantom, you were talking to neoholographic.
But I might as well chime in now, do you believe the cosmos are ordered?
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: SigmaXSquared
the us constitution defines the civic rights, autonomy, dignity of the republic and its citizens
the laws of physics define the behavior of objects in relation to space
The laws of the constitution define the allowed behaviors of people to others
The laws of the physical world define the allowed behaviors of particles to others
Obviously they are not exactly the same, but even if they're apples and oranges, they're both fruits that come from intelligence.
originally posted by: ErosA433
Fine
Still awaiting your response in the other thread