It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: 727Sky
The title says it all! DOJ wants to mandate the hiring of illegals at the Space X facilities.. Yes there will be many who will not believe this however this information comes directly from the office of public affairs U.S. department of justice. The full title is: Justice Department Sues SpaceX for Discriminating Against Asylees and Refugees in Hiring.. I guess if the illegals get a job the U.S. government can stop giving them $2200 a month in living expenses... shove their B.S. on someone else's shoulders ...
.....
They're not here illegally.
"“Asylee” is the term used in the U.S. for people who have been granted asylum. Under U.S. immigration law, a person granted asylum is legally allowed to remain in the country without fear of deportation. They qualify to work, travel abroad and apply for their spouse or children under the age of 21 to join them. Asylees have the opportunity to become permanent residents, and eventually, citizens, provided that they meet all other requirements."
www.rescue.org...#:~:text=“Asylee”%20is%20the%20term%20used,of%2021%20to%20join%20them.
Because they are here legally, it would be stupid to not let them work. That would just make them a burden on everyone else.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: EternalShadow
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 727Sky
ANOTHER reason to elect a non-traitor (aka a "Republican") in November 2024.
Pfft.
That's a crap shoot.🙄
Better than the "sure thing loser" who cheated his way into being our current leader.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: nugget1
Since much of Elon's funding comes from government branches, I expect he'll capitulate. I'm still not convinced 'X' isn't controlled opposition, as well as Musk himself.
Turns out that hiring non citizens is considered a no no because dealing with rockets is considered weapons related and a national security matter.Elons got the law on his side here.
originally posted by: billxam
a reply to: 727Sky
Well, SOMEONE has to sweep the floors. Just don't let them assemble highly technical rocket motors that have humans sitting on top of them. Let's not have rockets that blow up real good any more.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: nugget1
Since much of Elon's funding comes from government branches, I expect he'll capitulate. I'm still not convinced 'X' isn't controlled opposition, as well as Musk himself.
Turns out that hiring non citizens is considered a no no because dealing with rockets is considered weapons related and a national security matter.Elons got the law on his side here.
Musk talks about AI being the largest threat to humanity , yet is in control & developing AI beyond anything else seen.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: psychotrail
Why is that?
Because he's, or seems to be, an independent thinker/business mogul? Because he doesn't toe the company line??
Tell me, why is he dangerous??
originally posted by: psychotrail
Musk is dangerous
originally posted by: nugget1
Since much of Elon's funding comes from government branches, I expect he'll capitulate. I'm still not convinced 'X' isn't controlled opposition, as well as Musk himself.
Thats not my point, but rather an assumption on your part about me .
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: psychotrail
Musk is dangerous
originally posted by: nugget1
Since much of Elon's funding comes from government branches, I expect he'll capitulate. I'm still not convinced 'X' isn't controlled opposition, as well as Musk himself.
I totally get it. Being an advocate for free speech is detrimental to the left's plans of censoring "wrong speak".
Yeah & the Bush family & Cheney sure followed the law lol . When are you going to quit picking sides ? There is no one good in Washington politics.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: nugget1
Ya welcome. like another poster said here though was when has the democrats cared about the law? Its funny that a obviously flawed lawsuit such as this can even go foward after Musk can absolutely show the law on this.