Trump wins the GOP debates in absentia

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: PraetorianAZ

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
In the grand scheme, Biden was the winner. Trump doesn't standa a chance against him in a national election. Trump is widely unpopular outside of his shrinking flock of simps.

My hardcore Democrat parents and brother would disagree with you. They are all voting for Trump. Even my best "work" friend who is a never Trumper is going to vote for Trump. The only way Biden "wins" is through massive fraud like in 2020. Think AZ, GA, WI, PA, but 10x what we saw before.

How did you make that happen?
Normally hardcore Dems would cut their arm off before voting for Trump.

Their wallets made the decision for them not me.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
In the grand scheme, Biden was the winner. Trump doesn't standa a chance against him in a national election. Trump is widely unpopular outside of his shrinking flock of simps.

If there is massive fraud and cheating again, you would be correct.

In a fair and square election, Trump beats your brainless leader in a landslide.

Biden is an unmitigated disaster, anyone outside of the mentally unstable Dem cult knows it.

I think you underestimate how many people really don't like Trump and voted for Biden to prevent a 2nd term. I don't think cheating was needed. Much of the country is just very turned off by Trump. And it's not just TDS. Trump did it to himself by acting like a complete a$$ on many occasions.

Trump hasn't really learned anything, as he's still the same. I'm not saying Biden should be elected or Trump should be in jail. But rather that he had his time as POTUs, and we can definetly do better than Trump, and certainly Biden.

Sometimes it seems like people only want to elect a president that will hurt the opposing party. How many people are voting for Biden or Trump because they think they will do a great job?

Seems like the goal here is just to push biden vs trump to divide the country even more.

a reply to: Klassified

Actually looking at casino odds, Trump lost some ground but no one else closed the gap on him.
Before the debates he was listed as a 3.25 to 1 favorite, today he is down to a 2.65 to favorite, that roughly calculates to about 5% points.

I think he might have a surprise at Iowa, while a small sample size at least half of people in Iowa who are expected to attend the caucus do NOT want Trump, less than 40% strongly support him.

Still, even here, people are so stubbornly stuck in the narrative of divide. They’ve done such a good job all these years dangling you the illusion of democracy whilst setting you at each others throats.

The reason they want to destroy Trump is because he isn’t in the club. It should be obvious.

But you won’t change and realise that your country is more important, you’re just too busy wanting to be right and to back the winner, when the winners should be you.

originally posted by: Turquosie

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
In the grand scheme, Biden was the winner. Trump doesn't standa a chance against him in a national election. Trump is widely unpopular outside of his shrinking flock of simps.

If there is massive fraud and cheating again, you would be correct.

In a fair and square election, Trump beats your brainless leader in a landslide.

Biden is an unmitigated disaster, anyone outside of the mentally unstable Dem cult knows it.

I think you underestimate how many people really don't like Trump and voted for Biden to prevent a 2nd term. I don't think cheating was needed. Much of the country is just very turned off by Trump. And it's not just TDS. Trump did it to himself by acting like a complete a$$ on many occasions.

Trump hasn't really learned anything, as he's still the same. I'm not saying Biden should be elected or Trump should be in jail. But rather that he had his time as POTUs, and we can definetly do better than Trump, and certainly Biden.

Sometimes it seems like people only want to elect a president that will hurt the opposing party. How many people are voting for Biden or Trump because they think they will do a great job?

Seems like the goal here is just to push biden vs trump to divide the country even more.

Much like Trump originally by many was elected as a reaction to a dysfunctional system, the very same voters have likely noticed not only Biden’s laughably obvious flaws, but also Trumps less than trustworthy character. Or more Maga-jabs anyone? Ffs, wake up from the false dichotomy.

a reply to: jrod

To be fair, Iowa hasn't exactly been a bellwether for the GOP recently. 2016 they went Cruz, 2012 they went Santorum, and 2008 they went Huckabee.

originally posted by: nugget1
The RNC will do everything they can to push Ramaswamy to the top, IMO....and maybe even with a little help from the DNC.

Ramaswamy is cut from the same cloth all good career politicians are made of; wealth, an over-inflated ego and a lust for power. He's every bit as charismatic as Obama, and I suspect a lot more sympathetic to liberal policies than he's willing to let on.

In 2015 he made $37 million dollars selling a portion of his shares in the drug company he created, Roivant. In 2022 Roivant and Pfizer joined forces to form new company focused on developing a drug inflammatory and fibrotic diseases. I don't know about anybody else, but his connection to Pfizer and the development of new drugs has be on guard.

Ramaswamy graduated from Harvard, and even though his income for that year was $2 million he said he couldn't afford to fulfill his dream of furthering his education by going to Yale.
Paul Soros (George's brother) stepped in with a $90,000 gift, and off to Yale Ramaswamy went. He also raked in more than $2 million the next year.

I guess no matter how much money you have, it's never enough. He doesn't seem to be very 'in touch' with working class America, so I have my suspicions he wouldn't be working for the average Joe in he were POTUS.

Ramaswamy has be keynote speaker several times at the WEF on health issues. There's a fortune to be made in the health industry for well connected insiders, and with Ramaswamy at the helm I don't think lobbyists would even be needed.

I fear people who hate the corruption in politics will fall for Ramaswamy's beautiful words and vote in more of the same.

A guy that is a self made billonaire and obviously doesnt want or need any more money, who lays out an actual path to reforming the FBi, who is the first one with a plan to try to interrupt Black Rock and Vangards quiet creation of a technocracy strikes you as a guy that is a suck up to big tech/pharma? I highly doubt it.

Also your WEF part is false, he actually sued the WEF for putting him on the list a couple of times.: youtu.be...

And the Sorros thing he explained like he was a fool not to take that money. And Sorros funds litteraly thousands of people of who he thinks might create chaos at some point i feel.

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
In the grand scheme, Biden was the winner. Trump doesn't standa a chance against him in a national election. Trump is widely unpopular outside of his shrinking flock of simps.

I believe it's been scientifically proven that anyone who doesn't think like you is a simp.

Conversely, that makes you a DERP. But take your wins where you can.

a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Just curious. Are you a first time voter, or have you been around for a while? Honest inquiry. Not meaning to put you on the spot.

a reply to: Klassified

He Is WE and WE are He , Find Waldo , and See Clarity of Mind ........





....................









.........



....................

originally posted by: Consumer
a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Just curious. Are you a first time voter, or have you been around for a while? Honest inquiry. Not meaning to put you on the spot.

Im Dutch so I cant vote in the States, but since Trump came along and my countries media started the propaganda against him (copy pasting CNN) it opened my eyes to the whole woke agenda that came along with it around the same time. Which now also reached the Netherlands in full force. And since then I follow and am concerned with American politics basically. Why?

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian

Im Dutch so I cant vote in the States, but since Trump came along and my countries media started the propaganda against him (copy pasting CNN) it opened my eyes to the whole woke agenda that came along with it around the same time. Which now also reached the Netherlands in full force. And since then I follow and am concerned with American politics basically. Why?

Ok, I’m actually curious about your age to get a better context as to your position. Full disclosure, I’m European too.

a reply to: Consumer

I dont see how that would be relevant?

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: Consumer

I dont see how that would be relevant?

It would add context to your perspective. I’ll share my age. I’m 51.

a reply to: Consumer

Mid thirties, still find it strange you ask about it, think ive never seen that here. Care to discuss the content of my reply?

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: Consumer

Mid thirties, still find it strange you ask about it, think ive never seen that here. Care to discuss the content of my reply?

The reason I asked was simply your quite naive description of Trump as a “self made billionaire”, implying invulnerability to monetary or other manipulation. Something that even his most devoted fans hardly believe anymore.

I didn’t get at first why he wouldn’t participate, but it makes sense to me now. Why give the ‘sponsor’ any ratings. I applaud the decision.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: WeDemBoyz

Do you see him winning the election ?

More importantly, do you want him to win ?

Are you willing to shoot yourself in the foot because Orange Man Bad ?

Yes, yes they are.
It’s known as the retarded baby syndrome.
They will always be striving to get away with the most moronic, nasty, despicable “next thing”.
They may lose once or twice, but rest assured they will keep pursuing the grossest thing as many times as necessary. It may take 20-30 years.
When they win at the current rotten level, within 5 minutes they are laying the groundwork for the next disgusting step.
If you don’t get it, review the progress of abortion, NAMBLA - trans - drag, homeless, illegals, etc.
Always one more level, one more redefinition of words or situation, one more disgust.
Remember…. Retarded Baby ….. Always screaming for worse and more gross.

A guy that is a self made billonaire and obviously doesnt want or need any more money, who lays out an actual path to reforming the FBi, who is the first one with a plan to try to interrupt Black Rock and Vangards quiet creation of a technocracy strikes you as a guy that is a suck up to big tech/pharma? I highly doubt it.

It was by being an entrepreneur that he made his fortune. He touted himself as a scientist, but that's not what his career shows. Creating and selling businesses and stocks is what made him wealthy. i.e. he 'plays the game'.

Also your WEF part is false, he actually sued the WEF for putting him on the list a couple of times.: youtu.be...

He sued the WEF because they listed him without his consent. Ramaswamy has spoken at several WEF events, including the annual meeting in Davos. In 2019, he co-chaired the WEF’s “Healthy Futures” initiative, which focused on improving access to healthcare and promoting innovation in the sector.

In 2021, the businessman participated in a virtual discussion on the role of technology in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic as part of the WEF’s “Davos Agenda” event.

He also led the Covid response for the state of OHIO with mandates, masks, lockdowns and vaccines.

And the Sorros thing he explained like he was a fool not to take that money. And Sorros funds litteraly thousands of people of who he thinks might create chaos at some point i feel.

Well of course! He would be a fool not to accept dirty money and all the expected paybacks such activity entails!

If you only want to consider the attributes and none of the dangers he's your man! I'd think after 8 years of Obama people would be a little more thorough in vetting their candidates.

a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Obama 2.0